CALIFORNIA'S PERFECT STORM
By David Bacon
Rethinking Schools, Fall 2010
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/25_01/25_01_bacon.shtml


The United States today faces an economic crisis 
worse than any since the Great Depression of the 
1930s. Nowhere is it sharper than in the nation's 
schools. It's no wonder that last year saw 
strikes, student walkouts, and uprisings in 
states across the country, aimed at priorities 
that put banks and stockbrokers ahead of 
children. California was no exception. In fact, 
other states looked on in horror simply at the 
size of its budget deficit-at one point more than 
$34 billion. The quality of the public schools 
plummeted as class sizes ballooned and resources 
disappeared in blizzards of pink slips. Fee 
increases drove tens of thousands from community 
colleges and university campuses.

But California wasn't just a victim. Last year it 
saw a perfect storm of protest in virtually every 
part of its education system. K-12 teachers built 
coalitions with parents and students to fight for 
their jobs and their schools. Students poured out 
of community colleges and traveled to huge 
demonstrations at the capitol. Building 
occupations and strikes rocked the University of 
California (UC) and the California State 
University (CSU) campuses. Together, they 
challenged the way the cost of the state's 
economic crisis is being shifted onto education, 
with a particularly bitter impact on communities 
of color. Activists questioned everything from 
the structural barriers to raising new taxes to 
the skewed budget priorities favoring prisons 
over schools.

Rise and Fall of the Master Plan

When the current recession hit, California had 
already fallen from one of the country's leaders 
in per-pupil education funding in the 1950s to 
49th among the 50 states in the last decade. That 
fall was more than just a decline in dollars. It 
was the end of a commitment to its young people 
that started in 1960, when a wave of populist 
enthusiasm put liberals in control of the 
California Legislature and governor's mansion. 
Together, they issued a Master Plan for Higher 
Education that promised every student access to 
some degree of postsecondary schooling. Community 
colleges were free, omnipresent, and accepted 
everyone. UCs had no tuition and charged only 
nominal "fees" for university services. Strikes 
led by Third World students and civil rights 
demonstrations opened the doors wider to people 
of color and youth of working-class families 
generally. The state's reputation as an economic 
and technological powerhouse owed much to the 
students who passed through the system in the 
decades that followed.

By last year, that era wasn't even a memory for 
students who have grown up in an age of shrinking 
expectations. Yet on paper, at least, the promise 
remained. In urging students and teachers on UC 
campuses to fight instead of giving up, noted 
radical sociologist Mike Davis called it an epic 
challenge. "Equity and justice are endangered at 
every level of the Master Plan for Education," he 
argued. Davis called on his fellow faculty 
members to look out of their office windows. 
"Obscene wealth still sprawls across the coastal 
hills, but flatland inner cities and blue-collar 
interior valleys face the death of the California 
dream. Their children-let's not beat around the 
bush-are being pushed out of higher education. 
Their future is being cut off at its knees."

Strike! he urged them. "A strike," he said, "by 
matching actions to words, is the highest form of 
teach-in. The 24th [the date last September for 
the first walkout] is the beginning of learning 
how to shout in unison."

Strike!

Davis' letter came just as the perfect storm 
began to build. Lightning struck first at the 
universities, scenes of the sharpest 
confrontations in California last year. 
California's university system includes 10 UC and 
23 CSU campuses. Organizing started even before 
students were back in their fall classes. "I was 
involved in previous campaigns against budget 
cuts when they were more modest," recalls Ricardo 
Gomez, a UC Berkeley student leader. "We knew the 
state's $34 billion budget shortfall would be 
used to slash money for education, and that the 
regents would put a big fee increase on the 
table. This time around we resolved to do 
something different, to move out of the channels 
of student government."

Students and university workers created a joint 
strike committee that from the beginning sought 
to build an alliance with faculty on every 
campus. "The structure on each campus was open to 
everyone," Gomez says. "From the first day of 
classes, people who'd never been involved before 
were turned on. . . . We wanted a mass 
organization to plan demonstrations. At the same 
time we formed committees to set up websites, 
make posters and flyers, and put together the 
marches." In late August, the strike committee 
set a date for the first demonstrations-the 
walkout planned for Sept. 24.

One reason for what became an unprecedented level 
of faculty involvement was the move away from 
tenured positions to the widespread employment of 
contingent instructors, with much lower pay and 
little security. UC has about 19,400 faculty 
members, but only about 9,000 today have tenure. 
Highlighting the impact at UC Santa Cruz was the 
dismissal of Susanne Jonas and Guillermo Delgado, 
instructors in Latin American and Latino Studies 
with more than two decades of seniority each, and 
the end of the celebrated Community Studies 
program. Lecturers were the first faculty victims 
of the cuts on every campus.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and UC administrators 
ensured the involvement of another constituency 
with their war on campus unions. Blue-collar UC 
members of the American Federation of State, 
County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) had just 
won a good contract after years of fighting. They 
saw their gains evaporate in furloughs and 
layoffs. The University Professional and 
Technical Employees (UPTE) still didn't have a 
contract, and voted to strike Sept. 24.

Stoking the anger further, a series of media 
exposés documented high salary increases for top 
UC executives. At the Sept. 15-17 regents 
meeting, some received increases of up to 30 
percent (up to $52,000 per year) on salaries in 
the $200,000 to $400,000 range.

UC Santa Cruz Feminist Studies professor Bettina 
Aptheker called the Sept. 24 strike "the largest 
unified action, perhaps, in the history of the 
UCs. It is first and foremost in defense of 
public education, and then in support of shared 
governance, in which faculty and students, but 
especially faculty, are allowed to actually 
influence policy and decisions. Third, it is in 
support of all union demands for negotiations and 
contracts."

Nevertheless, UC President Mark Yudof proposed a 
32 percent fee increase spread over the following 
two years. That proposal virtually guaranteed 
that the November regents meeting, scheduled to 
vote on it, would be greeted by further walkouts. 
As the regents met, students occupied buildings 
in Los Angeles, Berkeley, Santa Cruz, and Davis. 
Demonstrations shook the other five campuses.

Yudof dismissed the protests in a snide 
commentary in the New York Times. Schwarzenegger 
did too. "They're all screaming," he said. 
"Everyone has to tighten their belts." But on the 
campuses, the chancellors were forced to react. 
First they punished the students who occupied 
buildings. A second building occupation in 
Berkeley in December led to the arrests of 65 
students. By then, occupations had spread into 
the state university system as well, over similar 
tuition increases and budget cuts. In both 
Berkeley and San Francisco, police stormed the 
occupied buildings rather than negotiate the exit 
of students, as they'd done previously.

Yet some cutbacks were reversed. Library hours 
that had been cut in Berkeley and Santa Cruz, for 
instance, were restored. In Los Angeles, protests 
won the chancellor's support for more aid to 
undocumented students. And under the pressure of 
strikes and protests, UPTE finally won a contract.

Crisis Hides Restructuring Plans

Schwarzenegger and the regents were using the 
state's budget crisis to move forward a much 
broader agenda-a shift in the way education in 
California is funded, what the money is used for, 
and who can afford higher education.

"The 32 percent fee increase not only undermines 
the access of students to the system, especially 
students of color from working families, but it's 
also part of the privatization program," explains 
Liz Hall, director of the UC Student Association 
and a UC Berkeley alumna. "Unlike the money from 
the state, which is restricted in the way the 
university can use it, the money from fees can be 
used any way the administration wants." She 
points out that a proposal to build a UC 
supercomputer by Yudof's predecessor, Robert 
Dynes, failed because the Legislature wouldn't 
fund it. "With fee money, UC administrators can 
launch whatever research and pet projects they 
like, and grant high salaries to their cronies. 
The growth of those unrestricted funds is one 
reason we have an executive pay scandal every few 
years. The regents run UC like a for-profit 
corporation." (In California higher ed, "fees" 
actually means tuition. The 1960 Master Plan 
outlawed tuition for higher education. A critical 
aspect of the disintegration of the plan has been 
raising "student fees," originally meant to cover 
minor expenses, to amounts that can only be seen 
as billing for tuition.)

Shifting the funding of California's higher 
education system from the state, through taxes, 
onto students themselves, isn't just a program 
for the UC system. The state's community college 
system is many times larger and the impact even 
more severe.

For the first time, student fee increases are now 
used to directly fund community colleges, which 
are experiencing the same trend toward tuition 
increases. Cesar Cota, a student at Los Angeles 
City College, was the first in his family to 
attend college. "Now it's hard to achieve my 
dream," he says, "because the state put higher 
fees on us, and cut services and classes." Monica 
Mejia, a single mom, wants to get out of the 
low-wage trap. "Without community college," she 
says, "I'll end up getting paid minimum wage. I 
can't afford the fee hikes. I can barely make 
ends meet now."

According to Marty Hittelman, president of the 
California Federation of Teachers (CFT) and a 
former community college instructor, the system 
turned away more than 250,000 students in 2009-10 
alone. "Where can they go?" he asks. "UC? CSU? 
The workforce? California has a 12.6 percent 
unemployment rate, one of the nation's highest. 
The state universities dropped 40,000 students 
this year. UC fees have gone up 215 percent since 
2000, and CSU fees 280 percent. Community college 
fees, once nonexistent, rose 30 percent just last 
year.

"Hundreds of thousands of students enrolled in 
California community colleges are unable to get 
the classes they needand thousands of temporary 
faculty are without classes to teach. So, as in 
the universities, the student returns for paying 
higher fees are increased class size and fewer 
available classes."

Those cuts have an extra impact on students of 
color. The Los Angeles Community College District 
educates almost three times as many Latino 
students and nearly four times as many African 
American students as all of the UC campuses 
combined.

Rallies, Protests, and Sit-Ins

In protest, students, teachers, parents, union 
members, and community activists staged rallies 
at the end of November throughout California (as 
well as in other parts of the United States). 
There were large rallies in Los Angeles, San 
Francisco, and Oakland.

At CSU Fullerton, students took control of the 
humanities building, saying they were "putting 
ourselves in direct solidarity with the 
'occupations' that have been occurring the world 
over from universities to factories to foreclosed 
homes; from Asia to Europe to Africa to Central 
and South America and, now, here in the United 
States."

The Fullerton students chose the humanities 
building to protest the corporatization scheme 
envisioned by the campus strategic planner, 
Michael Parker, who called humanities "socially 
irrelevant" and favored courses useful for 
preparing student for corporate employment. 
Humanities, the students said, has become 
"politically dangerous to the established 
economic order. . . . We are not surprised 
because we are dangerous."

"The L.A. rally was spectacular," enthuses Jim 
Miller, who teaches at San Diego City College. 
"The church holds a thousand, and there were 
hundreds more trying to get in." He counted 565 
people who came from San Diego to the Los Angeles 
event, including three buses of students from San 
Diego City College.

The protests continued into the spring. More than 
8,000 students from Los Angeles and other 
community college districts rallied at the state 
capitol in Sacramento on March 22. State 
university campuses also sent hundreds of 
marchers.

'We Can't Fit on the Rug Anymore'

The most dramatic demonstrations were at the 
university level, but the crux of California's 
education crisis lies in the K-12 public school 
system, especially in poor urban communities, and 
neighborhoods of immigrants and people of color. 
Some 22,000 pink slips were given out to public 
school teachers across the state in the 2009-10 
academic year. "In Watsonville they're 
overcrowding classes," charges Manny Ballesteros, 
a youth organizer. "They're building more prisons 
in California than schools, and there are more 
blacks and Mexicans inside those prisons. For 
young people like me, instead of being able to 
get a job, and achieving our goals, that tells 
you, 'You're not going to make it.'"

Watsonville now only has seven school nurses for 
19,000 students, and has cut school psychologists 
and counselors, music, and art. "Sports have 
become pay to play," says Jenn Laskin, a 
humanities and English teacher at Watsonville's 
Renaissance Continuation High School. "That means 
students who are talented and don't have the 
money lose the opportunity. That cuts off yet 
another pathway to college." The state's limit of 
20 students for K-3 classes was modified in the 
Legislature's recent budget deals, so next year 
K-2 classes will have 28 students. "We're loading 
to the max. Kindergarten classes are super 
crowded, and one student told me, 'We can't even 
fit on the rug anymore.'

"Combined with the emphasis on test scores, it 
all affects children's ability to learn," she 
laments. "We have 2nd-grade students who don't 
even know how to use scissors, because they've 
been taught to the test. They can bubble in 
letters and numbers, but they can't cut a circle 
in a piece of paper."

In Los Angeles, one of the world's largest school 
districts, more than 6,300 teachers were 
originally set to lose their jobs before the 
beginning of the fall 2010 term. After 
unsuccessful attempts to get the Los Angeles 
Unified School District administration to reduce 
the number, teachers mounted a wave of 
successively more militant demonstrations. Los 
Angeles Superior Court Judge James Chalfant ruled 
that a planned one-day strike was illegal because 
it would "endanger student health and safety," 
and threatened educators with $1,000 fines and 
the loss of their teaching credential if they 
struck. So hundreds of teachers picketed their 
own schools before classes started, and parents 
and students walked with them.

One mother, Maria Gutierrez, said the one-day 
strike was a good idea. "What does it matter if 
children lose one day of class? If we lose our 
teachers, they're going to lose a lot more." And 
while the district claimed poverty was forcing 
layoffs, it found the money to hire more than 
3,000 substitute teachers to take classes in case 
the teachers stuck.

At the beginning of May, thousands of teachers 
filled the street in front of the district's 
offices, and 40 were arrested for blocking it in 
an act of civil disobedience.

Like so many other schools districts across the 
country, Los Angeles has used the crisis to 
escalate its plans to turn public schools over to 
charter groups. By the end of May, a total of 20 
existing schools and 27 new campuses had been put 
up for bid. So teachers and communities organized 
around that, too. After months of planning and 
packed meetings, many of those bids went to 
groups led by teachers.

Education or Incarceration?

With headlines focused on Los Angeles and the Bay 
Area, it's easy to forget that California is an 
agricultural state. But it may be in poor 
agricultural communities, especially those in the 
San Joaquin Valley, where the state's twisted 
priorities are the clearest. In the middle of a 
budget crisis, what will the state fund-schools 
or prisons?

Unemployment in California's rural counties is 
often twice as high as on the coast. The economic 
crisis in small valley towns like Delano and 
McFarland was a fact of life long before 
California's current budget woes. In Delano, 
historic home of Cesar Chavez's United Farm 
Workers, 30 percent of the residents live below 
the poverty line. Desperate for employment, many 
were sold the idea that prisons would provide a 
source of jobs beyond low-wage farm labor. As a 
result, the area has become home to giant 
institutions whose budgets dwarf those of local 
school districts. Valley teenagers today see 
those prisons in their future, whether as guards 
or inmates, rather than college.

Every day in Delano 3,176 people go to work in 
the Kern Valley State Prison and North Kern State 
Prison. Almost as many of the town's families now 
depend on prison jobs as those supported by 
year-round field labor. Thousands of former 
farmworkers now guard other Latinos and 
blacks-inmates just as poor, but mostly from the 
urban centers of Los Angeles or San Jose rather 
than the rural communities of the Central Valley. 
The two prisons have a combined annual budget of 
$294 million. By comparison, the town's 2010 
general fund was a tenth of that, and the budget 
of its public schools a twentieth.

Following the March 4 Day to Save Education, a 
group of teachers and home care workers began a 
march from Bakersfield to Sacramento to mobilize 
opposition to the cuts. One marcher, retired 
teacher Gavin Riley, describes the social cost as 
he saw it walking through the valley: "We've seen 
boarded-up homes everywhere. Coming into Fresno 
we walked through a skid row area where people 
were living in cardboard and wood shacks 
underneath a freeway, sleeping on the sidewalks. 
We've seen farms where the land is fallow and the 
trees have been allowed to die.

"About the only thing we've seen great growth in 
is prisons. . . . I look at that and say, what a 
waste, not only of land but also of people. I 
can't help but think that California, a state 
that's now down near the bottom in what it spends 
on education, is far and away the biggest spender 
on prisons. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to 
connect the dots."

Long-Term Strategies

The Central Valley march arrived in Sacramento on 
April 21, when more than 7,000 CFT and AFSCME 
members marched down to the capitol building to 
confront the Legislature and Schwarzenegger in a 
huge rally. They focused on one of the main 
demands that emerged in the sit-ins and 
demonstrations throughout the school year-a 
change in the way the state budget is adopted.

The state has a requirement that two-thirds of 
the Legislature approve any budget. Even more 
important, any tax increase takes a two-thirds 
vote as well. So even though Democrats have had a 
majority for years in both chambers, a solid 
Republican block can keep the state in a total 
economic crisis every year until Democrats agree 
to slash spending. Teachers' unions, students, 
other labor organizations, and community groups 
got an initiative (Proposition 25) onto the 
November ballot that would remove the two-thirds 
requirement, so that budgets and tax increases 
can be adopted by simple majority.

The state also needs new sources of revenue. 
Assemblyman Alberto Torrico authored a bill to 
charge oil companies a royalty for the petroleum 
they pull from under California's soil. 
California is the only oil-producing state that 
doesn't charge the oil giants for what they take.

As the school year drew to a close, students and 
teachers won some partial victories. Assembly 
Speaker John Perez introduced the California Jobs 
Budget, an alternative budget proposal that would 
reinstate much of the education money cut over 
the last year. He also promised to roll back the 
UC and CSU student fee increases by 50 percent. 
Meanwhile, Gov. Schwarzenegger's revised budget 
reinstated Cal Grants program funding, although 
it cut money for the poorest recipients of state 
aid at the same time. (By press time in 
September, the state legislature had still not 
passed a budget for the current fiscal year.)

"I don't feel good that we saved Cal Grants at 
the expense of single mothers and children," says 
Claudia Magaña, a student leader at UC Santa 
Cruz. "It's great to know that students had some 
power this year, but not that we won at the 
expense of the neediest people. We have to look 
at who has power in this system and how to get 
it."

Coming out of the year's actions, Magaña voices 
the conclusion of many student leaders and 
teachers-that education activists need a strategy 
for the long haul. "We need [a strategy] to win 
long-term reinvestment in the system," says Liz 
Hall. "We need a power analysis that will help us 
to build our movement. Preserving the public 
nature of education will take large-scale 
changes. This was a year of crisis for us, 
spurred by fee increases and furloughs. Now our 
bigger problem is how to get mobilization and 
commitment for much larger goals. To begin with, 
we have to get our students to turn out in 
November."

But giving more power to Democrats, and a better 
system for arriving at a budget deal, won't 
automatically reverse the state's priorities. 
Democrats vote for prisons, too.

Jim Miller says the demonstrations, and 
especially the Central Valley march, show that 
"we can fight for an economy and a government 
that work for everybody. We're not saying save 
education by throwing old people out of their 
home care, by getting rid of health care for poor 
kids, by closing down state parks, or privatizing 
prisons. This is about the future of the state of 
California."

Without unity, he says, "we'll see a scarcity 
model, where people say take someone else's piece 
of the pie, not mine. That's a race to the 
bottom."

Perhaps fighting itself was the year's biggest 
achievement. Across California, new alliances of 
teachers, students, state workers, communities of 
color, and working-class communities in general 
took on the challenge. Their strategic ideas 
ranged from student strikes and walkouts to 
alliances between communities and unions, a 
sophisticated agenda of legislative solutions, 
and mass mobilizations in rallies and marches. 
Although there was a broad variety of activity, a 
common thread highlighted the special impact 
education cuts have on communities of color and 
working-class families. A social movement is 
growing across the country to defend public 
education. California's perfect storm was at its 
leading edge, and contributed a new repertoire of 
strategy and tactics for building it.


San Diego Students Protest Racist Attacks

At UC San Diego, the storm took on a particular 
character due to a series of racist events on 
campus. The string of incidents began in 
February, Black History Month, when white 
fraternity students organized a "ghetto-themed" 
party called a "Compton Cookout." It was followed 
by a campus television show that mocked Black 
History Month. A few days later, a student hung a 
noose in the UCSD school library. Anti-hate 
rallies were organized at other campuses in 
response, and students sat in at Yudof's 
Sacramento office.

As students geared up for March 4, a KKK-style 
hood was found with a hand-drawn circle and cross 
on the statue of Dr. Seuss outside the UCSD 
library. At a rally organized at UCLA in protest, 
student Corey Matthews asked: "What kind of 
campus promotes an environment that allows people 
to think it's acceptable to target people for 
their ethnicity, gender, or sexuality? It's 
something about the tone of the environment that 
allows this."

A month later, UCSD administrators took action 
against Ricardo Dominguez, an art professor who 
developed a project to help migrants crossing the 
desert between Mexico and the United States use 
their cell phones to orient themselves, and find 
help in an emergency. Hundreds of migrants die in 
the U.S. desert each year because they cannot 
locate water or find shelter from the heat.

Conservative Republican Congressman Brian Bilbray 
objected to university administrators, who placed 
Dominguez's tenure under review.

According to Graceland West, a San Diego student 
leader: "We need more resources for immigrants 
and people of color on this campus. Instead, a 
professor with a long history of support for us 
is being punished for taking a pro-immigrant 
position. When we have cuts to enrollment and 
student services, and a lack of financial aid, 
students of color are the hardest hit. Many now 
see UCSD as a racist campus. At the same time, 
higher fees hit high school students thinking 
about coming here. All this basically deters 
students of color from applying."

-D.B.


For more articles and images, see  http://dbacon.igc.org

See also Illegal People -- How Globalization 
Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants 
(Beacon Press, 2008)
Recipient: C.L.R. James Award, best book of 2007-2008
http://www.beacon.org/productdetails.cfm?PC=2002

See also the photodocumentary on indigenous migration to the US
Communities Without Borders (Cornell University/ILR Press, 2006)
http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_detail.taf?ti_id=4575

See also The Children of NAFTA, Labor Wars on the 
U.S./Mexico Border (University of California, 
2004)
http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/9989.html
-- 
__________________________________

David Bacon, Photographs and Stories
http://dbacon.igc.org

__________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to