In Case I Disappear
     By William Rivers Pitt
     t r u t h o u t | Perspective

     Friday 29 September 2006

     I have been told a thousand times at least, in the years I have 
spent reporting on the astonishing and repugnant abuses, lies and 
failures of the Bush administration, to watch my back. "Be careful," 
people always tell me. "These people are capable of anything. Stay 
off small planes, make sure you aren't being followed." A running 
joke between my mother and me is that she has a "safe room" set up 
for me in her cabin in the woods, in the event I have to flee because 
of something I wrote or said.

     I always laughed and shook my head whenever I heard this stuff. 
Extreme paranoia wrapped in the tinfoil of conspiracy, I thought. 
This is still America, and these Bush fools will soon pass into 
history, I thought. I am a citizen, and the First Amendment hasn't 
yet been red-lined, I thought.

     Matters are different now.

     It seems, perhaps, that the people who warned me were not so 
paranoid. It seems, perhaps, that I was not paranoid enough. 
Legislation passed by the Republican House and Senate, legislation 
now marching up to the Republican White House for signature, has 
shattered a number of bedrock legal protections for suspects, 
prisoners, and pretty much anyone else George W. Bush deems to be an enemy.

     So much of this legislation is wretched on the surface. Habeas 
corpus has been suspended for detainees suspected of terrorism or of 
aiding terrorism, so the Magna Carta-era rule that a person can face 
his accusers is now gone. Once a suspect has been thrown into prison, 
he does not have the right to a trial by his peers. Suspects cannot 
even stand in representation of themselves, another ancient 
protection, but must accept a military lawyer as their defender.

     Illegally-obtained evidence can be used against suspects, 
whether that illegal evidence was gathered abroad or right here at 
home. To my way of thinking, this pretty much eradicates our security 
in persons, houses, papers, and effects, as stated in the Fourth 
Amendment, against illegal searches and seizures.

     Speaking of collecting evidence, the torture of suspects and 
detainees has been broadly protected by this new legislation. While 
it tries to delineate what is and is not acceptable treatment of 
detainees, in the end, it gives George W. Bush the final word on what 
constitutes torture. US officials who use cruel, inhumane or 
degrading treatment to extract information from detainees are now 
shielded from prosecution.

     It was two Supreme Court decisions, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Hamdan 
v. Rumsfeld, that compelled the creation of this legislation. The 
Hamdi decision held that a prisoner has the right of habeas corpus, 
and can challenge his detention before an impartial judge. The Hamdan 
decision held that the military commissions set up to try detainees 
violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions.

     In short, the Supreme Court wiped out virtually every legal 
argument the Bush administration put forth to defend its 
extraordinary and dangerous behavior. The passage of this legislation 
came after a scramble by Republicans to paper over the torture and 
murder of a number of detainees. As columnist Molly Ivins wrote on 
Wednesday, "Of the over 700 prisoners sent to Gitmo, only 10 have 
ever been formally charged with anything. Among other things, this 
bill is a CYA for torture of the innocent that has already taken place."

     It seems almost certain that, at some point, the Supreme Court 
will hear a case to challenge the legality of this legislation, but 
even this is questionable. If a detainee is not allowed access to a 
fair trial or to the evidence against him, how can he bring a legal 
challenge to a court? The legislation, in anticipation of court 
challenges like Hamdi and Hamdan, even includes severe restrictions 
on judicial review over the legislation itself.

     The Republicans in Congress have managed, at the behest of Mr. 
Bush, to draft a bill that all but erases the judicial branch of the 
government. Time will tell whether this aspect, along with all the 
others, will withstand legal challenges. If such a challenge comes, 
it will take time, and meanwhile there is this bill. All of the above 
is deplorable on its face, indefensible in a nation that prides 
itself on Constitutional rights, protections and the rule of law.

     Underneath all this, however, is where the paranoia sets in.

     Underneath all this is the definition of "enemy combatant" that 
has been established by this legislation. An "enemy combatant" is now 
no longer just someone captured "during an armed conflict" against 
our forces. Thanks to this legislation, George W. Bush is now able to 
designate as an "enemy combatant" anyone who has "purposefully and 
materially supported hostilities against the United States."

     Consider that language a moment. "Purposefully and materially 
supported hostilities against the United States" is in the eye of the 
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be 
astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers 
given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely 
detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out 
against Iraq or any other part of the so-called "War on Terror."

     If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be 
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against 
the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration 
against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation 
could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that 
senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize 
him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed 
under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the 
power to lock them up.

     By writing this essay, I could be deemed an "enemy combatant." 
It's that simple, and very soon, it will be the law. I always laughed 
when people told me to be careful. I'm not laughing anymore.

     In case I disappear, remember this. America is an idea, a dream, 
and that is all. We have borders and armies and citizens and commerce 
and industry, but all this merely makes us like every other nation on 
this Earth. What separates us is the idea, the simple idea, that 
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are our organizing 
principles. We can think as we please, speak as we please, write as 
we please, worship as we please, go where we please. We are protected 
from the kinds of tyranny that inspired our creation as a nation in 
the first place.

     That was the idea. That was the dream. It may all be over now, 
but once upon a time, it existed. No good idea ever truly dies. The 
dream was here, and so was I, and so were you.





John Johnson
Change-Links Progressive Newspaper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://change-links.org
Subscribe to our list server. Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(818) 782-1412
Cell (818) 681-7448.

===





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to