“Islam is the Solution”
04/12/10
FIRST, AN apology: I am not going to write about the Wikileaks.
I like gossip as much as the next (wo)man. The leaks provide a lot of it,
interspersed with some real information.
But there is nothing really new there. The
information only confirms what any intelligent person could have worked
out already. If there is anything new, it’s exactly this confirmation:
the world is really managed the way we thought it was. How depressing.
Four hundred years ago, Sir Henry Wotton, a British diplomat,
observed that “An ambassador is an honest man sent to lie abroad for the
good of his country.” Since then, nothing has changed except that the
ambassador has been joined by the ambassadress. So it is quite
refreshing to listen to what they say in secret messages home, when they
don’t have to lie.
That said, let’s move on to more important things.
THIS WEEK’S ELECTIONS in Egypt, for example.
Years ago, the story goes that a Soviet citizen went to the polling
station on election-day and was handed a sealed envelope to put into the
ballot box.
“Aren’t I allowed to see who I am voting for?” he asked.
“Of course not!” the stern-faced official retorted indignantly, “In our Soviet
Union, the elections are secret!”
This could not happen in Egypt. First of all, because Egyptians are a
very humorous people. If told that their elections were secret, they
would burst out laughing.
Second, because they so obviously are not.
On one of my visits to Anwar Sadat’s Cairo, I had the chance to
witness an election day. It was a jolly occasion, more a medieval
carnival than a solemn fulfillment of democratic duty. Everybody was
happy.
Visiting a polling station in a village near the Giza pyramids, I was
struck by this atmosphere of jolly cynicism. No one even pretended that
it was serious. Good-humored soldiers guarding the locale volunteered
to help old women in choosing the right ballot and putting it in the
envelope.
I am not sure whether this good humor has been retained under the
Mubarak regime, but the results are the same. Media editors, all
appointed by the government, prevent any criticism of the government.
Opposition activists are arrested well before election day (if they are
not in prison already). The government party is a sorry joke. No one
seriously pretends that the country is anything but a dictatorship. The
upper classes like it that way, not only out of fondness for their
privileges but also out of a genuine fear that under democracy, their
country would elect a fundamentalist religious regime, with burqas and
all.
ALL OVER the Arab world, this is a real dilemma. Free elections would bring
fundamentalists to power.
During the last century, secular nationalism was in vogue. In many
Arab countries, nationalist movements sprang up. Their model was the
great Ataturk – a revolutionary renovator as no other. He suppressed
Islam, forbade the fez for men and the hijab for women, replaced the
Arabic with the Latin script, fostered Turkish nationalism instead of
the Ottoman Islamism.
This, by the way, was a model for many of us, who aspired to replace
the Jewish religion and Zionist pseudo-nationalism with a healthy Hebrew
territorial secular nationalism. The son of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the
renovator of the modern Hebrew language, also proposed replacing the
Hebrew script with a Latin one.
In Turkey, the Ataturk revolution is now threatened by the upsurge of
a rejuvenated Islam. In Israel, the new Hebrew nation is under siege by
a fundamentalist, aggressive Judaism. All over the Arab world, the
situation is worse.
To put it bluntly: secular nationalism has not delivered. It has
brought no real independence, no freedom, no economic and technological
breakthrough.
In the economic sphere, no Arab country has succeeded in doing what
has been done by Japan, South Korea and even Malaysia, and what is being
done now by China and India. The successful Israeli example is near at
hand and increases the frustration.
The dream of a secular pan-Arab union, as envisioned by Gamal
Abd-al-Nasser and the original Ba’athists, is in tatters. So is the
dream of Arab independence. Almost all Arab countries are backward
American clients and dance to the American tune. A whole generation of
Arab leaders has spectacularly failed.
The most recent example was Yasser Arafat. He created a Palestinian
national movement that was proud of its non-sectarianism. Christian
Arabs played a significant role in the Palestine Liberation
Organization. George Habash was a Christian physician from Ramallah, the
Christian Hanan Ashrawi is one of the most articulate Palestinian
spokespersons.
Arafat himself was a practicing Muslim. Often, even in private
conversations, he would excuse himself, disappear for a few minutes and
return unobtrusively, while his assistants would whisper to us that the
Ra’is was praying. Yet he never tired of assuring everyone that the
future State of Palestine would be free of any religious domination.
As long as he was alive, political Islam remained a minor influence, and not
because of any repressive measures.
ALL THIS is history. The Sunni Hamas (“Islamic Resistance Movement”)
and the Shiite Hezbollah (“Party of God”) are becoming the models for
masses of young people all over the Arab world.
One of the major reasons for this is Palestine.
If Arafat had succeeded in founding the free and sovereign State of
Palestine, the texture of Arab politics would have changed, not only in
Palestine itself but in all Arab countries.
The rise of Hamas in Palestine is a direct result of this failure.
Secular Palestinian nationalism has been given a try, and has failed.
The Islamic revolutionaries are appealing to a people deprived of all
national and human rights, with no alternative in sight.
As the Wikileaks show (here I go, mentioning them after all) not one
single Arab regime gives a damn about the Palestinians. That is nothing
new – indeed, Arafat created his movement, Fatah (‘Palestinian
Liberation Movement”), in order to liberate the Palestinians, first of
all, from the cynical Arab regimes, all of which exploited the
“Palestinian Cause” for their own ends.
But the depth of cynicism revealed in these conversations between
Arab potentates and their American masters borders on outright betrayal.
This will increase the already massive frustration not only in
Palestine, but in all Arab countries. Any young Egyptian, Jordanian,
Saudi or Bahraini (to mention only a few) must be acutely aware that his
country is led by a small group for whom the preservation of their
personal power and privileges is vastly more important than the holy
cause of Palestine.
This is a deeply humiliating insight. It may not produce immediate
results, but when hundreds of millions of people feel humiliated, the
effects are foreseeable. The older generation may be used to this
situation. But for young people, especially proud Arabs, it is
intolerable.
I am very sensitive to this kind of feeling, because at the age of 15
I felt the same and joined the “terrorist” Irgun (“National Military
Organization”). I just could not stand the sight of my leaders kowtowing
before the British rulers of my country. Putting myself in the shoes of
a young Arab of similar age now in Jeddah, Alexandria or Aleppo, I can
just imagine what he feels. Even Ehud Barak, that veteran Arab-fighter,
once said that if he were a young Palestinian, he would join a terrorist
organization.
Sooner or later, the situation will explode – first in one country,
then in many. The fate of the Shah of Iran should be remembered by those
who speak – in secret documents – about the “Iranian Hitler” who is on
the verge of obtaining a nuclear bomb.
THE FRUSTRATION about Palestine is the immediate cause of this
humiliation, being manifest for all to see, but the feeling itself goes
beyond one single cause.
Secular nationalism has signally failed the Arabs. Communism has
never taken root in the Islamic world, being by its very nature inimical
to the basic tenets of Islam. Capitalism, while attractive to some, has
also failed to solve any of the basic problems of the Arab world.
The Islamic revolutionary movement in its many forms promises a
viable alternative. It is no fluke that the Egyptian dictatorship
forbids the use of the slogan “Islam is the Solution” – the simple and
effective slogan that unites the Islamic opposition in all the
countries. There is a gaping vacuum in the Arab world, with no one there
to fill it – except Islamism.
FOR THE US, this is a huge challenge. Obama seemed to have perceived
it, before he was swallowed – head and body – by the American political
routine.
Everybody seems to be talking about the Decline of the American
Empire. It’s all the rage. What’s happening in the Arab world may
accelerate or slow this process. The creation of a sovereign, free and
viable State of Palestine – with the electrifying effect this would have
throughout the Arab region, indeed the entire Islamic world - would
slow it considerably.
Judging from these leaks, this seems very far from the minds of American
statesmen and stateswomen, such as they are.
For Israel, the outlook is even grimmer. The prospect of a
fundamentalist Arab world, with a completely new and popular set of
leaders, surrounding us on all sides, with the power of America (and its
Jewish lobby) declining ever more, is a frightening prospect indeed.
If I were responsible for Israel at this moment, I would worry about this much
more than about the Iranian bomb.
Fortunately, this is not an inescapable danger. Israeli policy can do
a lot to avert it. Unfortunately, we are doing the exact opposite.
To those who chant “Islam is the Solution”, our answer should be: “A just Peace
is the
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1291467977
COMMENT:
I am Muslim, and I see NO conflict between the title of Avnery's column, and
his conclusion. I hope he doesn't, either.
Hajja Romi
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
