Real News April 2007



  Senator Feinstein’s Iraq Conflict



In the November 2006 election voters demanded congressional ethics  
reform. Consequently the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules  
Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of  
regulating the ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many  
years, Feinstein has been beset by her own monumental ethical  
conflict of interest. As a member of the Military Construction  
Appropriations subcommittee, Sen. Feinstein voted for appropriations  
worth billions to her husband's firms. As chair of Senate Rules,  
Feinstein will set her own limits on reform and opposes the creation  
of an independent congressional ethics watchdog. Peter Byrne exposes  
a frightening magnitude of corruption in Feinstein’s profitable  
position of public trust as she promotes and exploits the never- 
ending “global war on terror.”



“Senator Feinstein’s Iraq Conflict” Peter Byrne, Bohemian,  
1/24/2007

http://www.bohemian.com/metro/01.24.07/dianne-feinstein-0704.html



UN Accused of Second Massacre in Haiti



Eyewitness testimony confirms killings executed by UN forces in  
Haiti’s Cite Soleil community on December 22. 2006, reportedly as  
collective punishment against the community for a massive  
demonstration of Lavalas supporters that began in Cite Soleil days  
earlier. About ten thousand people demonstrated for the return of  
president Aristide in clear condemnation the foreign military  
occupation of their country. According to residents, UN forces  
attacked their neighborhood days later in the early morning and  
killed more than 30 people including women and children. Footage  
taken by Haiti Information Project videographers shows unarmed  
civilians dying as they tell of indiscriminate gunfire from UN forces.



“UN in Haiti: Accused of Second Massacre” HaitiAction.net, 1/21/2007

http://www.haitiaction.net/News/HIP/1_21_7/1_21_7.html



  KIA: The US Neoliberal Invasion of India


Farmers’ cooperatives in India are defending the nation’s food  
security and the future of Indian farmers against the neoliberal  
invasion of genetically modified (GM) seed. As many as 28,000 Indian  
farmers have committed suicide over the last decade as a result of  
debt incurred from failed GM crops and competition with subsidized US  
crops, Yet when India’s Prime Minister met with President Bush last  
year to finalize nuclear agreements, they also signed the Indo-U.S.  
Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture (KIA), backed by Monsanto, Archer  
Daniels Midland (ADM), and Wal-Mart. The KIA allows for the grab of  
India’s seed sector by Monsanto, of its trade sector by giant  
agribusiness ADM and Cargill, and its retail sector by Wal-Mart. (Wal- 
Mart recently announced plans to open 500 stores in India, starting  
in August 2007.) This is not about “free trade,” Vandana Shiva  
responds, “Today’s trade system, especially in agriculture, is  
dishonest, and dishonesty has become a war against farmers. It’s  
become a genocide.” Farmers are organizing to protect themselves  
against this economic invasion by maintaining traditional seed-banks  
and setting up exemplary systems of communal agrarian support. One  
farmer says, “We do not buy seeds from the market because we suspect  
they may be contaminated with genetically engineered or terminator  
seeds.”

“Vandana Shiva on Farmer Suicides, the U.S.-India Nuclear Deal, Wal- 
Mart in India” Vandana Shiva, Democracy Now! 12/13/2006 http:// 
www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/13/1451229
“Genetically Modified Seeds: Women in India take on Monsanto” Arun  
Shrivastava, Global Research, October 9, 2006

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? 
context=viewArticle&code=ARU20061009&articleId=3427



  US Seeks WTO Impunity for Illegal Agricultural Subsidies



Canada has launched a dispute at the World Trade Organization over  
the use of “trade-distorting” agricultural subsidies by the US.  
The dispute singles out payments to American corn farmers but also  
challenges the total level of US agricultural subsidies. The case  
filed in Geneva on January 8th is the most significant legal  
challenge to the structure of US agricultural subsidies since a  
landmark WTO ruling in 2005 condemned ”trade-distorting” aid to  
American cotton farmers. Oxfam International analysis shows that at  
least 38 developing countries are suffering severely as a result of  
trade distorting subsidies by the EU and US. Meanwhile, the US is  
maneuvering to insert a special “peace clause” into trade  
negotiations that would make its illegal use of farm subsidies immune  
from prosecution, preventing WTO member countries from challenging  
destructive farm subsidies through the WTO dispute settlement process.



“US seeks “get-out clause” for illegal farm payments” Oxfam,  
6/29/06

http://www.oxfam.org/en/news/pressreleases2006/pr060629_wto_geneva


  Behind Blackwater Inc.

As Defense Secretary under George H.W. Bush, Dick Cheney commissioned  
Halliburton to study means of privatizing the US military  
bureaucracy. As Vice President he has ushered in the resulting  
groundwork for the post-9/11 corporate war profiteer bonanza. The  
company that most embodies this privatization of the military  
industrial complex (a primary part of the Project for a New American  
Century and the neoconservative revolution) is, not Halliburton, but  
the private security firm Blackwater. Blackwater is the most powerful  
mercenary firm in the world, with 20,000 soldiers, the world’s  
largest private military base, and a fleet of twenty aircraft,  
including helicopter gunships. It is headed by a very rightwing  
Christian-supremacy activist, ex-Navy Seal named Erik Prince, whose  
family has had deep neo-conservative connections since the 1990s.  
Bush’s latest call for voluntary military corps to accommodate the  
“surge” will add to over half a billion dollars in federal  
contracts to Blackwater, allowing Prince to create a private army to  
defend Christendom around the world against Muslims and others.

“Our Mercenaries in Iraq: Blackwater Inc and Bush's Undeclared  
Surge” Jeremy Scahill,

Democracy Now! 1/26/07

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/26/1559232




Media Exagerates Threats from Iran

The quote attributed to Iran’s President Ahmadinejad, “Israel must  
be wiped off the map” has been met by worldwide condemnation and  
alarm. Ahmadinejad’s actual statements, however, were significantly  
less threatening. In October 2005 Ahmadinejad expressed the belief  
that the West oppresses Muslims through an imposed Zionist regime. He  
quoted the late Ayatollah Khomeini, “The Imam said this regime  
occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time. This statement  
is very wise.” Clearly Ahmadinejad’s actual words call for regime  
change, not war.  A similar statement by Ahmadinejad in December  
2006, “As the Soviet Union disappeared, the Zionist regime will also  
vanish and humanity will be liberated,” was once more altered by AP  
and Reuter to sound more threatening and sent around the world.   
Author Arash Norouzi calls this “media manipulation and propaganda  
in action.” In May of 2006 President Ahmadinejad published an open  
letter to President Bush clearly asking for peace and the mutual  
respect of human rights. He warns that Western media, through  
contrived and deceptive information, has intensified the climate of  
fear that leads to attacks on innocent peoples. That letter was not  
picked up by the US news wires.

“‘Wiped Off The Map’ - The Rumor of the Century” Arash  
Norouzi, Global Research, 1/20/2007
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? 
context=viewArticle&code=NOR20070120&articleId=4527

“Full Text: The President of Iran's Letter To President Bush”  
Translated by Le Monde, Information Clearing House, 05/09/06

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12984.htm



  Vulture Funds: Devouring the Desperate

Vulture funds are companies that buy up the debt of poor nations  
cheaply when they are about to be written off and then sue for the  
full value of the debt plus interest - which might be ten times what  
they paid for it. In 1979 the Romanian government lent Zambia money  
to buy Romanian tractors. Zambia was unable to keep up the payments  
and in 1999 Romania and Zambia negotiated to liquidate the debt for  
$3m. Before the deal could be finalized a vulture fund stepped in and  
bought the debt from Romania for less than $4m. They are now suing  
the Zambian government for the original debt plus interest, which  
they calculate at over $40m and they expect to win. In 1996 the same  
company paid $11m for a discounted Peruvian debt and threatened to  
bankrupt the country unless they paid $58m. They got their $58m. Now  
they’re suing Congo Brazzaville for $400m for a debt they bought for  
$10m. Vulture funds have teams of lawyers combing the world for  
assets that can be seized. They raise most of their money through  
legal actions in US courts, where lobbying and political  
contributions hold influence.



“Vulture Fund Threat to Third World” Greg Palast, 02/14/2007

http://www.gregpalast.com/vulture-fund-threat-to-third-world/



Foreign Privatization of America’s Infrastructure

We will soon be paying Wall Street investors, Australian bankers, and  
Spanish contractors for the privilege of driving on American roads as  
more than 20 states have enacted legislation allowing public-private  
partnerships to build and run highways.  Investment firms including  
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and the Carlyle Group are approaching  
state politicians with advise to sell off extraordinarily valuable  
transportation infrastructure. When advising state officials on the  
future of this vital public asset, these investment firms fail to  
mention that their sole purpose is to pick up infrastructure at the  
lowest price possible in order to maximize returns for investors.   
Investors, more often than not foreign companies, are charging tolls  
and often insist on “noncompete” clauses that limit governments  
from expanding or improving nearby roads.  Quiet plans are underway  
for the mega-project, NAFTA Super Highway, which would run a huge,  
privatized expressway from the Mexican border to the Canadian border  
to begin construction in 2007.

“The Highwaymen” Daniel Schulman with James Ridgeway. Mother  
Jones, 2/2007
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/01/highwaymen.html
“Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway” Jerome R.  
Corsi, Human Events, 6/12/2006 http://www.humanevents.com/article.php? 
id=15497



  House of Death
  US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), part of the  
Department of Homeland Security, paid an informant more than $220,000  
to work as a spy inside a Juarez drug cartel. In August 2003, that  
informant, known as Lalo, participated in the murder of Mexican  
lawyer Fernando Reyes while working on the ICE operation. On the day  
of Reyes’s murder Lalo told his ICE employers what had happened.  
They knew that if they were to continue using him as an informant,  
they would need high-level authorization, which they received from  
the Department of Justice. Reyes murder was just one of a dozen  
murders — some of those killed were victims of mistaken identity —  
uncovered at the Juarez ‘House of Death.’  Murders were allowed to  
continue as ICE and DoJ were assembling their case against drug  
trafficking. A web of cover-up stretches from top officials in Texas,  
including Johnny Sutton, US Attorney for Western Texas and ex-adviser  
to Bush, to top Washington officials, including John Ashcroft.  
Sandalio Gonzalez, Special Agent in charge of the DEA in El Paso, was  
forced to resign after placing formal complaints regarding the  
official handling of the House of Death case.


“The House of Death” David Rose, The Observer UK, 12/3/2006

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/world/story/0,,1962643,00.html
“DEA's national security claim in House of Death murders exposed as  
bogus”

Bill Conroy, Narconews.com, 1/6/2007
http://narcosphere.narconews.com/story/2007/1/6/213919/8689
Article series: http://www.narconews.com/houseofdeath



Bush Regulates Regulation

President Bush has signed a directive that gives the White House much  
greater control over the rules and policy statements that the  
government develops to protect public health, safety, the  
environment, civil rights and privacy.  In an executive order issued  
January 18, Bush announced that each agency must have a regulatory  
policy office run by a political appointee, to supervise the  
development of rules and documents providing guidance to regulated  
industries. The White House will thus have a gatekeeper in each  
agency to analyze the costs and the benefits of new rules and to make  
sure the agencies carry out the president’s priorities. Chairman of  
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Congressman Henry  
Waxman, remarked, “The executive order allows the political staff at  
the White House to dictate decisions on health and safety issues,  
even if the government’s own impartial experts disagree. This is a  
terrible way to govern, but great news for special interests.”

“Executive Order Expands Presidential Power Over Agencies”  
Michelle Chen, New Standard, Jan. 24, 2007
http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/4173
“Bush Directive Increases Sway on Regulation” Robert Pear, New  
York Times, 1/29/2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/30/washington/30rules.html? 
ei=5070&en=24f1170f12cae607&ex=1172034000&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1171914833-6l 
KwqTnW+2ni/k6dOjwyjw&pagewanted=print


  Detonations in Puget Sound

  The U.S. Navy sets off between 180 and 300 underwater explosive  
charges each year in some of the most sensitive waters of Puget  
Sound, a designated Essential Fish Habitat under the Sustainable  
Fisheries Act. Since 2002, the National Marine Fisheries Service  
(NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the two civilian  
agencies charged with enforcing the Endangered Species Act, have  
urged the Navy to undertake alternative training practices to  
minimize damage to marine life or to conduct these detonations in  
less sensitive waters. Measures to comply have yet to materialize.  
“Why are taxpayers spending millions to preserve Puget Sound when  
another government agency is busy blowing it up?” asked Washington  
PEER Director Sue Gunn, noting that the Navy is resisting her  
document requests filed under the Freedom of Information Act for the  
Navy’s own studies. “National security does not demand that the  
Navy inflict maximum environmental damage in the waters it is  
supposed to defend.”


“Navy Continues up to 300 Detonations Per Year in Puget Sound”  
PEER, 7/3/2007
http://www.peer.org/news/print_detail.php?row_id=708

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to