On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 14:29 +0100, Richard Braun wrote: > The problem is simple : we can't begin anything until we know what we > want, until goals and ways to achieve them are designed and apply well. > This is still not the case. It looks like we're not far from this point, > but we haven't reached it yet.
I agree broadly with what Richard is saying here. Certainly, we cannot build hurd-ng until there is some consensus what hurd-ng is about. Marcus and Neal have been trying to build that. They are working on a document provisionally entitled "A critique of the Hurd" as a starting point. I suspect that the low-level components of Coyotos will converge quickly, and that these will be directly useful to the Hurd, so people who are looking for something to do may want to start there. We should be able to start responding sensibly on Coyotos questions late next week. shap _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
