>Subject: The "Special" Election
>From: Jackie Goldberg
>Hi everyone-There are only four weeks to go until the so-called "special" 
>election. And the big worry is that only reactionary people will vote! I 
>can tell you for a fact, that this may be one of the more important 
>California elections in recent years.
>You see, the corporate take-over of California is what is being proposed. 
>Several of the Governor's measures, all sponsored and paid for by members 
>of the corporate elite of California and the United States
>have several goals. First and foremost they do NOT want to be bothered 
>having to work with the pesky
>legislature. So, they propose something they call "Live within your 
>means." This measure makes the Governor a King where matters of money are 
>concerned. It also trashes the Prop. 98 guarantee for Public Education. 
>What that means is that the Governor can unilaterally determine how to cut 
>the budget if the legislature cannot get a 2/3 vote to do so. And that 
>means that the Republicans will NEVER vote for a budget if there is a 
>Republican Governor who will be able to cut anything he wants, however he 
>wants, without the approval of the legislature. It means that the 
>legislature is irrelevant to the budget process.
>Regardless of what you feel about the current Governor, it is not hard to 
>believe that at some time, some Governor will slash health care, human 
>services, and public education because he/she needs no one to
>approve. Checks and balances were set into the California constitution to 
>prevent one-man rule. This election could overturn this.
>Then, of course there is the redrawing of district election lines. No 
>state uses retired judges. In fact almost  all of them do it the way we in 
>California currently do it. That is the legislature, with the signature of 
>the Governor, writes a plan every ten years. Both sides have to agree. 
>When they cannot agree, a lawsuit puts it into court, and then an  active 
>judge will make the changes necessary to make it fair. Think about retired 
>judges. Currently almost all of them are going to be Anglo males, largely 
>drawn from the men appointed by Governors Wilson and Deukmejian. This does 
>not sound "non-partisan" to me.
>All in all, it is just a power grab. Even the so-called Prop. 78 "drug 
>savings" measure is paid for by the biggest pharmaceutical companies and 
>would be entirely voluntary on their part. The real savings to consumers 
>would come from Prop. 79 and the drug companies are spending millions to 
>stop this good measure.
>This ballot has something to hate for everyone. One proposition tries to 
>kill off the voice of public employee unions by making it harder to get an 
>OK from members to use money collected to lobby or support candidates. 
>Another tells a young person who wants to teach that they will have 
>absolutely NO job protection for five years! No other job in the state is 
>treated like that. Talented young people with about $100,000 in debt from 
>five years training at a University will not likely choose teaching 
>because of this uncertainty.
>And of course, no assault on our rights would be complete with an attempt 
>to limit a woman's right to choose. So here is how I am going to vote:
>
>Prop. 73 NO Prop. 75 NO Prop. 77 NO
>Prop. 74 NO Prop. 76 NO Prop. 78 NO
>That is six big NO's on the November 8th ballot.  There are actually two 
>good measures and they are, of
>course, at the very end. They are Prop. 79 YES; and Prop. 80 YES.
>I am voting YES on Prop. 79, because it would require the drug companies 
>to negotiate a real deal with the
>state of California that would cover Medi-Cal recipients, and the savings 
>would also be passed on to all Californians in lowering the drug costs for 
>them as well. And Prop. 80, I am voting YES because it would re-regulate 
>electricity in California so we don't end up with blackouts and with the 
>gaming of our system by Texas Oil and Gas, and Electric company traders 
>like Enron, etc.
>So, be sure to vote on Tuesday Novebmer 8th! Vote absentee, or go to the 
>polls. But VOTE! If we fail to show up, those who want corporate rule will 
>win by default. This is why they wanted a $50 million special election. 
>They knew there was no urgency.  They want this vote because they believe 
>we won't go to the polls and a very small minority of reactionary voters 
>will be able to carry the vote on these draconian measures.
>If you want more detail on these measures, go to the
>website: www.speakoutca.org <http://www.speakoutca.org> . There you will find
>background info, and a printable voting guide to send
>to your family and friends, and co-workers. Remember,
>friends don't let friends neglect their civic duty.
>Especially when so much is at stake.
>If you would like to hear more in person, I am having a community meeting 
>at Logan Elementary School on October 27th, Thursday, from 6:30 to 8:30 
>p.m. And if you want to help defeat these measures, call SEIU Local 347, 
>at (323) 712-1779 to join me in walking precincts. Or you can phone voters 
>by calling (213) 381-5611 ext. 40 and ask for Norma Lopez. I'll see you 
>there too.
>Warmest regards, as always,
>Jackie
>
>
>
>P.S.
>Remember If you can not attend the community meeting www.speakoutca.org 
>has information on all of the initiatives and a downloadable voters guide 
>in english and soon in spanish as well! The "Special" Election is on 
>Tuesday November 8th!
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose.org helps at-risk students succeed. Fund a student project today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/O4u7KD/FpQLAA/E2hLAA/7gSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to