http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=51&ItemID=12812
University of Mass Destruction: UC Students Demanding No More Nukes In Our
Name! by Will Parrish
May 13, 2007
Printer Friendly Version
EMail Article to a Friend
For over six decades, the University of California has been the United States
governments primary nuclear weapons research and design contractor. It has
managed the Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore nuclear weapons compounds since
their inceptions. Scientists at these laboratories UC employees, all have
designed every nuclear warhead in the US arsenal, of which there have been 65
designated types (1). UC nuclear weaponeers have also carried out close to
every US nuclear weapons test detonation since the dawn of the Nuclear Age, of
which the official tally is 1,054.(2)
The fealty of the UC Board of Regents to the nuclear industry is such that,
during Fiscal Year 2005-06, the UC received almost as much money from the
Department of Energy to conduct nuclear weapons programs ($2.76 billion) as it
received from the State of California for education ($2.85 billion).(3)
On Wednesday, May 9th, 41 UC students, alumni, and faculty members began a
hunger strike to demand that the UC retract its management of the Los Alamos
and Livermore labs. The hunger strike marks a new approach for a
student-driven UC labs severance campaign that has taken place for the past
five years. Individuals at four campuses Berkeley, Santa Cruz, San
Francisco, and Santa Barbara -- are part of the hunger strike roster. They are
being joined by one solidarity faster in Albuquerque.
This bold act of civil resistance comes at a critical time. In March, the US
Nuclear Weapons Council, an interagency committee of executives from the
Departments of Defense and Energy, announced that the UC's Livermore facility
would develop a new hydrogen bomb. Officially, this is to be the first new US
nuclear weapon since the end of the Cold War.
Los Alamos is slated to manufacture the plutonium bomb cores, or "pits," for
these weapons. Owing in part to its technical complexity and political
baggage, pit manufacturing is the pivotal step in creating a new generation of
nuclear bombs.(4)
The larger context for these programs is that the US nuclear weapons complex
is attempting to renew itself, to prepare its infrastructure and employees for
the task of building dozens of new nukes a year by the year 2030. The
Department of Energy (DOE) has outlined that plan in its Complex 2030
document, released this past November.(5)
The UC stands to play a central role in these developments. But it is
instructive to note that the Regents do not really manage LANL and LLNL in
any meaningful sense. As a UC faculty committee observed in 1970, the UCs
role at the weapons labs is akin to that of a benevolent absentee landlord.
The Regents rubber-stamp everything the labs do, providing no actual oversight
of their programs and policies -- precisely as the (DOE) requires of them.
From the perspective of the DOE, then, what is the benefit of UC weapons lab
management, or the illusion thereof? As the largest public research university
system in the world, the UC provides the ultimate fig leaf of academic
respectability to nuclear weapons science. Over 30 years ago, the late
grassroots organization the UC Nuclear Weapons Labs Conversion Project noted:
The UC does not manage the nuclear weapons labs, but rather the public
relations about the weapons labs. By casting the UCs intellectual and
political capital on the side of the nuclear weapons industry, the Regents help
to legitimize everything these labs do.
By contrast, if the Regents withdrew their management of LANL and LLNL, they
would effectively do the opposite: They would provide the weapons labs with the
worst publicity possible. The political consequences of their doing so would
be vast. A major crisis would ensue for the nuclear weapons complex. Congress
might awaken to the necessity of overseeing the labs work in a more meaningful
way. Morale among lab workers would plunge. The public discourse about
nuclear weapons would shift in a small but significant way. Those who favor
disarmament would have achieved a major victory that they could mobilize in
their effort to eliminate nuclear weapons once and for all.
That is particularly so at this critical juncture. The Regents have rarely
been more politically vulnerable in their capacity as nukes lab managers. The
labs' new hydrogen bomb program, misleadingly referred to as the Reliable
Replacement Warhead (RRW), has virtually no technical justification and is
clearly contrary to the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which commits
the US to pursuing negotiations in good faith for nuclear disarmament. The
RRW is deeply unpopular even among many long-time nuclear weapons supporters.
It is even opposed by The Navy.(6)
If the RRW dies, the US nuclear weapons complex will be, in turn, one step
closer to the grave. One of the complexs dirty secrets is that it is
currently in a state of crisis. The post-Cold War world is producing
increasingly few young scientists interested in working on nuclear weapons.
Many of the weapons labs projects lack a clear purpose and a clear goal. UC
weapons lab severance would cause this crisis to deepen appreciably.
The day prior to the hunger strike, the UC officially received a new
contract, only with a twist: It will manage the lab as part of a
limited-liability corporation with Bechtel Corporation, two other
multi-national firms, and Texas A&M University. In 2006, UC-Bechtels Los
Alamos Security, LLC likewise took over from the UC alone as manager of Los
Alamos. The contradictions of UC weapons lab management, thus, have never been
greater.
The focus of the UC hunger strike is, in many ways, the UC Regents meeting at
UC San Francisco on Thursday, May 17th. Hunger strikers, hundreds of their
supporters at UC campuses, and other supportive activists and individuals
throughout California will mobilize for direct action at the meeting. In the
meantime, we are attempting by every non-violent means possible to pressure The
Regents to sever their nuclear ties. If The Regents fail to withdraw their
weapons lab management, many of those participating (including the author) have
pledged to sustain their hunger fasts indefinitely.
We invite everyone who supports a livable future to support this effort in
any way you can. There are endless ways to do so. For more information,
please visit nonukeshungerstrike.blogspot.com and www.ucnuclearfree.org, or
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will Parrish is an alumnus of UC Santa Cruz, a coordinator of the UC Nuclear
Free campaign (www.ucnuclearfree.org), and an anti-war organizer living in
Santa Barbara, CA.
http://www.brook.edu/fp/projects/nucwcost/50.htm
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/index.html
http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/regents/regmeet/nov06/502attach.pdf
http://www.lasg.org
http://www.fcnl.org/issues/item.php?item_id=2159&issue_id=51
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR2007030301077.html
---------------------------------
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
