California Restricts Voting Machines

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: August 4, 2007

Filed at 10:55 a.m. ET
<http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Voting-Machines.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin#secondParagraph>Skip
 
to next paragraph


Related




<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/us/28vote.html>Scientists' Tests 
Hack Into Electronic Voting Machines in California and Elsewhere 
(July 28, 2007)

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) -- California's top elections official placed 
rigorous security conditions on voting equipment used in dozens of 
counties and limited the use of two of the most widely used machines statewide.

Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced the measures minutes before 
midnight Friday, making good on a promise to tell counties at least 
six months before California's Feb. 5 presidential primary if their 
voting equipment would be decertified.

The announcement leaves the most affected counties with little time 
to find alternate equipment in time for the primary. The decision 
follows an eight-week security review of voting systems used in all 
but a few of California's 58 counties.

<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_california/index.html?inline=nyt-org>University
 
of California computer experts found that voting machines sold by 
three companies -- Diebold Election Systems, Hart InterCivic and 
Sequoia Voting Systems -- were vulnerable to hackers and that voting 
results could be altered.

Bowen said she had decertified the machines, then recertified them on 
the condition they meet her new security standards. She also limited 
the Diebold and Sequoia machines to one per polling place. That will 
force some counties to find replacement equipment on a tight schedule.

Bowen ordered the review, which was released last week, to ensure 
California would not face the same doubts about the accuracy of its 
voting systems that hit Florida after the 2000 election and Ohio in 2004.

The additional requirements she imposed included banning all modem or 
wireless connections to the machines to prevent them from being 
linked to an outside computer or the Internet. She also required a 
full manual count of all votes cast on Diebold or Sequoia machines to 
ensure accuracy.

Bowen said the study revealed some vulnerabilities that would allow 
hackers to manipulate the systems ''with little chance of detection 
and with dire consequences.'' Her review also found that the machines 
posed problems for disabled voters.

Company officials have downplayed the results of Bowen's review, 
saying they reflected unrealistic, worst-case scenarios that would be 
counteracted by security measures taken by the companies and local 
election officials.

Officials with Sequoia said they were disappointed with Bowen's 
withdrawal of the company's certification but would make necessary 
improvements. They said their equipment is accurate and secure.

Hart InterCivic issued a news release defending its equipment and 
promising to comply with Bowen's requirements.

A message left with Diebold early Saturday was not immediately returned.

Machines made by a fourth company, Election Systems & Software, were 
not included in the review because it was late providing information 
the secretary of state's office needed, said Nicole Winger, a 
spokeswoman for Bowen.

The secretary of state launched a separate review of that company's 
Inkavote Plus system, which is used only in Los Angeles County. On 
Friday, Bowen said she had decertified that equipment but would 
review and reconsider it.

A message l


John Johnson
Change-Links Progressive Newspaper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://change-links.org
Subscribe to our list server. Email  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(818) 782-1412
Cell (818) 681-7448.

===



  ----------



No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.4/936 - Release Date: 8/4/2007 2:42 PM


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to