Marcus> This "destined to S" in your proposal appears to be exactly the Marcus> tagging that I proposed. Don't you think so?
Pierre> No tagging takes place in my scenario. Instead, only the graph of Pierre> capabilities dictate who is able to use the opaque storage capability. I think I'm getting what the talk is about - how does A decide if it can trust S? Anton P.S. trust = allow to use A's storage in an opaque fashion _______________________________________________ L4-hurd mailing list L4-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd
