Hi. Today, congress votes on Iraq war funding.  See "Vote No!", at
the bottom for immediate and ongoing actions opposing this disaster.
Now, for chapter ad infinitum, here's Lebonan.  -Ed

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3403418,00.html

Hizbullah supports Lebanese army in stand-off

Ynet News   05.22.07, 18:43 / Israel News

The Shiite Hizbullah has so far backed Lebanon's army in its confrontation
with a Fatah Islam, a Sunni militant group inside a refugee camp - despite
the fact that Hizbullah has been pushing to topple Lebanon's government.

"We feel that there is someone out there who wants to drag the army to this
confrontation and bloody struggle ... To serve well-known projects and aims.
We are hearing calls for more escalation and fighting, which will ultimately
lead to more chaos and confrontation in Lebanon," the Hizbullah statement
said. It called for a political solution to the crisis. (AP)

***

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Hersh_Bush_arranged_support_for_militants_0522.html

Hersh: Bush administration arranged support for militants attacking Lebanon

David Edwards and Muriel Kane

THE RAW STORY   Tuesday May 22, 2007

In an interview on CNN International's Your World Today, veteran journalist
Seymour Hersh explains that the current violence in Lebanon is the result of
an attempt by the Lebanese government to crack down on a militant Sunni
group, Fatah al-Islam, that it formerly supported.

Last March, Hersh reported that American policy in the Middle East had
shifted to opposing Iran, Syria, and their Shia allies at any cost, even if
it meant backing hardline Sunni jihadists.

A key element of this policy shift was an agreement among Vice President
Dick Cheney, Deputy National Security Advisor Elliot Abrams, and Prince
Bandar bin Sultan, the Saudi national security adviser, whereby the Saudis
would covertly fund the Sunni Fatah al-Islam in Lebanon as a counterweight
to the Shia Hezbollah.

Hersh points out that the current situation is much like that during the
conflict in Afghanistan in the 1980's - which gave rise to al Qaeda - with
the same people involved in both the US and Saudi Arabia and the "same
pattern" of the US using jihadists that the Saudis assure us they can
control.

When asked why the administration would be acting in a way that appears to
run counter to US interests, Hersh says that, since the Israelis lost to
them last summer, "the fear of Hezbollah in Washington, particularly in the
White House, is acute."

As a result, Hersh implies, the Bush administration is no longer acting
rationally in its policy. "We're in the business of supporting the Sunnis
anywhere we can against the Shia. ... "We're in the business of creating ...
sectarian violence." And he describes the scheme of funding Fatah al-Islam
as "a covert program we joined in with the Saudis as part of a bigger,
broader program of doing everything we could to stop the spread of the Shia
world, and it just simply -- it bit us in the rear."

SEE VIDEO HERE :
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Hersh_Bush_arranged_support_for_militants_0522.html

RUSH TRANSCRIPT

HALA GORANI: Well, investigative journalist Seymour Hersh reported back in
March that in order to defeate Hezbollah, the Lebanese government supported
a Sunni militant group, the same ones they're fighting today. Seymour joins
us live from Washington. Thanks for being with us. What is the source of the
financing according to your reporting on these groups, such as Fatah
al-Islam in these camps of Nahr el Bared, for instance? Where are they
getting the money and where are they getting the arms?

SEYMOUR HERSH: The key player is the Saudis. What I was writing about was
sort of a private agreement that was made between the White House, we're
talking about Richard -- Dick -- Cheney and Elliott Abrams, one of the key
aides in the White House, with Bandar. And the idea was to get support,
covert support from the Saudis, to support various hard-line jihadists,
Sunni groups, particularly in Lebanon, who would be seen in case of an
actual confrontation with Hezbollah -- the Shia group in the southern
Lebanon -- would be seen as an asset, as simple as that.

GORANI: The Senora government, in order to counter the influence of
Hezbollah in Lebanon would be covertly according to your reporting funding
groups like Fatah al-Islam that they're having issues with right now?

HERSH: Unintended consequences once again, yes.

GORANI: And so if Saudi Arabia and the Senora government are doing this,
whether it's unintended or not, therefore it has the United States must have
something to say about it or not?

HERSH: Well, the United States was deeply involved. This was a covert
operation that Bandar ran with us. Don't forget, if you remember, you know,
we got into the war in Afghanistan with supporting Osama bin Laden, the
mujahadin back in the late 1980s with Bandar and with people like Elliott
Abrams around, the idea being that the Saudis promised us they could
control -- they could control the jihadists so we spent a lot of money and
time, the United States in the late 1980s using and supporting the jihadists
to help us beat the Russians in Afghanistan and they turned on us. And we
have the same pattern, not as if there's any lessons learned. It's the same
pattern, using the Saudis again to support jihadists, Saudis assuring us
they can control these various group, the groups like the one that is in
contact right now in Tripoli with the government.

GORANI: Sure, but the mujahadin in the '80s was one era. Why would it be in
the best interest of the United States of America right now to indirectly
even if it is indirect empower these jihadi movements that are extremists
that fight to the death in these Palestinian camps? Doesn't it go against
the interests not only of the Senora government but also of America and
Lebanon now?

HERSH: The enemy of our enemy is our friend, much as the jihadist groups in
Lebanon were also there to go after Nasrullah. Hezbollah, if you remember,
last year defeated Israel, whether the Israelis want to acknowledge it, so
you have in Hezbollah, a major threat to the American -- look, the American
role is very simple. Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state, has been very
articulate about it. We're in the business now of supporting the Sunnis
anywhere we can against the Shia, against the Shia in Iran, against the Shia
in Lebanon, that is Nasrullah. Civil war. We're in a business of creating in
some places, Lebanon in particular, a sectarian violence.

GORANI: The Bush administration, of course, officials would disagree with
that, so would the Senora government, openly pointing the finger at Syria,
saying this is an offshoot of a Syrian group, Fatah al-Islam is, where else
would it get its arms from if not Syria.

HERSH: You have to answer this question. If that's true, Syria which is
close -- and criticized greatly by the Bush administration for being very
close -- to Hezbollah would also be supporting groups, Salafist groups --
the logic breaks down. What it is simply is a covert program we joined in
with the Saudis as part of a bigger broader program of doing everything we
could to stop the spread of the Shia, the Shia world, and it bit us in the
rear, as it's happened before.

GORANI: Sure, but if it doesn't make any sense for the Syrians to support
them, why would it make any sense for the U.S. to indirectly, of course, to
support, according to your reporting, by giving a billion dollars in aid,
part of it military, to the Senora government -- and if that is dispensed in
a way that that government and the U.S. is not controlling extremist groups,
then indirectly the United States, according to the article you wrote, would
be supporting them. So why would it be in their best interest and what
should it do according to the people you've spoken to?

HERSH: You're assuming logic by the United States government. That's okay.
We'll forget that one right now. Basically it's very simple. These groups
are seeing -- when I was in Beirut doing interviews, I talked to officials
who acknowledged the reason they were tolerating the radical jihadist groups
was because they were seen as a protection against Hezbollah. The fear of
Hezbollah in Washington, particularly in the White House, is acute. They
just simply believe that Hassan Nasrallah is intent on waging war in
America. Whether it's true or not is another question. There is a supreme
overwhelming fear of Hezbollah and we do not want Hezbollah to play an
active role in the government in Lebanon and that's been our policy,
basically, which is support the Senora government, despite its weakness
against the coalition. Not only Senora but Mr. Ahun, former military leader
of Lebanon. There in a coalition that we absolutely abhor.

GORANI: All right, Seymour Hersh of "The New Yorker" magazine, thanks for
joining us there and hopefully we'll be able to speak a little bit in a few
months' time when those developments take shape in Lebanon and we know more.
Thanks very much.

HERSH: glad to talk to you.

   RESEARCH AND INFORMATION NETWORK  (RAIN)
                        Director : Abie Dawjee
P O Box 26119, Isipingo Beach, Durban, South Africa 4115.
tel: 0027 31 9029174.                       fax: 0866893206.
mobile: 082 352 352 6                 e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*********************************************************************

From: Leslie Cagan, UFPJ
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:01 PM
Subject: Ed , Make Them Hear Your Outrage!

Please circulate widely

Thursday, Congress will vote on another $100 billion for the war in Iraq.

We urge you to call your senators and representative NOW. Call 202-224-3121
and ask to be connected to their offices.

·         Tell them to VOTE NO on the war funding bill.

·         Voting for it DOES NOT support the troops; it supports a
disastrous war and occupation.

We're frustrated. You're frustrated. We all have called, written, marched,
rallied, sat-in, and vigiled. Last November the voters of this country made
their views very clear, yet the war goes on. And now, rather than holding
the Bush administration accountable for their failed policy in Iraq,
Congress may simply blame the country we invaded and continue to occupy.
That's right -- the new funding bill that Congress will vote on tomorrow
requires the Iraqi government to pass laws the U.S. wants them to pass in
order to prove that they are a democracy or our government will withhold
funding for much-needed reconstruction.

For months the Congressional leadership promised action to change the course
in Iraq, promised they will hold Bush accountable, promised they would not
give Bush a blank check. But now, instead of standing up for what's right,
the Democratic leadership has caved in to Bush. They are giving him a check
for $100 billion to continue and further EXPAND the war. That surge they all
claimed they don't like? The money for it is in this bill!

LET THEM HEAR YOUR OUTRAGE!

And, most importantly, don't give up!
While the pace of change in the Congress has been glacial, we need to see
what's been positive and build from that. There has been more debate,
discussion and voting on Iraq in Congress over the last 5 months than in the
last 5 years. There have been some significant votes that show momentum is
going our way. Obviously not as quickly or substantively as we want and
need, but we -- the antiwar movement active in every state of the nation --
are slowly but surely forcing a change.

The funding in this current bill will run out in September, and Bush has
already asked for another $145 billion to keep the war going. We will need
to use our time and energy over the next three months to increase our power,
show our outrage and put greater pressure on Congress to stand up to Bush.

WHAT CAN WE DO?

1) Make those calls to Congress today (202-224-3121). Yes, they do make a
difference!!

2) Use this Memorial Day as an opportunity to ask your members of
Congress -- how many more U.S. soldiers will we be honoring next year for
making the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq? Isn't it time for those we elected to
truly represent us and use their power to end this war? Use any means you
can to ask these questions! Letters to the editor, signs hanging from
highway overpasses, banners and signs at parades, speeches, your front lawn.
Your members of Congress will be in their home districts next week, so be
sure to visit and call their local offices. Don't let them return to
Washington without hearing your voice and feeling your frustration! Get the
message out!

3) Download, copy and circulate the People's Emergency Funding Bill, and use
it as a tool to help you talk to people.

4) Check our calendar for activities over the Memorial Day weekend and the
coming weeks, and please be sure to post any events you are organizing or
know about on there too! If you're in the Northeast, join the protest
against Dick Cheney's graduation speech at West Point on Saturday, 5/26.

5) After you've visited your members of Congress in their local offices, if
you can, follow them back to Washington! Peace activists are surging on the
Capitol with Marine mom Tina Richards to keep the pressure on Congress
throughout June and July. UFPJ member group CODEPINK is hosting an activist
house and trainings over the summer. And there's still time for students to
apply to attend the one-week Iraq Action Camp, June 10-14, sponsored by
Campus Progress Action and Move On Civic Action.





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to