http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20060919_robert_scheer_rendering_unto_syria/

Rendering Unto Syria
Posted on Sep 19, 2006

By Robert Scheer

What an outrage for the president to invoke the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights in his address to the United Nations, a day after a Canadian
government commission accused the U.S. of rendering a Canadian to Syria for
torture. Did no one on his staff inform the president that Article 5 of that
declaration explicitly states, "No one shall be subjected to torture or to
cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment"?

For those, like Bush, who regard torture as a variant of college fraternity
hazing, it would be instructive to consider the fate of Maher Arar as
revealed in that devastating Canadian judicial report released on Monday.
Arar, a Canadian citizen and engineer who had fled repressive Syria two
decades earlier as a teenager, was seized by the FBI at JFK Airport and
"rendered" to the government of Syria for nearly a year of being whipped
with a "shredded electrical cable until he was disoriented"-that is, when he
was not confined to his coffin-size cage.

The United States transported Arar to the very same Syria which Bush has
been condemning since his first days in office, and as he did again on
Tuesday, calling Syria "a crossroad for terrorism." So, will anyone in that
somnambulant White House press corps dare ask the president why he would
turn over a prisoner to such a government? And an innocent one at that?

Yes, innocent. On Monday, the Canadian justice who headed a 30-month
investigation of this case concluded: "I am able to say categorically that
there is no evidence that Mr. Arar has committed any offense." The judge
employed characteristic Canadian restraint in concluding in his damning
three-volume, 822-page report that "The American authorities who handled Mr.
Arar's case treated Mr. Arar in a most regrettable fashion. They removed him
to Syria against his wishes and in the face of his statements that he would
be tortured if sent there.  Moreover they dealt with Canadian officials
involved with Mr. Arar's case in a less than forthcoming manner."

To put it a bit more bluntly: U.S. officials lied to their Canadian
counterparts and never revealed that Arar was "rendered" to Syria precisely
to be tortured.

In fact, the outsourcing of torture, as Congressman Ed Markey (D-Mass.)
exposes so brilliantly on his website, has been the official and
all-too-common practice of this president since 9/11. Foreign nationals have
been stolen off the streets of even close democratic allies of the United
States and sent to be tortured by regimes otherwise branded as fascist by
this president.

Yet even the highly skilled and practiced torturers in Syria concluded that
the Canadian engineer was totally innocent. Since no one in this
administration has seen fit to apologize to Mr. Arar, or his government, are
we to conclude that they feel the Syrian torturers failed to find evidence
of guilt because they were too restrained in their techniques?  We are not
likely to find out if Congress and the media continue to ignore the
frightening descent of this presidency into barbarism.

The epic copout behind all this, of course, is that national security after
9/11 requires the shredding of America's reputation for treating liberty as
sacred. The argument is that while errors may occur when you cast a wide
net-the U.S. currently is holding, according to an Associated Press report
last week, more than 14,000 uncharged foreign nationals in unregulated
military prisons around the world-these horrendous tactics are needed to nab
the truly bad actors.

That, in effect, is the argument advanced by the president in his press
conference last week defending the efficacy, indeed the necessity, of
inhuman practices as proscribed in Article Three of the Geneva Convention.
Burbling with his standard unwarranted optimism, Bush cited what he claimed
to be the excellent results of the interrogation of alleged 9/11 mastermind
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who has been held prisoner in secret locations for
the past three years.

But according to the reports of the 9/11 Commission and the Senate
Intelligence Committee, what has been learned from the interrogation of
Khalid and other "key witnesses" is that there was nothing but enmity
between bin Laden's gang and the regime of Saddam Hussein.  Despite up to
five years of torture, it seems that those key witnesses still did not tell
the Bush administration what it wanted to hear.  Perhaps they should have
been rendered to some other nation with a richer tradition in such
investigative techniques.

***

Reuters - Sep 18, 2006

Israel Denies POW Status to Captured Fighters;
Files criminal charges against Hizbollah men

By Dan Williams

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel prosecutors indicted three Lebanese
Hizbollah guerrillas on Monday on a raft of charges including helping
carry out the deadly operation to snatch two soldiers that sparked a
war with the Jewish state.

The three men, all in their early 20s, are also charged with murder,
attempted murder and belonging to a terrorist group.

The trial opening in Nazareth District Court reflects Israel's refusal
to recognize Hizbollah as a legitimate fighting force, despite the
Shi'ite group's broadbased support in Lebanon and representation in the
Beirut government and parliament.

"The defendants are not prisoners of war," said Justice Ministry
spokesman Bishara Farran. "Hizbollah acts deliberately against civilian
targets, and from within civilian populations, something that is
absolutely forbidden by the laws of war."

Officials said the three -- Mahmoud Ali Suleiman, Mohammed Srur and
Maher Qurani -- were captured in southern Lebanon by Israeli forces
during the war, launched after Hizbollah seized the two soldiers and
killed eight others in a July 12 ambush.

All three were accused of having support roles in that raid.

Srur and Qurani were charged with attempted murder. Suleiman was
charged with murder for being assigned to provide covering fire, though
the indictment said he did not actually shoot.

Prosecutors said the guerrillas received weapons training in Iran,
Israel's arch-foe and a Hizbollah patron, and that two of them were
taken prisoner while preparing to attack the Israeli forces that swept
through south Lebanon during the 34-day war.

One of the two state-appointed lawyers representing the Hizbollah
captives said they would probably contest the charges at a follow-up
reading of the indictment slated for Oct 5.

"Our clients do not deny being Hizbollah fighters," attorney Smadar
Ben-Natan told Reuters. "Our position is that they have the status of
prisoners of war, and as such should not be tried. They should be held
until a prisoner exchange is worked out."

PUBLIC RECKONING

Trying the three in open criminal court rather than in a military
tribunal may signal a desire by Israeli authorities for a public
reckoning that could offset unhappiness in the Jewish state with the
war's inconclusive end in an August 14 truce.

While killing some 1,200 people in Lebanon, most of them civilians,
Israel's armed forces failed to crush Hizbollah or stop its
cross-border rocket salvoes against northern Israeli communities.
Israel lost 157 citizens, most of them soldiers.

In past wars with Arab states, Israel held captured enemy troops until
they could be swapped for its own prisoners.

But like the United States, Israel considers Hizbollah -- which
advocates the Jewish state's destruction -- a terrorist group. The
European Union does not.

Moshe Negby, legal analyst for Israel Radio, said the Justice Ministry
had been compelled to prosecute the captives by precedents set after
the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

"If they hadn't been charged, it would have been difficult for Israel
to detain them," he said. "The Supreme Court has ruled that detainees
cannot be held as bargaining chips or as hostages for a prisoner
exchange. It contradicts the laws governing human rights."

Israeli political sources have predicted the release of Lebanese
prisoners in exchange for the two soldiers held by Hizbollah. Even if
convicted and sentenced to lengthy prison terms, the three Hizbollah
captives could expect to be included.

(Additional reporting by Ari Rabinovitch in Jerusalem)

© Reuters 2006. All rights reserved.








---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to