Hi.  The Silent Scream of both articles is 'Out Now!'  Why the fools
in DC, all of them, don't make the connections is our major problem.
An etherial thank you to Rachel Carson.  -Ed

http://select.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/opinion/01krugman.html?th&emc=th

Economic Storm Signals

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: December 1, 2006

"It's tough to make predictions," Yogi Berra is supposed to have said,
"especially about the future." Actually, his remark makes perfect sense to
economists, who sometimes have trouble making predictions about the present.
And this is one of those times.

We're now two-thirds of the way through the fourth quarter of 2006, so you
might think we'd already know how the quarter is going. Yet, economists'
assessments of the current state of the U.S. economy, never mind the future,
are all over the place.

And here's the bad news: this kind of confusion about what's going on is
what typically happens when the economy is at a turning point, when an
economic expansion is about to turn into a recession (or vice versa). At
turning points, the various indicators that usually tell us which way the
economic wind is blowing often point in different directions, so that both
optimists and pessimists can find data to support their position.

The last time things were this confused was early in 2001, when most
economists failed to realize that the United States was sliding into
recession. If that sounds ominous, it should: the bond market, which has a
pretty good record of forecasting recessions, is pointing toward a serious
economic slowdown next year.

Before I explain what the bond market is telling us, let's talk about why
the economy may be at a turning point.

Between mid-2003 and mid-2006, economic growth in the United States was
fueled mainly by a huge housing boom, which created jobs directly and made
it easy for consumers to spend freely by borrowing against their rising home
equity.

That housing boom has now gone bust. But the optimists and pessimists
disagree both about how bad the bust will get and about how much damage the
housing slump will do to the economy as a whole.

The optimists include Alan Greenspan, whom some accuse of letting the
housing bubble get out of hand in the first place. On Tuesday, he told
investors at a conference that the worst of the housing slump is over,
saying that "it looks as though sales figures have stabilized."

But the very next day the government released grim data on new home sales
for October, and revised its estimates for earlier months downward. Most,
though not all, of the other economic numbers that came out this week were
also substantially weaker than expected.

Pessimists feel vindicated by the downbeat data. Nouriel Roubini of Roubini
Global Economics, who has been forecasting a housing-led recession for some
time, now believes that the economy has already stalled: he predicts zero
growth for the current quarter. Economists at Deutsche Bank say the same
thing.

But that's still a minority position; most forecasters are still telling us
not to worry. So whom should you listen to? And how can you avoid believing
what you want to believe?

Maybe the best answer is to look at what the financial markets say. Not the
stock market, which is a notoriously bad indicator of the economy's
direction, but the bond market. (Paul Samuelson, the Nobel Prize-winning
M.I.T. economist, famously quipped that the stock market had predicted nine
of the last five recessions).

Since last summer, when the housing bust became unmistakable, interest rates
on long-term bonds have fallen sharply. They're now yielding much less than
short-term bonds. The fact that investors are willing to buy those long-term
bonds anyway tells us that these investors expect interest rates to fall.
And that will happen only if the economy weakens, forcing the Federal
Reserve to cut rates. So bond buyers are, in effect, betting on a future
economic slowdown.

How serious a slump is the bond market predicting? Pretty serious. Right
now, statistical models based on the historical correlation between interest
rates and recessions give roughly even odds that we're about to experience a
formal recession. And since even a slowdown that doesn't formally qualify as
a recession can lead to a sharp rise in unemployment, the odds are very
good - maybe 2 to 1 - that 2007 will be a very tough year.

Luckily, we've got good leadership for the coming economic storm: the White
House is occupied by a man who's ideologically flexible, listens to a wide
variety of views, and understands that policy has to be based on careful
analysis, not gut instincts. Oh, wait.

***

Commentaries are sent to Donors of Z/ZNet
To learn more, consult ZNet at http://www.zmag.org

Today's commentary:
http://www.zmag.org/sustainers/content/2006-11/29clement.cfm

==================================

ZNet Commentary
THE INSURANCE COMPANIES' PLAN FOR COVERING THE UNINSURED November 30, 2006
By  Marilyn Clement

In a plan revealed November 13th, less than a week after the historic
election of a new Congress, America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) called
for more hundreds of billions of dollars to be provided by the federal
government to pay for the uninsured - and to pay for them in ways that would
continue to line their own pockets. They call it 'Hope for Millions.'

Here are some of the questions that were not addressed. Why would the
insurance companies who are raking in hundreds of billions of dollars in
excess profits and basically standing in the way of a national non-profit
healthcare program for all create a new plan to cover the uninsured? Why
haven't they done it before? What do they stand to gain? What do they stand
to lose?

The follow-up story should explore the fact that a national healthcare
program is the number one domestic priority of the voters. According to some
statistics, 83% of the people want such a program and recognize that we are
the only industrialized country in the world that doesn't have such a
program. People expect Congress to take decisive action to provide a
national healthcare system.

Most of the people want such a program because the healthcare crisis isn't
primarily about the uninsured. We are all close to being uninsured, and even
when we are insured we face the growing costs of insurance policies, the
co-pays and deductibles, the potential of losing our job, and worst of all,
the fact that insurance companies cancel insurance policies when people get
really sick.

It doesn't have to be that way.

Reporters ought to talk with Congressman John Conyers whose bill, the United
States National Health Insurance Act, H.R. 676, was introduced during the
last Congress and has 78 co- sponsors on it. There is a growing constituency
of millions of people who understand and support this bill. It would provide
comprehensive, quality healthcare for all residents of the United States
including payment for all physicians and hospital costs, dental, optical,
mental health, prescription drugs for all and long-term care, among other
benefits. You would never receive another healthcare bill. There would be no
co-pays, deductibles, or denials. There would never be any more bankruptcies
caused by healthcare costs.

Congressman Conyers has jurisdiction over bankruptcy as apart of his
Judiciary Committee duties. About 50% of the bankruptcies in the U.S. are
caused by healthcare crises. People are losing their homes and their jobs
and their livelihood, children are missing a college education, and
businesses are going bankrupt and/or cutting out healthcare coverage
entirely because of the rising cost of insurance.

It would be good for reporters to check out Conyers' bill and see how it
would be financed by all of us, employers and employees, paying a small
premium based on our income, and that all of us except 5%, the ultra rich,
would be spending less money than we are now paying for healthcare.

The cost of high-priced insurance companies would be eliminated because we
wouldn't need them. They don't provide any healthcare at all. This would
save almost $300 billion each year. Insurance companies just take the money,
make a huge profit, and pay out a reduced amount, too little for the
healthcare of the people. They are money-managers, not healthcare
professionals. They even invest our money in tobacco and other detrimental
corporations. They control the doctors, the Congress, and our healthcare at
the moment. They want to keep that control. So they are scurrying about to
try to get their own survival plan firmly entrenched in Congress.

President Bush's Health Savings Accounts and ownership plans are also
promoted in the AHIP plan. These would provide money to managers and put
more money into Wall Street. The affluent who would then get tax breaks for
saving money for future healthcare needs. Because of their tax-breaks,
government money sorely needed for a healthy society would be used to
further enrich the money managers. People would be urged to pay as much as
possible out of pocket into the system before accessing their Health Savings
Accounts.

Healthcare-NOW is a national movement made up of hundreds of organizations
challenging this kind of continuing government subsidy for the health
insurance industry. We need healthcare not insurance companies. AHIP
represents those 1300 insurance companies that would be replaced by a single
payer such as an improved Medicare for All. At present, they benefit from
the increasing privatization of Medicare Part D and Medicaid and Medicare
reimbursements for their management costs. That's why they are proposing to
'help the uninsured' by providing more tax money to Medicare and Medicaid.

The uninsured must be covered. It is a mandate. But the rest of us need a
good healthcare system too. It could be so simple and so beneficial if we
went for a single payer national non- profit healthcare system instead of
more money to the insurance companies.


Marilyn Clement is National Coordinator of Healthcare-NOW,
www.healthcare-now.org

***

HOLIDAY PARTY/SILENT AUCTION WITH KAMAU DAAOOD AND
ALISON DE LA CRUZ

SATURDAY, DEC. 2, 2006, AT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LIBRARY

An end-of-the-year event at the Southern California Library will feature
performances by powerful spoken word artists Kamau Daaood and
Alison De La Cruz, as well as music and tours.

A gift table and silent auction will offer unique and hard-to-find items,
including rare audio materials, prints, and photos reproduced from the
Library's unique archives on L.A. history; poetry zines produced by
South L.A. youth; and political and cultural books.

It's all at the Southern California Library, 6120 S. Vermont Avenue,
Los Angeles (between Slauson and Gage) on Saturday, December 2,
2006, 2 to 5 p.m. It is free and open to the public; families and children
welcome. Refreshments will be offered. For more information and
performance times, go to www.socallib.org or call (323) 759-6063.

A pioneer of the spoken word movement, Kamau Daaod is a "word musician"
and arts activist who began his early development as a member of the Watts
Writers Workshop and later co-founded the World Stage Performance Gallery in
Leimert Park with jazz drummer Billy Higgins. An inspired seer and seeker,
Daaood speaks to and from the urgency of his times as captured in his
critically acclaimed CD Leimert Park, and his long-awaited collection of
poetry The Language of Saxophones: Selected Poems of Kamau Daaood.

Alison De La Cruz is a poet, playwright, performance artist, event producer,
and 'ate' (older sister) who explores a breadth of issues at the
intersections
of Filipino American, bi-queer, woman-of-color identities with humor and
poignant honesty. She has performed her solo theatrical work, including
Naturally Graceful and Sungka, in venues throughout the country. She is
also the writer, narrator, and associate producer of Grassroots Rising, a
documentary on low-wage Asian immigrant families in L.A.

DJ Wendell Pascual (the "Ascetic Fish"), a student of "vinyl accupuncture
and ayurvedic crate digging" who has produced shows for KPFK 90.7fm's
Aziatik Rhythmz, will provide music for the soul.

The event is sponsored by the Southern California Library, a people's
library located in South Los Angeles, founded over 40 years ago. The Library
has one of the largest archives of Los Angeles community history in the
world and provides access to rare stories of L.A. history through its
collections and community programming.

 "I believe that the right words offered in the right way can be music
holding us together... that art in community is noble work that fosters
beauty and meaning into our lives." These words from poet Kamau Daaood
reflect the themes of this event: faith, hope, leadership, and change in
action. In the urgency of these times, the event offers an opportunity to
come together to celebrate the beauty of our communities that nourishes our
hope and faith, sustaining our struggles to change the world for the better.





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to