Julia Ward Howe, author of The Battle Hymn of the Republic, began Mother's
Day for Peace as part of her work on behalf of peace and social justice. She
wrote the original Mother's Day Proclamation in 1870 as a way to protest the
carnage of the Civil War.

We believe that today is an appropriate time to reclaim the original intent
and promise of Mother's Day as it represent women's historical role in
movements working for peace and justice.

Stephen J Spiro
Catholic Peace Fellowship
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Mother's Day Proclamation
by Julia Ward Howe

Arise then...women of this day!
Arise, all women who have hearts!
Whether your baptism be of water or of tears!
Say firmly:
"We will not have questions answered by irrelevant agencies,
Our husbands will not come to us, reeking with carnage,
For caresses and applause.

Our sons shall not be taken from us to unlearn
All that we have been able to teach them of charity, mercy and patience.
We, the women of one country,
Will be too tender of those of another country
To allow our sons to be trained to injure theirs."

>From the voice of a devastated Earth a voice goes up with
Our own.  It says: "Disarm! Disarm!
The sword of murder is not the balance of justice."
Blood does not wipe our dishonor,
Nor violence indicate possession.

As men have often forsaken the plough and the anvil
At the summons of war,
Let women now leave all that may be left of home
For a great and earnest day of counsel.

Let them meet first, as women, to bewail and commemorate the dead.
Let them solemnly take counsel with each other as to the means
Whereby the great human family can live in peace...

Each bearing after his own time the sacred impress, not of Caesar,
But of God -

In the name of womanhood and humanity, I earnestly ask
That a general congress of women without limit of nationality,
May be appointed and held at someplace deemed most convenient

And the earliest period consistent with its objects,
To promote the alliance of the different nationalities,
The amicable settlement of international questions,
The great and general interests of peace.

http://icasualties.org/oif/US_CITY.aspx

***

Toronto Sun March 26, 2006

The Final Say

Three years after George Bush declared 'mission accomplished,' parts of Iraq
lie in ruins, threatened by anarchy and approaching civil war

By Eric Margolis

U.S. President George Bush again reassured Americans last week they were
winning the war in Iraq.

Please, Mr. President, no more "mission accomplished," no more victories.
Your debacle in Iraq recalls King Phyrrus' famous lament, "One more such
victory and we are ruined."

The Bush administration invaded Iraq for two key reasons: 1) To seize Iraq's
vast oil reserves and turn Iraq into a base to dominate the Mideast; 2) To
destroy one of Israel's two main enemies (Iran being the other).

Three years later, the first goal remains elusive while the second was
achieved. Large parts of Iraq -- once the Arab world's most developed nation
-- are in ruins, anarchy, or approaching civil war.

Operation Swarmer

U.S. forces in Iraq struggle just to defend their bases and vulnerable
supply lines. Their fruitless, Vietnam-style search-and-destroy missions,
like this week's Operation Swarmer, are a sure sign of strategic failure and
senior officers too stupid or arrogant to draw obvious lessons from recent
guerilla wars.

More than 2,300 American soldiers have died; 16,300 wounded. Some 30,000
Iraqi civilians have died. The U.S. holds 15,000 to 18,000 Iraqi prisoners
-- more than did Saddam Hussein.

The stalemated wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost Washington a staggering
$9.8 billion (all figures US) monthly as the U.S. Treasury borrows billions
from China and Japan just to keep the government running. That figure
excludes hundreds of millions in secret CIA bribes to rent co-operation from
tribal chiefs and politicians, or hire mercenaries called "contractors."

What was to have been a jolly little war to "liberate" Iraq's oil has cost
over $500 billion so far. That's $50 billion more than the Vietnam War's
total cost in 2006 dollars. Clearly, the U.S. armed forces are too expensive
to send to war lasting longer than a few months.

While a debacle for the U.S. and Iraq, the war has greatly benefited Iran
and Israel. Iran's influence in Iraq grows daily. The recent remarkable
public agreement by Washington to open talks over Iraq with Great Satan Iran
shows even the Bush people see the writing on the wall in Babylon. Besides,
occupying Iraq has left the U.S. too weak to invade Iran.

After getting Saddam to invade Iran in 1980, and funding the ensuing
eight-year Iran-Iraq war, the U.S. now watches helplessly as Iran slowly
ingests large portions of Iraq. The U.S. invasion of Iraq handed power to
pro-Iranian Shia religious parties. Shia spiritual leader Ali al Sistani
warned followers they would go straight to hell -- and lose their wives --
if they did not vote for Shia religious candidates. Some democracy.

Israel has been the second beneficiary of the Iraq war. The long-term
strategic goal of Israel's rightists -- shattering unstable Arab states to
leave Israel dominant in the region -- has been half attained by Iraq's
fragmentation into three parts. Syria is destabilized and faces possible
civil war. Any future challenge by Iraq to Israel's Mideast nuclear monopoly
has vanished.

Meanwhile, Israel has been able to cut defence spending, intensify pressure
on the Palestinians, and is quietly extending its influence into the
semi-independent, oil-rich Kurdish region of northern Iraq.

$10B a month

Ironically, the third major beneficiary of Bush's war has been his nemesis,
Osama bin Laden. The only way to drive U.S. influence out of the Muslim
world, bin Laden has long maintained, is to tie it down in a series of small
wars that bleed it financially. The nearly $10-billion-a-month wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq are doing just that. Iraq, as even Bush admits, has
become an incubator, magnet, and call to arms for anti-American jihadists
across the Muslim world.

Worse, the United States has lost its honour in this brutal little
neo-colonial war. The neoconservatives' ambition to plunder Iraq's oil has
become a mirage, and the Bush-Cheney diumverate presidency is quickly
sinking into the quick-sands of Iraq.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

***

Jimmy Carter: Punishing the innocent is a crime

 International Herald Tribune                         SUNDAY, MAY 7, 2006

ATLANTA

Innocent Palestinian people are being treated like animals, with the
presumption that they are guilty of some crime. Because they voted for
candidates who are members of Hamas, the United States government has become
the driving force behind an apparently effective scheme of depriving the
general public of income, access to the outside world and the necessities of
life.

Overwhelmingly, these are school teachers, nurses, social workers, police
officers, farm families, shopkeepers, and their employees and families who
are just hoping for a better life. Public opinion polls conducted after the
January parliamentary election show that 80 percent of Palestinians still
want a peace agreement with Israel based on the international road map
premises. Although Fatah party members refused to join Hamas in a coalition
government, nearly 70 percent of Palestinians continue to support Fatah's
leader, Mahmoud Abbas, as their president.

It is almost a miracle that the Palestinians have been able to orchestrate
three elections during the past 10 years, all of which have been honest,
fair, strongly contested, without violence and with the results accepted by
winners and losers. Among the 62 elections that have been monitored by us at
the Carter Center, these are among the best in portraying the will of the
people.

One clear reason for the surprising Hamas victory for legislative seats was
that the voters were in despair about prospects for peace. With American
acquiescence, the Israelis had avoided any substantive peace talks for more
than five years, regardless of who had been chosen to represent the
Palestinian side as interlocutor.

The day after his party lost the election, Abbas told me that his own
struggling government could not sustain itself financially with their daily
lives and economy so severely disrupted, and access from Palestine to Israel
and the outside world almost totally restricted. They were already $900
million in debt and had no way to meet the payroll for the following month.
The additional restraints imposed on the new government are a planned and
deliberate catastrophe for the citizens of the occupied territories, in
hopes that Hamas will yield to the economic pressure.

With all their faults, Hamas leaders have continued to honor a temporary
cease-fire, or hudna, during the past 18 months, and their spokesman told me
that this "can be extended for two, 10 or even 50 years if the Israelis will
reciprocate." Although Hamas leaders have refused to recognize the state of
Israel while their territory is being occupied, Prime Minister Ismail
Haniyeh has expressed approval for peace talks between Abbas and Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel. He added that if these negotiations result
in an agreement that can be accepted by Palestinians, then the Hamas
position regarding Israel would be changed.

Regardless of these intricate and long-term political interrelationships, it
is unconscionable for Israel, the United States and others under their
influence to continue punishing the innocent and already persecuted people
of Palestine. The Israelis are withholding approximately $55 million a month
in taxes and customs duties that, without dispute, belong to the
Palestinians. Although some Arab nations have allocated funds for
humanitarian purposes to alleviate human suffering, the U.S. government is
threatening the financial existence of any Jordanian or other bank that
dares to transfer this assistance into Palestine.

There is no way to predict what will happen in Palestine, but it would be a
tragedy for the international community to abandon the hope that a peaceful
coexistence of two states in the Holy Land is possible. Like Egypt and all
other Arab nations before the Camp David Accords of 1978, and the Palestine
Liberation Organization before the Oslo peace agreement of 1993, Hamas has
so far refused to recognize the sovereign state of Israel as legitimate,
with a right to live in peace. This is a matter of great concern to all of
us, and the international community needs to probe for an acceptable way out
of this quagmire. There is no doubt that Israelis and Palestinians both want
a durable two-state solution, but depriving the people of Palestine of their
basic human rights just to punish their elected leaders is not a path to
peace.

(Former President Jimmy Carter  is founder of the Carter Center, a nonprofit
organization working for peace and health worldwide. )

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/07/opinion/edcarter.php









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Everything you need is one click away.  Make Yahoo! your home page now.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/AHchtC/4FxNAA/yQLSAA/7gSolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to