At Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:47:20 +0200, "Michal Suchanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This whole argument is pointless as nobody found a design so far that > makes use of TPM impossible, or at least hard. The well organized > components of the Hurd will be likely easier to certify than most > popular OSes. You only need to add a TPM driver, and a service that > does the certification.
I believe that any effective DRM mechanism will be invasive on the whole design of the operating system, for natural reasons. Anyway, I agree that there does not seem to be a technical measure against this technology. At least, I am unaware of such a measure, and in fact I am not even looking for it. I am not interested in the question if there is one and how it would look like. Any effective protection against it would appropriately come from a legal restriction, ie GPL v3 for example (but there are other cases where people have excluded DRM applications by choice of license). Thanks, Marcus _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
