"Here, Broken Laws Be Left ... " 
The Anthrax Attacks and the Assault on Civil Liberties 
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS 

In last weekend’s edition of CounterPunch, Alexander Cockburn updates the 
ongoing persecution of Sami Al-Arian by federal prosecutors. Al-Arian was a 
Florida university professor of computer science who was ensnared by the Bush 
Regime’s need to produce “terrorists” in order to keep Americans fearful and, 
thereby, amenable to the Bush Regime’s assault on US civil liberties. 
The charges against Al-Arian were rejected by a jury, but the Bush Regime could 
not accept the obvious defeat. If Al-Arian was not a terrorist, then other of 
the Bush Regime’s fabricated cases might fall apart, too. 
 
In open view, the US Department of Justice (sic) proceeded to trash every known 
ethical rule of prosecution. I don’t need to repeat the facts, as they are 
covered by Cockburn’s articles and in The Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Instead, I want to point out another meaning of the Al-Arian case. The Justice 
(sic) Department itself knows that it is persecuting a totally innocent person 
for reasons of a political agenda--the need to convince gullible Americans of 
an ongoing terrorist threat. The existence of this threat is used to justify 
the Bush Regime’s adoption of police state measures, such as spying on 
Americans without warrants, arresting them without charges, and refusing to let 
go of them when they are cleared by juries. 
 
Sami Al-Arian is a fabricated terrorist created by federal prosecutors and 
judges in behalf of an undeclared agenda. The Al-Arian case proves that 
terrorists are in short supply and that the Bush Regime has had to create them 
out of total innocents. The “war on terror” is a hoax used to justify war 
crimes and the overthrow of America’s civil liberties.
 
The anthrax scare is one more example of the Bush Regime’s use of 
disinformation to advance an undeclared political agenda. As Glenn Greenwald 
reminded us last week in Salon, the Bush Regime used Brian Ross at ABC News to 
spread the lie far and wide that US government tests proved that the anthrax 
mailed to various Americans, including prominent US Senators, was made in Iraq 
by Saddam Hussein. This lie was essential for scaring Congress into passing the 
Bush Regime’s Gestapo laws, such as the PATRIOT Act, and for overcoming 
opposition to invading Iraq. 
 
When it leaked out that the anthrax actually came from a US government lab, the 
Bush Regime tried to frame a US scientist, Steven J. Hatfill, but failed. On 
June 28th, the Los Angeles Times reported that Hatfill, “The former Army 
scientist who was the prime suspect in the deadly 2001 anthrax mailings agreed 
Friday to take $5.82 million from the government to settle his claim that the 
Justice Department and the FBI invaded his privacy and ruined his career.” 
Indeed, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton allowed Hatfill’s attorneys 
two years to review all news reports and FBI evidence. Judge Walton stated: 
“there is not a scintilla of evidence that would indicate that Dr. Hatfill had 
anything to do with this.”
 
The anthrax matter was again news last week when another US government 
scientist, Bruce E. Ivins, “committed suicide.” Instantly, the deceased Ivins 
was fingered as the culprit. Overnight a man, liked and respected by his 
colleagues, who had worked on American biological warfare weapons for years, 
became a deranged homicidal maniac who decided to murder Americans at random in 
the immediate aftermath of 9/11 by sending them letters containing anthrax. 
 
I don’t believe a word of it. But assume that it is true. Blaming the anthrax 
letters on Ivins does not resolve the issue of why the Bush Regime lied to 
Brian Ross and used ABC to put the blame on Saddam Hussein in order to invade 
an innocent country. Wouldn’t a government that would lie about something this 
serious lie about other serious matters? 
 
The Bush Regime stands against against the truth. That is why it pretends to 
have the power to prevent executive branch officials wanted for questioning by 
Congress from appearing before the people’s representatives. Nothing could make 
clearer the contempt that the Bush Regime has for the American people and their 
elected representatives than its arrogant claim that it is unanswerable to them.
 
Obviously, neither the President nor the Vice President respect their oaths of 
office. If they will betray such a serious oath, won’t they lie about 
everything?
 
According to the discredited 9/11 Commission Report, a few Muslims hatched a 
multi-year plot that went undetected by the vast security agencies of the 
United States and its allies, and within one hour on one morning at four 
different locations defeated airport security, NORAD, the US Air Force, Vice 
President Cheney, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, the Pentagon’s defenses and 
crashed three hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center towers and the 
heart of the US military. Muslims were able to achieve this fantastic feat 
operating out of caves in Afghanistan.
 
We now know for a fact that the “terrorist anthrax attack” had nothing 
whatsoever to do with Muslim terrorists. Even the US Government now blames 
white American citizens, employees of the federal government, for the anthrax 
letters that, at the time, were blamed on the “Osama bin Laden al Qaeda plot 
against America.” 
 
We now know for a fact that this was intentional disinformation planted by the 
Bush Regime on a gullible and incompetent ABC News reporter, who is a disgrace 
to journalism. No one denies this. 
 
We also know for a fact that ABC News will not say who planted on ABC the lies 
that committed the United States to the dishonor of an illegal invasion, war 
crimes, and executive branch attack on the US Constitution. How can anyone 
anywhere in the world rely on ABC News when it serves as a disinformation 
agency for a criminal regime? 
 
The anthrax letters made the “terrorist attack” seem wider and more general. 
This increased the sense of peril and Americans’ fear and anger, thereby 
opening wider the door for the Bush Regime’s attack on Iraq and US civil 
liberty.
 
Now that the dead Ivins can be conveniently blamed for the anthrax mailings, 
the Bush Regime can declare the case closed, thus protecting the false flag 
operation from further risk of exposure.
 
Many Americans lack the mental and emotional strength to confront the facts. 
The facts are too unsettling and many are relieved when the “mainstream media” 
spins the facts away. Many Americans find it too appalling that any part of 
“their” government, even a rogue operation, could possibly have been involved 
in any way in the anthrax attacks. No evidence--not even full 
confessions--could convince them otherwise. Many Americans have welcomed their 
brainwashing by the neoconservatives: America is pure; her shining virtue 
causes evil men to attack her; they hate us because we are good and they are 
evil. 
 
For the sake of argument, let’s accept this make-believe. It does not explain 
why, in order to protect us from evil men, the US Constitution needs to be 
dismantled and civil liberties set aside. Our Founding Fathers said that 
dismantling the Constitution and setting aside civil liberties are precisely 
what would make us unsafe in the extreme. The Bush Regime has never explained 
how the civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution interfere with any 
legitimate response to terrorism. 
 
The fact still remains that the Bush Regime responded to 9/11 and anthrax 
letters with a comprehensive assault on US civil liberty. The Bush Regime’s 
assault on America has been much more successful than its assault on 
“terrorism.” Who remembers the promise of a “six weeks war”? Americans have 
been mired for 6 years in two wars without end which the neoconned Bush Regime, 
in alliance with Israeli zionists, seeks to expand to Iran, Pakistan, Syria, 
and Lebanon. The Republican candidate for president has given his commitment to 
a 100-year “war against terrorism.” Many Americans will vote for this candidate 
who wants to fight against a hoax for 100 years.
 
In The Twilight of Democracy: The Bush Plan for America, Jennifer Van Bergen 
explains the constitutional and legal principles on which American liberty is 
based and the Bush Regime’s intense assault on these principles. Part I of her 
book sets out the Constitutional principles that are under attack. Part II 
details the systematic attack on the US Constitution that is the heart and soul 
of the Republican neoconservative Bush Regime--and a Regime it is as it asserts 
that it is above the law and unanswerable to law, Congress, the federal courts, 
and the Constitution that it is sworn to uphold
Jennifer Van Bergan likens Bush and his brownshirt supporters to Julius Caesar 
in motives, though not in courage. She cites the poet Lucan who in his work 
Pharsalia described Caesar as he flouted the law of the Roman Republic and 
crossed the Rubicon with his army: “When Caesar crossed and trod beneath his 
feet the soil of Italy’s forbidden fields, ‘here,’ spake he, ‘peace, here 
broken laws be left; Farewell to treaties. Fortune, lead me on; War is our 
judge.’” 
 
Anyone who believes that the Bush Regime’s “war on terror” is about terrorism, 
oil, getting even with those who attacked us, bringing freedom and democracy to 
Muslims--whatever rationale makes the gratuitous war crimes committed by the 
Bush Regime acceptable to gullible Americans--needs to read Jennifer Van 
Bergan’s Twilight of Democracy. Nothing less than American liberty is at stake.
 
The hour is late. Gullible Americans are being marched off into tyranny as the 
promised land of safety.
 
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan 
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial 
page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny 
of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.counterpunch.org/


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to