"Hearts and Minds" http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/942.html
One of the Very Best Anti-War Films I Have Ever Seen! - Frank Dorrel If you've never seen this film, you may be surprised at how little has changed since the American people were sold on the fraudulent & immoral war in Vietnam. Hearts and Minds is a 1974 documentary film <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_film> about the Vietnam War <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War> directed by Peter Davis <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Davis_(director)> . The film's title is based on a quote from President Lyndon B. Johnson <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson> : "the ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live out there". The movie was chosen as Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Documentary_Feature> at the 47th Academy Awards <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/47th_Academy_Awards> presented in 1975. The film premiered at the 1974 Cannes Film Festival <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannes_Film_Festival> . Commercial distribution was delayed in the United States due to legal issues, including a temporary restraining order <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restraining_order> obtained by one of the interviewees, former National Security Advisor <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Advisor_(United_States)> Walt Rostow <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Rostow> who had claimed through his attorney that the film was "somewhat misleading" and "not representative" and that he had not been given the opportunity to approve the results of his interview. After Columbia Pictures <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Pictures> refused to distribute the picture, Bert Schneider <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bert_Schneider> and Henry Jaglom <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Jaglom> purchased back the rights and released the film in March 1975 through Warner Bros. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Bros.> A planned December 18, 1974 opening in Los Angeles, California <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles,_California> was canceled after the production company had been unable to pay the $1 million needed to buy the rights from Columbia Pictures. The film was ultimately played in Los Angeles for the one week it needed to be eligible for consideration in the 1974 Academy Awards. Featured Individuals A scene described as one of the film's "most shocking and controversial sequences" shows the funeral of an ARVN <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_the_Republic_of_Vietnam> soldier and his grieving family, as a sobbing woman is restrained from climbing into the grave after the coffin. The funeral scene is juxtaposed with an interview with General William Westmoreland <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Westmoreland> — commander of American military operations in the Vietnam War at its peak from 1964 to 1968 and United States Army Chief of Staff <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_of_Staff_of_the_United_States_Army> from 1968 to 1972 — telling a stunned Davis that "The Oriental doesn't put the same high price on life as does a Westerner. Life is plentiful. Life is cheap in the Orient." After an initial take, Westmoreland indicated that he had expressed himself inaccurately. After a second take ran out of film, the section was reshot for a third time, and it was the third take that was included in the film. Davis later reflected on this interview stating, "As horrified as I was when General Westmoreland said, 'The Oriental doesn’t put the same value on life,' instead of arguing with him, I just wanted to draw him out... I wanted the subjects to be the focus, not me as filmmaker." The film also includes clips of George Thomas Coker <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Thomas_Coker> , a United States Navy <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Navy> aviator held by the North Vietnamese as a prisoner of war <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner_of_war> for 6½ years, including more than two years spent in solitary confinement. One of the film's earliest scenes details a homecoming parade in Coker's honor in his hometown of Linden, New Jersey <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linden,_New_Jersey> , where he tells the assembled crowd on the steps of city hall that if the need arose, that they must be ready to send him back to war. Answering a student's question about Vietnam at a school assembly, Coker responds that "If it wasn't for the people, it was very pretty. The people there are very backwards and primitive and they make mess out of everything. In a 2004 article on the film, Desson Thomson <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desson_Thomson> of The Washington Post <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post> comments on the inclusion of Coker in the film, noting that "When he does use people from the pro-war side, Davis chooses carefully." Time <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_(magazine)> magazine's Stefan Kanfer <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stefan_Kanfer&action=edit&redlink=1> noted the lack of balance in Coker's portrayal, "An ex-P.O.W.'s return to New Jersey is played against a background of red-white-and-blue-blooded patriots and wide-eyed schoolchildren. The camera, which amply records the agonies of South Vietnamese political prisoners, seems uninterested in the American lieutenant's experience of humiliation and torture." The film also features Vietnam war veteran and anti-war activist Bobby Muller <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bobby_Muller> , who later founded the Vietnam Veterans of America <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_Veterans_of_America> . Daniel Ellsberg <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Ellsberg> , who had released the Pentagon Papers <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers> in 1971, discusses his initial gung-ho attitude toward the war in Vietnam The concluding interview features US Vietnam veteran Randy Floyd, stating "We've all tried very hard to escape what we have learned in Vietnam. I think Americans have worked extremely hard not to see the criminality that their officials and their policy makers exhibited. The film includes images of Phan Thị Kim Phúc <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phan_Th%E1%BB%8B_Kim_Ph%C3%BAc> in sections of a film shot of the aftermath of a napalm attack which shows Phúc at about age nine running naked on the street after being severely burned on her back Critical Reception Hearts and Minds has attracted extensive critical attention, almost all of it either glowingly positive or damningly negative, but rarely anything in between, with reviewers tending to treat it either as a masterpiece in political documentary film making or as a hatchet job anti-Vietnam War propaganda film, one that has received "passionately opposing views". Vietnam War films from the 1960s to the 1970s reflected deep divisions at home over the war. Some reflected pro-war sentiments and vilified anti-war protesters, while others stood at the opposite end and criticized government officials and policies. "Hearts and Minds" was one of the first of the latter to have been produced and released before the war's end in 1975. Vincent Canby <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Canby> of The New York Times <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times> called it an "epic documentary ... that recalls this nation's agonizing involvement in Vietnam, something you may think you know all about, including the ending. But you don't." Canby included the film among his ten best of 1975, calling it a "fine, complex, admittedly biased meditation upon American power" and a movie "that will reveal itself as one of the most all-emcompassing records of the American civilization ever put into one film." Desson Thomson <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desson_Thomson> of The Washington Post <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Post> described it as "one of the best documentaries ever made, a superb film about the thoughts and feelings of the era, the whole festering, spirited animus of it." Rex Reed <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_Reed> called it that year's "best film at the Cannes Film Festival" and stated that "this is the only film I have ever seen that sweeps away the gauze surrounding Vietnam and tells the truth." Other reviewers have criticized the movie for its biased presentation. Roger Ebert <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ebert> for the Chicago Sun Times <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Sun_Times> wrote: "Here is a documentary about Vietnam that doesn't really level with us ... If we know something about how footage is obtained and how editing can make points, it sometimes looks like propaganda ... And yet, in scene after scene, the raw material itself is so devastating that it brushes the tricks aside." Walter Goodman of The New York Times in an article titled False Art of the Propaganda Film, pointed out Davis' technique of showing only one side of the interview, pointing out that Walt Rostow <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Rostow> 's response may have been in response to "some provocation, a gesture, a facial expression, a turn of phrase" from his interrogator. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearts_and_Minds_(film)> To this criticism, actress Shirley MacLaine <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_MacLaine> responded, "[Mr. Goodman] displays the very deception and distortion that is usually associated with the pejorative meaning of propaganda. For example, Mr. Goodman starts out by claiming that in most countries, propaganda is a monopoly of the state, but that in the United States the most notable examples of propaganda 'come from the state's adversaries.' This is ridiculous. In America, the state spends millions of dollars every year on propaganda." David Dugas of United Press International <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Press_International> , in a 1975 review printed in Pacific Stars and Stripes <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stars_and_Stripes_(newspaper)> , saw that "Davis' approach clearly is one-sided and is not likely to impress Vietnam hawks. But his film is brilliantly assembled, biting and informative." Colin Jacobson wrote in his review of the movie for the DVD Movie Guide: "Probably the biggest criticism one can level at Hearts and Minds stems from its editorial bent. Without question, it takes the anti-war side of things, and one could argue it goes for a pro-Vietnamese bent as well....In the end, Hearts and Minds remains a flawed film that simply seems too one-sided for its own good." In his review, David Ng of the online Images: A Journal of Film and Popular Culture wrote: "The documentary is clearly anti-war in both tone and content." M. Joseph Sobran, Jr. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._Joseph_Sobran,_Jr.> of the conservative magazine National Review <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review> , wrote: "... blatant piece of propaganda ... disingenuously one-sided ..." and goes on to show the cinematic techniques used by the producers to achieve this effect. Stefan Kanfer of Time <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_(magazine)> magazine notes that "Throughout, Hearts and Minds displays more than enough heart. It is mind that is missing. Perhaps the deepest flaw lies in the method: the Viet Nam War is too convoluted, too devious to be examined in a style of compilation without comment." Michael Moore <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Moore> has cited Hearts and Minds as the one movie that inspired him to become a film maker, calling it "not only the best documentary I have ever seen, it may be the best movie ever". Many of the cinematic techniques used in Hearts and Minds are similar to Moore's 2004 documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_9/11> . A classic, hard-to-find film Hearts and Minds http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/942.html - Brasscheck P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and videos with friends and colleagues. That's how we grow. Thanks. ================================ Brasscheck TV 2380 California St. San Francisco, CA 94115 brasschec...@aweber.com www.brasschecktv.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/la...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
