Where Is the Hirsch Report?
By Richard Heinberg, www.museletter.com

Over the past few months controversy has raged over the timing of 
Peak Oil-the moment when global oil production will reach its 
all-time maximum and begin its inevitable descent.

Oil optimists say the event won't occur for twenty years or more, and 
that market forces will result in an imperceptible transition to 
alternative forms of energy. "The Stone Age didn't end for lack of 
stones," say the optimists, "and the Petroleum Age won't end because 
we run out of oil"-but because we find something better and cheaper 
with which to fuel our society.

Pessimists point out that global oil discoveries have been plummeting 
for decades and that supply and demand are now closely matched (hence 
the run-up in oil prices over the past few months); moreover, there 
simply isn't an alternative energy source available that can take 
oil's place in the near term. They say we may be at peak now, and 
that the consequences will be staggering.
In short, oil pessimists spin out end-of-civilization scenarios while 
optimists insist that there is nothing to worry about.

Evidently the US Department of Energy is interested enough in the 
Peak-Oil debate to commission a report on the subject. Released in 
February this year by Science Applications International Corporation 
(SAIC), and titled "Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, 
Mitigation and Risk Management," the report examines the likely 
consequences of the impending global peak. It was authored 
principally by Robert L. Hirsch (bio: 
www.d-n-i.net/fcs/hirsch_bio.htm), and is as remarkable for its 
subsequent reception as for its content.

The report's Executive Summary begins with the following paragraph:

The peaking of world oil production presents the U.S. and the world with an
unprecedented risk management problem. As peaking is approached, 
liquid fuel prices and price volatility will increase dramatically, 
and, without timely mitigation, the economic, social, and political 
costs will be unprecedented. Viable mitigation options exist on both 
the supply and demand sides, but to have substantial impact, they 
must be initiated more than a decade in advance of peaking.

The report's authors were not asked to assess when the global peak is 
likely to occur; however they do survey the range of forecasts from 
optimists and pessimists alike, projecting a peak date anywhere from 
2005 to 2037.

The Hirsch report examines three scenarios: one in which mitigation 
efforts are not undertaken until global oil production peaks; a 
second in which efforts commence ten years in advance of peak; and a 
third in which efforts begin twenty years prior to the peak. Each 
scenario assumes a "crash program rate of implementation." In the 
first case, the study concludes that peak will leave the world with a 
"significant liquid fuels deficit for more than two decades" that 
"will almost certainly cause major economic upheaval"; even with a 
ten-year lead time for mitigation efforts government intervention 
will be required and the world will experience a ten-year fuel 
shortfall. A crash program initiated twenty years ahead of the event 
will offer "the possibility" of avoiding a fuel shortfall. The report 
emphasizes repeatedly that both supply- and demand-side mitigation 
options will take many years to implement and will cost "literally 
trillions of dollars"; it also notes that "the world has never faced 
a problem like this."

The Hirsch report concludes that substantial mitigation of the 
economic, social, and political impacts of Peak Oil can come only 
from efforts both to increase energy supplies from alternative 
sources and to reduce demand for oil. With regard to the claim that 
efficiency measures by themselves will be enough to forestall dire 
impacts, Hirsch et al. note that, "While greater end-use efficiency 
is essential, increased efficiency alone will be neither sufficient 
nor timely enough to solve the problem. Production of large amounts 
of substitute liquid fuels will be required." Further, "Mitigation 
will require a minimum of a decade of intense, expensive effort, 
because the scale of liquid fuels mitigation is inherently extremely 
large." Hirsch, et al., also point out that "The problems associated 
with world oil production peaking will not be temporary, and past 
'energy crisis' experience will provide relatively little guidance."

Oil optimists often say that efforts aimed at mitigating the effects 
of Peak Oil undertaken too soon would entail a cost to society. The 
SAIC Report agrees. However, it concludes that, "If peaking is 
imminent, failure to initiate timely mitigation could be extremely 
damaging. Prudent risk management requires the planning and 
implementation of mitigation well before peaking. Early mitigation 
will almost certainly be less expensive than delayed mitigation."

Optimists also insist that the market can take care of the problem: 
high oil prices will stimulate more exploration, the development of 
more efficient cars, and the deployment of alternative energy 
technologies. Interference with market mechanisms would be harmful, 
they say, and so the government should steer clear of the problem by 
avoiding setting higher efficiency standards, subsidizing renewables, 
and so on.

The report's authors dismiss these claims. Price signals warn only of 
immediate scarcity; however, the mitigation efforts needed in order 
to prepare for the global oil production peak must be undertaken many 
years in advance of the event. Hirsch, et al., maintain that, 
"Intervention by governments will be required, because the economic 
and social implications of oil peaking would otherwise be chaotic. 
The experiences of the 1970s and 1980s offer important guides as to 
government actions that are desirable and those that are undesirable, 
but the process will not be easy."

Here, then, is a significant report produced by an independent 
research company for the US Department of Energy, warning of a global 
problem of "unprecedented" proportions with economic, social, and 
political impacts that are likely to be extremely severe. The authors 
forecast "protracted economic hardship" for the United States and the 
rest of the world. It is a problem that deserves "immediate, serious 
attention."

Yet, half a year after its release, the Hirsch report is nowhere to 
be found. For several months it was archived, in PDF format, on a 
high school web site (www.hilltoplancers.org, Hilltop High School in 
Chula Vista, Calif.). On July 7 the report disappeared from that 
site. The Atlantic Council (www.acus.org) is considering publishing 
the Hirsch report; however there is no projected date of release. 
When contacted, Dr. Hirsch replied that the document is "a public 
report, paid for and released by DOE NETL, and that it therefore 
could be reposted at will." Project
Censored is therefore posting the report in full at:
http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/The_Hirsch_Report_Proj_Cens.pdf

If the content of the Hirsch report is to be believed-and there is 
every reason to think it should be-then this is a document that 
deserves the close attention of every leader of government and 
industry in the US. Newspapers and newsmagazines should be running 
excerpts and summaries. Instead, there is nearly total silence. In 
late May Robert Hirsch presented the substance of the report at the 
annual Workshop of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) 
in Lisbon, Portugal to an audience of about 300 
(www.cge.uevora.pt/aspo2005/abscom/Abstract_Lisbon_Hirsch.pdf ). That 
event received virtually no press coverage in the US.

Meanwhile oil is hovering around $60 and is likely to head higher, 
and analysts look to the fourth quarter of 2005 unsure whether supply 
will be able to keep up with burgeoning demand.

Richard Heinberg
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EarthLink Revolves Around You

Hirsch Report on Line at Project Censored:
http://www.projectcensored.org/newsflash/The_Hirsch_Report_Proj_Cens.pdf
-- 
Peter Phillips Ph.D.
Sociology Department/Project Censored
Sonoma State University
1801 East Cotati Ave.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
707-664-2588
http://www.projectcensored.org/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hahvpg4/M=320369.6903865.7846595.3022212/D=groups/S=1705060411:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1122712010/A=2896112/R=0/SIG=1107idj9u/*http://www.thanksandgiving.com
">Give the gift of life to a sick child. Support St. Jude Children¿s Research 
Hospital</a>.</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to