On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:49:00PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote: > Doesn't Fiasco.OC provide sufficient object capability support, or is the > "OC" > labelling not accurate according to certain criteria? (I can envisage people > having differing ideas about capability systems.) > > "Object-oriented capability system - Unified universal mechanism for naming, > authorization and communication control" > > http://l4re.org/fiasco/features.html
Yeah I'm not too familiar with all L4 variants, but this one does seem to provide object capabilities. -- Richard Braun
