Sen. Schumer: We do have evidence Gonzales lied under oath
By: SilentPatriot on Sunday, March 18th, 2007 at 6:34 PM - PDT
During his January 18, 2006 testimony before the Senate Judiciary
Committee, Alberto Gonzales said this:
GONZALES: I would never, ever make a change in a United States attorney
position for political reasons or if it would, in any way, jeopardize an
ongoing serious investigation. I just would not do it.
Download (4689) | Play (3901) Download (1774) | Play (2261)
When asked on Meet the Press this morning if he "had any evidence that a U.S.
attorney was removed and that removal jeopardized an ongoing investigation,"
Senator Schumer said he does and that the evidence is "becoming more and more
overwhelming."
This is why the prosecutor purge is a genuine scandal. Not only is there
clear evidence that the firings were unprecedented and purely
politically-motivated, but Alberto Gonzales lied about it under oath and the
White House keeps changing it's story. What conclusion can we draw from these
lies and revisionisms other than they have something to hide? Namely, that
these eight prosecutors were selectively fired because they did not
sufficiently politicize their offices and succumb to pressure to do so, only
later to be fired for "performance-related" reasons despite receiving exemplary
evaluations.
Transcript below the fold
MSNBC:
SEN. SCHUMER: [B]ut, in these instances, the evidence is becoming more and
more overwhelming that certain U.S. attorneys, and only certain ones, not all
of them, but certain U.S. attorneys were fired because either they wouldn't
prosecute a case that was politically advantageous to the White House or they
were prosecuting a case that was disadvantageous to the White House. Every
legal commentator, left, right, center, says you can't do that, that's the one
thing you can't do.
MR. RUSSERT: Well, let's be specific about this because I want to show you
what the attorney general said in January testifying before your committee.
Let's watch Alberto Gonzales.
(Videotape, January 18, 2007)
MR. ALBERTO GONZALES: I would never, ever make a change in a United States
attorney position for political reasons or if it would, in any way, jeopardize
an ongoing serious investigation. I just would not do it.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: Do you have any evidence that a U.S. attorney was removed and
that removal jeopardized an ongoing investigation?
SEN. SCHUMER: We do have evidence. In fact, four of the U.S. attorneys who
were fired believe that played a role in their removal. Remember, these folks
were called up all of a sudden on December 7th. They thought they were doing,
doing a good job. They said, "You're not doingyou're fired." "Why?" "We can't
tell you." Then they saythere's a little pressure. They say they weren't doing
their job right. We get hold of the evaluations done by their peers, the
judges, everyone in their district, they all get outstanding ratings. And then
it comes out that in four of these instances, they were asked to pursue cases,
individual cases, not a general policy, they were asked to pursue individual
cases that they thought they shouldn't or they were perhaps pressured to stop.
So, yes, there is evidence there in thein the U.S. attorney's mind.
But, Tim, we don't have proof yet, conclusive, beyond a reasonable doubt
proof. That's why we have to go forward with the investigation.
MR. RUSSERT: But this is a very serious charge, Senator. Let me show you a
map of the United States and where these U.S. attorneys come from. There you'll
see up in Michigan and then we have them in New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona,
Arkansas, Washington state and two in California. Where specifically did a U.S.
attorney stop investigating or was a criminal justice case interrupted because
of one of their removals?
SEN. SCHUMER: The most notorious is the Southern District of California, San
Diego. Ms. Lam, the U.S. attorney, had already brought about the conviction of
Duke Cunningham. It came out in the newspapers that she was continuing to
pursue that investigation and it might lead to others, legislative and others.
And in the middle of this investigation, she was fired. So I asked the deputy
attorney general, "Why was she fired?" He said, "Well, she wasn't doing enough
immigration re-entry cases." I said, "Really?" Shehe said, did you tellI
asked him, "Did you tell her?" She said yes. I said, "Well, did she improve?"
This was back in the summer. "Did she improve?" He said, "I have no idea."
Well, gee whiz, if you're firing someone in the middle of the most heated
political investigation in America, don't you think you ought to have a reason
and know the reason?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/03/18/sen-schumer-we-do-have-evidence-gonzales-lied-under-oath/
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
