Hi.  It's hard to choose which human disaster to focus on, but the
commodification of food and our environment rate at the top.  This
essay goes to the heart of it all, but there's a compainion piece by
Frances Moore Lappe (Diet for a Small Planet, et al) in July's
'Progressive' which is as important,, but a bit long for comfortable
reading via computer.  It's title is A Shortage of Democracy, Not Food.
The magazine was begun by Bob LaFollette, founder of the Progressive
Party, in 1909, Senator (WI) and 1924 presidential candidate who got 5
million votes - 1/6th of the total cast. It remains feisty, informative and
deserving of a look and support.

Ed  (Thanks to the Encyclopedia Britannica for the info on LaFollette)

Monocultures, Monopolies, Myths ...
... and the Masculinisation of Agriculture

A new seed has been genetically engineered so that it will not germinate
at harvest. This will ensure that farmers must buy new seed each year.
The patriarchal minds behind these innovations would stunt nature so
that they themselves profit economically while biodiversity, long-term
sustainability and, indeed, small farmers' lives are destroyed.

by Dr Vandana Shiva
Tuesday, July 08, 2008


"There can be no partnership between the terminator logic which
destroys nature's renewability and regeneration and the commitment to
continuity of life held by woman farmers of the Third World".

I am writing this statement from beautiful Doon Valley in the Himalayas
where the monsoons have arrived, and our Navdanya (Nine Seeds Our
National Movement on Conservation of Biodiversity) team is busy with the
transplanting of over 300 rice varieties which we are conserving along
with the rich diversity of other agricultural crops. Our farm does not
use any chemicals or external inputs. It is a self-regenerative system
which preserves biodiversity while meeting human needs and needs of farm
animals.

Our two bullocks are the alternative to chemical fertilisers which
pollute soil and water as well as to tractors and fossil fuels which
pollute the atmosphere and destabilise the climate.

One of the rice varieties we conserve and grow is basmati, the aromatic
rice for which Dehra Dun is famous.The basmati rice which farmers in my
valley have been growing for centuries is today being claimed as "an
instant invention of a novel rice line" by a US Corporation called
RiceTec (Patent number 5663454).

The "neem" which our mothers and grandmothers have used for centuries as
a pesticide and fungicide has been patented for these uses by W R Grace,
another US Corporation.

We have challenged Grace's patent with the Greens in the European
Parliament in the European Patent Office. This phenomenon of biopiracy
through which western corporations are stealing centuries of collective
knowledge and innovation carried out by Third World women is now
reaching epidemic proportions. Such "biopiracy" is now being justified
as a new "partnership" between agribusiness and Third World women. For
us, theft cannot be the basis of partnership. Partnership implies
equality and mutual respect. This would imply that there is no room for
biopiracy and that those who have engaged in such piracy apologise to
those they have stolen from and whose intellectual and natural
creativity they want to undermine through IPR monopolies. Partnership
with Third World women necessitates changes in the WTO/TRIPs agreement
which protects the pirates and punishes the original innovators as in
the case of the US/India TRIPs dispute.

It also requires changes in the US Patent Act which allows rampant
piracy of our biodiversity related knowledge. These changes are
essential to ensure that our collective knowledge and innovation is
protected and women are recognised and respected as knowers and
biodiversity experts.

Women farmers have been the seed keepers and seed breeders over
millenia. The basmati is just one among 100,000 varieties of rice
evolved by Indian farmers. Diversity and perenniality is our culture of
the seed. In Central India, which is the Vavilov Centre of rice
diversity, at the beginning of the agricultural season, farmers gather
at the village deity, offer their rice varieties and then share the
seeds. This annual festival of "Akti" rejuvenates the duty of saving and
sharing seed among farming communities. It establishes partnership among
farmers and with the earth.  IPRs on seeds are however criminalising
this duty to the earth and to each other by making seed saving and seed
exchange illegal. The attempt to prevent farmers from saving seed is not
just being made through new IPR laws, it is also being made through the
new genetic engineering technologies. Delta and Pine Land (now owned by
Monsanto) and the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) have established a
new partnership through a jointly held patent (No 5723785) to seed which
has been genetically engineered to ensure that it does not germinate on
harvest thus forcing farmers to buy seed at each planting season.
Termination of germination is a means for capital accumulation and
market expansion. However, abundance in nature and for farmers shrinks
as markets grow for Monsanto. When we sow seed, we pray, "May this seed
be exhaustless". Monsanto and the USDA on the other hand are stating,
"Let this seed be terminated so that our profits and monopoly is
exhaustless".

There can be no partnership between the terminator logic which destroys
nature's renewability and regeneration and the commitment to continuity
of life held by women farmers of the Third World. The two worldviews do
not merely clash they are mutually exclusive. There can be no
partnership between a logic of death on which Monsanto bases its
expanding empire and the logic of life on which women farmers in the
Third World base their partnership with the earth to provide food
security to their families and communities.

There are other dimensions of the mutually exclusive interests and
perspectives of women farmers of the Third World and biotechnology
corporations such as Monsanto. The most widespread application of
genetic engineering in agriculture is herbicide resistance, that is, the
breeding of crops to be resistant to herbicides. Monsanto's Round Up
Ready Soya and Cotton are examples of this application. When introduced
to Third World farming systems, this will lead to increased use of
agri-chemicals thus increasing environmental problems. It will also
destroy the biodiversity that is the sustenance and livelihood base of
rural women. What are weeds for Monsanto are food, are fodder and
medicine for Third World Women. In Indian agriculture women use 150
different species of plants for vegetables, fodder and health care. In
West Bengal 124 "weed" species collected from rice fields have economic
importance for farmers.

In the Expana region of Veracruz, Mexico, peasants utilise about 435
wild plant and animal species of which 229 are eaten.

The spread of Round Up Ready crops would destroy this diversity and the
value it provides to farmers. It would also undermine the soil
conservation functions of cover crops and crop mixtures, thus leading to
accelerated soil erosion. Contrary to Monsanto myths, Round Up Ready
crops are a recipe for soil erosion, not a method for soil conservation.

Instead of falsely labelling the patriarchal projects of intellectual
property rights on seed and genetic engineering in agriculture which are
destroying biodiversity and the small farmers of the Third World as
"partnership" with Third World women, it would be more fruitful to
redirect agricultural policy towards women centred systems which promote
biodiversity based small farm agriculture. A common myth used by
Monsanto and the Biotechnology industry is that without genetic
engineering, the world cannot be fed. However, while biotechnology is
projected as increasing food production four times, small ecological
farms have productivity hundreds of times higher than large industrial
farms based on conventional farms.


"This Phenomenon of biopiracy through which western corporations are
stealing centuries of collective knowledge and innovation carried out by
Third World women is now reaching epidemic propotions".


Women farmers in the Third World are predominantly small farmers. They
provide the basis of food security, and they provide food security in
partnership with other species. The partnership between women and
biodiversity has kept the world fed through history, at present, and
will feed the world in the future. It is this partnership that needs to
be preserved and promoted to ensure food security. Agriculture based on
diversity, decentralisation and improving small farm productivity
through ecological methods is a women-centred, nature-friendly
agriculture. In this women-centred agriculture, knowledge is shared,
other species and plants are kin, not "property", and sustainability is
based on renewal of the earth's fertility and renewal and regeneration
of biodiversity and species richness on farms to provide internal inputs.

In our paradigms, there is no place for monocultures of genetically
engineered crops and IPR monopolies on seeds. Monocultures and
monopolies symbolise a masculinisation of agriculture. The war mentality
underlying military-industrial agriculture is evident from the names
given to herbicides which destroy the economic basis of the survival of
the poorest women in the rural areas of the Third World. Monsanto's
herbicides are called "Round Up", "Machete", "Lasso". American Home
Products which has merged with Monsanto calls its herbicides "Pentagon",
"Prowl", "Scepter", "Squadron", "Cadre", "Lightening", "Assert",
"Avenge". This is the language of war, not sustainability.
Sustainability is based on peace with the earth. The violence intrinsic
to methods and metaphors used by the global agribusiness and
biotechnology corporations is a violence against nature's biodiversity
and women's expertise and productivity. The violence intrinsic to
destruction of diversity through monocultures and the destruction of the
freedom to save and exchange seeds through IPR monopolies is
inconsistent with women's diverse non-violent ways of knowing nature and
providing food security. This diversity of knowledge systems and
production systems is the way forward for ensuring that Third World
women continue to play a central role as knowers, producers and
providers of food.

Genetic Engineering and IPRs will rob Third World women and their
creativity, innovation and decision making power in agriculture. In
place of women deciding what is grown in fields and served in kitchens,
agriculture based on globalisation, genetic engineering and corporate
monopolies on seeds will establish a food system and worldview in which
men controlling global corporations control what is grown in our fields
and what we eat. Corporate men investing financial capital in theft and
biopiracy will present themselves as creators and owners of life. We do
not want a partnership in this violent usurpation of the creativity of
creation and Third World women by global biotechnology corporations who
call themselves the "Life Sciences Industry" even while they push
millions of species and millions of small farmers to extinction.

_____

Dr Vandana Shiva is one of the world's most dynamic and provocative
thinkers on the environment, women's rights and international affairs. A
physicist, ecologist and activist, she won the alternative Nobel Prize
in 1993. Her recent publication Biopiracy, The Plunder of knowledge and
Nature (1997) is published by Green Books.

Secretariat of Diverse Women for Diversity Research Foundation for
Science, technology and Ecology A-60, Haux khas New Delhi - 110016,
India Telephone 91-11-6856795
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.indiaserver.com/betas/vshiva

http://www.aislingmagazine.com/aislingmagazine/articles/TAM24/Masculinisation.html


TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/


_______________________________________________
Rad-Green mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green


------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to