On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 11:27 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:16:10AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote: > > There is one very important point though. I think those restrictions can > > easily be implemented in the user session. This means that we can just > > build > > a system with no support for restricted storage, and add it if we find that > > we > > did need it after all. However, Jonathan doesn't seem to agree. At the > > moment I still think he doesn't quite understand what I mean. However, if > > he > > does and is correct that it cannot be added later, we would need to decide > > this before building the system. > > Oh, and I forgot one thing. I'm very sure that I do indeed want the user to > be able to run his own programs on fully opaque storage. This is very useful > for programs handling encryption keys....
I seem to recall that this was one of the very first use cases that I pointed out. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
