----- Original Message ----- 
From: jubilee shine 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: [DopeXResistance-L.A.] Black Sentinel gets in ted hayes ass

                 
                        The 'Choose Black America' Anti-Immigration Ploy: Is 
Ted Hayes the New Ward Connerly? 
                             
                        by Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad    
                       
                        Jun 27, 2007 at 05:13 PM 
                       
                        Illegal immigration reform is a salient issue in 
America today. Particularly among the Republicans who consider this issue “a 
border crisis.” Congress’ effort to legislate a solution was met with a last 
minute Republican filibuster stalled a viable solution to addressing the 12 
million resident aliens in the country, a measured naturalization process for 
those who qualified. It was said that it was too much like amnesty. But now the 
Republicans have pulled out their latest secret weapon, former homeless 
advocate now Black Republican, Ted Hayes. Hayes, who came to the nation’s 
attention as a homeless advocate in the 1990s, has abandoned the homeless 
movement that has taken on a disproportionately African American hue (at a time 
when Los Angeles is the homeless capital of the nation) for a new “Black 
movement.” Illegal immigration. Hayes, the only homeless advocate I ever knew 
to have Laker floor seats, and the only one to take homeless people on a field 
hockey trip to Europe, never engaged in anything “Black” when he was a homeless 
advocate. But now he wants to be the African American voice standing arm and 
arm with the Minutemen movement, border patrol civilians who take it as their 
civil right to defend their property. Here’s a man who claims to have no 
property, representing (or used to represent) property-less people, suddenly 
looking to protect the rights of property owners and national citizenship. 
What’s wrong with this picture? 

                        Or maybe the more relevant question is, what’s behind 
it? Ted Hayes, coincidentally, has become a Republican and has interjected 
himself in a fight that has a racial element—White conservative “minuteman” 
protecting America from illegal invasion that assaults their “American values.” 
Though Mexican immigrants represent less than forty percent of all the illegal 
immigrants that enter the nation each year, they’re the only ones being called 
out. And the Southern border is the only one being “walled off” while the 
Northern border remains open to the same terrorist threats. There’s something 
openly racist about this. So what better way to hide the hypocrisy of this 
contradiction than to interject a counter-racial component, that Blacks are 
being hurt by illegal immigration. The same argument, and the same strategy was 
used a dozen years ago, when Affirmative Action came under attack. Being 
attacked by Whites made it a race issue that would be perceived as “racial” so 
Republican conservatives came up with a Black face to sell a bad bill of 
goods—that affirmative action was bad for everybody, including Blacks. Ward 
Connerly became the face of the anti-affirmative action movement and the 
“colorblind” politic has led to the deconstruction of affirmative action. Ted 
Hayes and his “Choose Black” politic is becoming to the anti-immigration 
movement what Ward Connerly’s “Civil Rights” initiative was to the 
Anti-Affirmative Action movement. Connerly is paid, by conservative think tanks 
and Republican policy forums, over a million dollars a year to overturn 
affirmative action state by state. How much is a homeless man being paid to go 
around the nation to round (or rouse) up Blacks against immigration reform? Ted 
Hayes is on record stating that “illegal immigration is the biggest threat to 
Blacks since slavery.” But we know the biggest threat to Blacks has been this 
colorblindness that Republican conservatives use these new Black Republicans to 
espouse policies that undermine the progress of the historical race disparities 
African Americans have spent 140 years trying to make up. And with GOP support, 
suddenly Ted Hayes is “Black” again. 
                        For the last year, as immigrants have pressed the 
citizenship question and others have tried to press African Americans into a 
position on this, I’ve insisted that this is not our issue. There is nothing to 
be lost, or gained, in African Americans coming out for, or against, 
immigration reform. There are more issues that impact African Americans 
nationally that we could be vocal about. Immigration reform is not one of them. 
It’s an issue for conservatives concerned about illegal immigration’s impact on 
national security. For social and fiscal moderates, it’s the economy and 
immigration’s impact on the suppression of wages. Both are legitimate issues. 
However, for poor people—the issue has been around the competition for jobs and 
the illusion that immigrants are taking jobs from good hardworking Americans. I 
say this position is illusionary because immigrants aren’t taking jobs from 
Blacks or anybody else. They make jobs where there are no jobs, and only take 
jobs for wages that nobody will work for, including Blacks. Moreover, Blacks 
and Latinos both are impacted by wage suppression that using illegal labor 
brings about. Attacking each other would benefit neither, and most Black and 
Latino groups recognize this. So far, every time Hayes has showed up somewhere 
with his “Choose Black” rhetoric, he is met with greater number of unified 
Black and Latino groups working together to improve economic injustice in poor 
communities. If choosing “Black America” is the advocation, why would it be 
choose illegal immigration over the economic exploitation that promotes the 
wage suppression and wealth disparities that exploit both races. If Hayes wants 
to advocate for justice, why would he side with the injustice that continues to 
blame the poor for the nation’s problems when the top one percent of population 
hold 40 percent of the wealth? Maybe it’s because the pay is better to advocate 
against the poor and oppressed than it is to advocate with them. Hayes would 
have much more credibility advocating for the homeless. 

                        But he’s given up the homeless gig for one that pays 
better, attacking immigrants and trying to interject Blacks in the conflict to 
deflect attention anyway from those who have issue with Mexican immigrants—but 
none of the other immigrants coming into the country. Hayes’ anti-immigration 
advocacy is a ploy that most Blacks aren’t buying into. But, like Ward Connerly 
before him, Hayes has been bought and sold to the anti-immigration forces as 
“the Blackface” in the movement. It’s worked before. 

                        Dr. Anthony Asadullah Samad n is a national columnist, 
managing director of the Urban Issues Forum (www.urbanissuesforum.com) and 
author of the upcoming book, “Saving The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom.” He 
can be reached at www.AnthonySamad.com. 
                       
                        Last Updated ( Jun 27, 2007 at 05:15 PM )  
                 
           
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to