----- Original Message ----- 
From: JOHN
To: PEACE

How often do we hear that there are Israelis opposed to their own 
government?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: World View
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 1:11 AM
Subject: [wvns] Israeli Aid Convoy Blocked from Gaza


The Israeli Relief Convoy was on its way
Saturday 26/01/08
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/events/1201433012

The initiative for the large action that took place today (26.1.08)
started when the well-know psychiatrist, Dr. Eyad al-Sarraj, the
human-rights activist from Gaza, met in the Gush Shalom office with a
small group of Israeli peace activists, in order to tell them about
the desperate situation in the strip. It was decided on the spot to
organize in Israel a relief convoy for the Gaza Strip people, and to
fight by all political and juridical means for the right to get it in.
It was agreed that two parallel protest rallies would be held
simultaneously on the two sides of the wall.

26 Israeli peace groups joined the initiative, under the single
slogan: "Gaza: Lift the siege!" Many activists from different
organizations worked day and night. Gush Shalom prepared a special
poster and started a fund-raising campaign among its sympathizers.
Hundreds of checks came pouring in from Israel and a dozen other
countries, enabling the Gush to carry alone the full costs of the
supplies. Many added words of thanks for the opportunity given them to
express their opinion this way and join the struggle.

Warm thanks to all of them!

In consultation with Dr. al-Sarraj it was decided to buy not only five
tons of essential foodstuffs - flour, sugar, rice, oil, salt, beans
and lentils - but also water distillers. "The water in the Gaza Strip
is undrinkable," al-Sarraj reported, "therefore there is an urgent
need for distillers."

The weather forecasts promised rain and thunderstorms all over the
country. In spite of this, old and young peace activists came to the
starting points in six towns. As requested by the organizers, hundreds
of families came in their private cars. Together with the people who
came by bus, their number reached about two thousand.

"In the night we were woken up by strong thunderbolts. It started to
rain cats and dogs, and we were very worried: who is going to get up
early on Shabbat morning in such stormy weather in order to
participate in an open-air protest rally and carry sacks of food?"
recounted one of the organizers.

Ya'akov Manor had the idea to ask the demonstrators to bring private
relief parcels and to add personal letters "from family to family".
The response was beyond all expectations. Families brought not only
food and mineral water, but also blankets, warm clothing and many
other useful articles, even electrical stoves. The parcels were
fastened to the tops of the cars or put in the baggage holds of the
buses. They added up to two tons.

When the demonstrators assembled in the towns - Tel Aviv, Jerusalem,
Haifa, Nazareth and others - a slight rain was falling. But all who
hoped for a brightening up were soon disappointed: during the drive to
the Erez border crossing, a very heavy rain started to pour down,
making it almost impossible to see the road, and slowed down the huge
convoy towards the Gaza strip extremely difficult.

About half of the protesters were Jewish, the other half Arab. The
rally was conducted the same way: Side by side with the Jewish
speakers - Uri Avnery, Nurit Peled-Elhanan, Professor Jeff Halper and
former minister Shulamit Aloni (who was ill and sent a written speech,
read by Teddy Katz), speeches were made by advocate Fatmeh al-Ijou,
and MKs Izzam Mahul and Jamal Zahalke.

At the height of the rally, the moderator, Huloud al-Badawi, called
Dr. Sarraj by cellular phone. He was participating at the parallel
rally in Gaza and his words were conveyed by loudspeaker. They
amounted to a stirring call to the Israeli peace camp to support the
Palestinians in their struggle against the blockade.

A sensation was caused by a young woman from Sderot, Shir Shusdig, who
called out: "For seven years I am suffering from the Qassams in
Kibbutz Zikim and Sderot. I know that the people on the other side are
also suffering very much. That's why I am here!"

Jeff Halper mentioned that demonstrations of solidarity with the
people of Gaza were taking place in dozens of cities around the world.
Advocate al-Ijou pointed out that the Attorney General had asserted in
a Supreme Court hearing that the blockade on Gaza was similar to the
boycott against the former apartheid regime in South Africa. "This is
absurd when it comes from a government which is building apartheid
roads all over the West Bank!"

Miraculously, the rain stopped just before the rally, and started
again a few minutes after it was finished.

Since the Israeli army has not allowed the relief supplies into the
Gaza strip, they were stored in a neighboring kibbutz. If the military
will not permit their transfer to Gaza in the next two days, we shall
apply to the High Court of Justice and start a legal fight until we
succeed.

===

Uri Avnery's speech at the rally:

Three days ago, a wall fell here - Just as the Berlin Wall fell, Just
as the apartheid wall will fall, And just as all walls and fences in
this country Will come down.

But the inhuman blockade That has been imposed on A million and a half
human beings in Gaza By our government By our army, In our name - This
siege is continuing in its full cruelty. We, Israelis from various
political camps, Have come to bring basic supplies And to say to the
Israeli public And to the whole world: We will not participate in
crime! We are ashamed of the blockade!"

Our hearts are with our Palestinian brothers Who are at this moment
demonstrating with us On the other side of the fence - Don't lose
faith that one day We will meet together in this place Without fences,
without walls, Without violence, Without fighting, The sons of two
peoples living next to each other In peace, in friendship, in partnership.

Our hearts are with our brothers, the residents of Sderot - The threat
of Qassams must stop! It won't stop by a policy of "an eye for an
eye", Or a hundred eyes for one eye, Or a thousand eyes for one eye,
Because that only leaves us all blind. It will end when we speak to
the other side - Yes, yes, even with Hamas! And we'll together create
a total and mutual ceasefire - Without Qassams, without murderous
incursions, Without mortars, without extrajudicial assassinations,
Without blockade, without starvation.

This is our call, this is our demand: Set up an immediate ceasefire!
Open the crossings immediately! Make peace with all parts of the
Palestinian people! MAKE PEACE!"

===

Worse than a Crime

26/01/08

IT LOOKED like the fall of the Berlin wall. And not only did it look
like it. For a moment, the Rafah crossing was the Brandenburg Gate.

It is impossible not to feel exhilaration when masses of oppressed and
hungry people break down the wall that is shutting them in, their eyes
radiant, embracing everybody they meet - to feel so even when it is
your own government that erected the wall in the first place.

The Gaza Strip is the largest prison on earth. The breaking of the
Rafah wall was an act of liberation. It proves that an inhuman policy
is always a stupid policy: no power can stand up against a mass of
people that has crossed the border of despair.

That is the lesson of Gaza, January, 2008.

ONE MIGHT repeat the famous saying of the French statesman Boulay de
la Meurthe, slightly amended: It is worse than a war crime, it is a
blunder!

Months ago, the two Ehuds - Barak and Olmert - imposed a blockade on
the Gaza Strip, and boasted about it. Lately they have tightened the
deadly noose even more, so that hardly anything at all could be
brought into the Strip. Last week they made the blockade absolute - no
food, no medicines. Things reached a climax when they stopped the
fuel, too. Large areas of Gaza remained without electricity -
incubators for premature babies, dialysis machines, pumps for water
and sewage. Hundreds of thousands remained without heating in the
severe cold, unable to cook, running out of food.

Again and again, Aljazeera broadcast the pictures into millions of
homes in the Arab world. TV stations all over the world showed them,
too. From Casablanca to Amman angry mass protest broke out and
frightened the authoritarian Arab regimes. Hosny Mubarak called Ehud
Barak in panic. That evening Barak was compelled to cancel, at least
temporarily, the fuel-blockade he had imposed in the morning. Apart
from that, the blockade remained total.

It is hard to imagine a more stupid act.

THE REASON given for the starving and freezing of one and a half
million human beings, crowded into a territory of 365 square
kilometers, is the continued shooting at the town of Sderot and the
adjoining villages.

That is a well-chosen reason. It unites the primitive and poor parts
of the Israeli public. It blunts the criticism of the UN and the
governments throughout the world, who might otherwise have spoken out
against a collective punishment that is, undoubtedly, a war crime
under international law.

A clear picture is presented to the world: the Hamas terror regime in
Gaza launches missiles at innocent Israeli civilians. No government in
the world can tolerate the bombardment of its citizens from across the
border. The Israeli military has not found a military answer to the
Qassam missiles. Therefore there is no other way than to exert such
strong pressure on the Gaza population as to make them rise up against
Hamas and compel them to stop the missiles.

The day the Gaza electricity works stopped operating, our military
correspondents were overjoyed: only two Qassams were launched from the
Strip. So it works! Ehud Barak is a genius!

But the day after, 17 Qassams landed, and the joy evaporated.
Politicians and generals were (literally) out of their minds: one
politician proposed to "act crazier than them", another proposed to
"shell Gaza's urban area indiscriminately for every Qassam launched",
a famous professor (who is a little bit deranged) proposed the
exercise of "ultimate evil".

The government scenario was a repeat of Lebanon War II (the report
about which is due to be published in a few days). Then: Hizbullah
captured two soldiers on the Israeli side of the border, now: Hamas
fired on towns and villages on the Israeli side of the border. Then:
the government decide in haste to start a war, now: the government
decided in haste to impose a total blockade. Then: the government
ordered the massive bombing of the civilian population in order to get
them to pressure Hizbullah, now: the government decided to cause
massive suffering of the civilian population in order to get them to
pressure Hamas.

The results were the same in both cases: the Lebanese population did
not rise up against Hizbullah, but on the contrary, people of all
religious communities united behind the Shiite organization. Hassan
Nasrallah became the hero of the entire Arab world. And now: the
population unites behind Hamas and accuses Mahmoud Abbas of
cooperation with the enemy. A mother who has no food for her children
does not curse Ismail Haniyeh, she curses Olmert, Abbas and Mubarak.

SO WHAT to do? After all, it is impossible to tolerate the suffering
of the inhabitants of Sderot, who are under constant fire.

What is being hidden from the embittered public is that the launching
of the Qassams could be stopped tomorrow morning.

Several months ago Hamas proposed a cease-fire. It repeated the offer
this week.

A cease-fire means, in the view of Hamas: the Palestinians will stop
shooting Qassams and mortar shells, the Israelis will stop the
incursions into Gaza, the "targeted" assassinations and the blockade.

Why doesn't our government jump at this proposal?

Simple: in order to make such a deal, we must speak with Hamas,
directly or indirectly. And this is precisely what the government
refuses to do.

Why? Simple again: Sderot is only a pretext - much like the two
captured soldiers were a pretext for something else altogether. The
real purpose of the whole exercise is to overthrow the Hamas regime in
Gaza and to prevent a Hamas takeover in the West Bank.

In simple and blunt words: the government sacrifices the fate of the
Sderot population on the altar of a hopeless principle. It is more
important for the government to boycott Hamas - because it is now the
spearhead of Palestinian resistance - than to put an end to the
suffering of Sderot. All the media cooperate with this pretence.

IT HAS been said before that it is dangerous to write satire in our
country - too often the satire becomes reality. Some readers may
recall a satirical article I wrote months ago. In it I described the
situation in Gaza as a scientific experiment designed to find out how
far one can go, in starving a civilian population and turning their
lives into hell, before they raise their hands in surrender.

This week, the satire has become official policy. Respected
commentators declared explicitly that Ehud Barak and the army chiefs
are working on the principle of "trial and error" and change their
methods daily according to results. They stop the fuel to Gaza,
observe how this works and backtrack when the international reaction
is too negative. They stop the delivery of medicines, see how it
works, etc. The scientific aim justifies the means.

The man in charge of the experiment is Defense Minister Ehud Barak, a
man of many ideas and few scruples, a man whose whole turn of mind is
basically inhuman. He is now, perhaps, the most dangerous person in
Israel, more dangerous than Ehud Olmert and Binyamin Netanyahu,
dangerous to the very existence of Israel in the long run.

The man in charge of execution is the Chief of Staff. This week we had
the chance of hearing speeches by two of his predecessors, generals
Moshe Ya'alon and Shaul Mofaz, in a forum with inflated intellectual
pretensions. Both were discovered to have views that place them
somewhere between the extreme Right and the ultra-Right. Both have a
frighteningly primitive mind. There is no need to waste a word about
the moral and intellectual qualities of their immediate successor, Dan
Halutz. If these are the voices of the three last Chiefs of Staff,
what about the incumbent, who cannot speak out as openly as they? Has
this apple fallen further from the tree?

Until three days ago, the generals could entertain the opinion that
the experiment was succeeding. The misery in the Gaza Strip had
reached its climax. Hundreds of thousands were threatened by actual
hunger. The chief of UNRWA warned of an impending human catastrophe.
Only the rich could still drive a car, heat their homes and eat their
fill. The world stood by and wagged its collective tongue. The leaders
of the Arab states voiced empty phrases of sympathy without raising a
finger.

Barak, who has mathematical abilities, could calculate when the
population would finally collapse.

AND THEN something happened that none of them foresaw, in spite of the
fact that it was the most foreseeable event on earth.

When one puts a million and a half people in a pressure cooker and
keeps turning up the heat, it will explode. That is what happened at
the Gaza-Egypt border.

At first there was a small explosion. A crowd stormed the gate,
Egyptian policemen opened live fire, dozens were wounded. That was a
warning.

The next day came the big attack. Palestinian fighters blew up the
wall in many places. Hundreds of thousands broke out into Egyptian
territory and took a deep breath. The blockade was broken.

Even before that, Mubarak was in an impossible situation. Hundreds of
millions of Arabs, a billion Muslims, saw how the Israeli army had
closed the Gaza strip off on three sides: the North, the East and the
sea. The fourth side of the blockade was provided by the Egyptian army.

The Egyptian president, who claims the leadership of the entire Arab
world, was seen as a collaborator with an inhuman operation conducted
by a cruel enemy in order to gain the favor (and the money) of the
Americans. His internal enemies, the Muslim Brothers, exploited the
situation to debase him in the eyes of his own people.

It is doubtful if Mubarak could have persisted in this position. But
the Palestinian masses relieved him of the need to make a decision.
They decided for him. They broke out like a tsunami wave. Now he has
to decide whether to succumb to the Israeli demand to re-impose the
blockade on his Arab brothers.

And what about Barak's experiment? What's the next step? The options
are few:

1. To re-occupy Gaza. The army does not like the idea. It
understands that this would expose thousands of soldiers to a cruel
guerilla war, which would be unlike any intifada before.
2. To tighten the blockade again and exert extreme pressure on
Mubarak, including the use of Israeli influence on the US Congess to
deprive him of the billions he gets every year for his services.
3. To turn the curse into a blessing, by handing the Strip over to
Mubarak, pretending that this was Barak's hidden aim all along. Egypt
would have to safeguard Israel's security, prevent the launching of
Qassams and expose its own soldiers to a Palestinian guerilla war -
when it thought it was rid of the burden of this poor and barren area,
and after the infrastructure there has been destroyed by the Israeli
occupation. Probably Mubarak will say: Very kind of you, but no thanks.

The brutal blockade was a war crime. And worse: it was a stupid blunder.

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to