MORE ON THE DEBATE TAKING PLACE...

Cort

*- Havana Times.org - http://www.havanatimes.org -*

*Cuba’s Costly Social Adjustment & Intellectual Irresponsibility*

Posted By *the editor* On November 22, 2010 @ 2:46 pm In *Opinion,leftcol1*|
*4 Comments <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518&print=1#comments_controls>*

*Haroldo Dilla Alfonso *

Storm clouds. Photo by Isbel Díaz

HAVANA TIMES, Nov. 22 — Like any other political system, Cuba’s always had a
band of ideological sycophants at its disposition.  Unlike others, however,
the Cuban system has always demanded absolute alignment from its
brownnosers, even up to the most formal details, which has made them
particularly boring.

Accordingly, we have seen a parade of teachers packaged in the Soviet style
in the 70s, enthusiastic supporters of national socialism in the 80s, and
more recently they have been the partisans of the Bolivarian union.
Brezhnev, Che Guevara and Chavez have been indistinctly part of the
iconography of the ideological activists of a political regime that many
decades ago ceased being revolutionary and was never socialist.

Now the task is more complex because it involves ideologically legitimizing
the abrupt disassembly of a paternalistic/client system at a very high
social cost.  But even in these conditions they do not lack ideological
sycophants willing to digress with the line of the party and joyfully
applaud this new march of the “Revolution.”

They do not have the smallest scruple to prevent them from proclaiming that
the social slaughterhouse constituted by the firing of a more than a million
workers and the elimination of basic subsidies is a forward step in the
“perfection of socialism.”  They say the people will accept this because
they understand the need for change and they believe that no one will be
abandoned, although to date no one knows how this is to be achieved.

In summary, they sing of impossible love and sentimental nostalgia.  They
are, in short, the *boleristas* [Spanish bolero singers] of restructuring.

Just a few days ago I found an article with a different tone —optimistic and
cheerful— that invites us to enjoy the restructuring.  It’s another focus.
It’s a *guaracha* [a home-grown Cuban torchlight song] of restructuring.

Its author is a cinema critic whose qualities I can’t discuss (because truly
I’m unaware of them).  He has given us an anthological piece titled “The
Tragedy of Lay Offs and the Tenderness of
Underemployment<http://kimbomboqueresbala.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/la-tragedia-del-despido-y-la-ternura-del-subempleo/>
[1].”  According to the writer, Rufo Caballero, what he wrote has been a
dart against the pessimism of those who are dissatisfied; those who in some
place express their “tragic focus,” and in others“tear-jerki ng anecdotes.”
 He finally describes this as a sickly habit of “experiencing tragedy as a
historical need.”

Consequently, he broaches the subject like the steed of happiness as he
speaks of reconciling “instrumentality and emancipation,” of recognizing the
great contribution of small-scale ownership in “energizing social life” and
from there building a “sovereignty” that would do without verticality.
Everything is, says this *guarachero *of restructuring, about knowing how to
“improvise over a few months” while the cloudburst passes, and finally to
“invent the possibility of inventing.”

At this point, the issue deserves some personal positioning.  I believe that
reducing the government payroll, ending the myth of full (unproductive)
employment and freeing up the productive forces are all indispensable and
beneficial actions for the nation’s future.

*However, I also believe that to achieve it in the manner the Cuban
government is proposing is social cruelty:*

1-They are doing it at the worst possible time, in a severely restrained
economy, when previously they had other opportunities;

2- They are undertaking this massively, throwing hundreds of thousands of
people into the street over a very short timeframe;

3. There are no adequate policies for compensation when people have been
working in government jobs for many years;

4-It is being done without creating systems of credits and protection
(incubators) for our de-pauperized “entrepreneurs”;

5-It will take place under a political system that doesn’t allow its
citizens to be organized or to represent their interests autonomously;

6- Because all this “updating the model” is nothing other than laying the
groundwork for an appropriate setting for the accumulation of the emerging
technocratic-managerial elite led by the military.

When Rufo Caballero and other sycophants of a similar tone belt out their *
guarachas* of restructuring, they do so while omitting the immense human
suffering this will give rise to in economic and psychological terms among a
very significant portion of Cuban families who will not be able to start any
businesses.

Particularly, such families will have difficulties if they don’t have a car
to serve as a taxi, or a good house in a good location to start a restaurant
or rent out rooms, or a supportive and well-established relative in Miami
who can send them the money to be able to “invent their invention” without
dying from hunger in the attempt; or, what’s almost the same thing, a
relative working for some good government agency who can reintegrate them.

But Caballero and others omit something else.  To reconcile everything that
they say they want to reconcile and free from the “Oedipal dependence on the
government,” it is not enough to throw a million and a half people into a
social slaughterhouse.  It is necessary to establish a system of public
freedoms.  It is necessary to democratize and decentralize the state and
government.  It is necessary to establish an appropriate legal system so
that the private ownership functions, as well as other conditions that must
be established.

I’m sure that a presumably intelligent person like Rufo Caballero knows
this.  But he cannot say it, because he would be left without a job and he
himself would have to “invent the invention” to survive.  *In the end,
people like these sycophants are part of the re-composition of the elite who
require their “domesticated intellectuals,” as Che Guevara called them in
those first days when it was still possible to speak of a revolution.*
------------------------------
4 Comments (Open <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518&print=1#> |
Close<http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518&print=1#>
)

4 Comments To "Cuba’s Costly Social Adjustment & Intellectual
Irresponsibility"

*#1 Comment* By *Marce Cameron* On November 22, 2010 @ 10:40 pm

The lament of a heartsick, ex-revolutionary intellectual. Sad.

*#2 Comment* By *Marce Cameron* On November 22, 2010 @ 10:37 pm

On Dilla’s six points: (1) Yes, it should have been done earlier, but three
hurricanes in 2008 and a world economic crisis intervened; (2) They are not
being thrown out onto the street because +80% of Cuban households own their
own homes. They are losing their state jobs, but many will form cooperatives
in their workplaces, and some earn more through black market activities. (4)
The draft economic resolution for the PCC Congress proposes credit for the
private sector. (6) Really? How so? Surely the reassertion of wages, a more
decentralised enterprise management model and more tax revenue for local
government all point to an undermining of the bureaucratic elements in
Cuba’s socialist state. As for the Cuban military, it is “the people in
arms” in class content.

*#3 Comment* By *Marce Cameron* On November 22, 2010 @ 10:25 pm

Goodness me. Can this be the same Haroldo Dilla who, just a few years ago,
wrote critical commentaries as a distinguished Cuba intellectual from a
position of support for the Cuban Revolution, a revolution that he now
denies the very existence of? Dilla writes: “I believe that reducing the
government payroll, ending the myth of full (unproductive) employment and
freeing up the productive forces are all indispensable and beneficial
actions for the nation’s future.” So, Mr Dilla agrees it needs to be done,
he just disagrees with how it’s being done, and how quickly. And: “It will
take place under a political system that doesn’t allow its citizens to be
organized or to represent their interests autonomously”. Autonomously from
what? The capitalist vultures circling in Miami and Washington?

*#4 Pingback* By *The Cuban Economy – La Economía Cubana | News and
Articles, November 22-28, 2010* On November 22, 2010 @ 7:13 pm

[...] Havana Times, November 22: Cuba’s Costly Social Adjustment &
Intellectual Irresponsibility <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518>[2] [...]
------------------------------

Article printed from Havana Times.org: *http://www.havanatimes.org*

URL to article: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518*

URLs in this post:

[1] The Tragedy of Lay Offs and the Tenderness of Underemployment: *
http://kimbomboqueresbala.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/la-tragedia-del-despido-y-la-ternura-del-subempleo/
*

[2] : *http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33518*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to