Hi. It's unfortunate so many valuable events happen during holidays
and drive away vacations.  Last night's celebration of Phil Ochs, and
now this, an anticipated great performance by a superb actor about 
an incredible aritist.  For what it's worth, I've worked with Roger and
seen him in films and plays here, including Huey, the play he also
wrote about Huey Newton.  I'll assume he wrote this one, as well.
Everything he does is wonderful.  Strongly recommended.  -Ed

http://www.juancole.com/

Senate Repeal of DADT in Global Context
by Juan Cole

Juan Cole's Blog:12/19/2010

Conservative religious fanatics lost on 'don't ask, don't tell' and anti-gay 
discrimination. The scary thing is, that since it is clear that 
fear-mongering on gays will no longer win elections in the next generation, 
the turn to hate-mongering against Muslims may accelerate.

So the Senate has repealed 'don't ask, don't tell,' the compromise policy on 
gays serving in the military.

The real question is why treatment of gays is such a hot button issue in the 
United States in the first place. Since America is a big island, only a 
third of Americans even have a passport, and US media carefully protects 
Americans from points of view emanating from abroad, most Americans would 
probably be surprised to discover that their country is an outlier among 
industrialized democracies in its treatment of gays.

If we take full marriage rights as a proxy for gay rights in general, then 
Argentina, Holland, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Denmark, 
Sweden and Iceland are all heads and shoulders above federal US policy.

Gays can serve openly in the military in Russia, Ukraine, Canada, South 
Africa, Salvador, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, Peru, Uruguay, Israel, 
Nepal, Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, Australia, New Zealand, and 
virtually all of Europe including the Balkans with the exceptions of Greece 
and Turkey.

Is there anything that would make sense of this world pattern? I can make 
three suggestions. First, gay rights, including marriage rights, have been 
implemented by some countries that suffered a long period of fascist or 
other authoritarian governance, and which rebelled against it. Franco's 
fascist Spain, in place from 1936-1975, gave way to a new Spanish 
parliamentary regime and in recent years to Spanish socialism. Fascist 
regimes affected a macho heterosexual patriarchy and typically ruthlessly 
persecuted gays. Fascist regimes also often, being nativist, had a special 
relationship to the Church (yes, Hitler was a believing Catholic) and took 
cues on public morality from the remnants of the Inquisition. (This is by no 
means to deny that many conscientious Catholics and priests vigorously 
opposed fascism). In Franco's Spain mere admission of being gay could lead 
to imprisonment, rape and torture.

Calvinist, Protestant regimes such as Apartheid South Africa were likewise 
highly oppressive, patriarchal and heterosexual. The hierarchical rightwing 
society, which placed adult men of the most favored race, at the top of the 
society, was challenged by any group that did not easily fit on the social 
ladder or who challenged its legitimacy. The Apartheid regime in South 
Africa


  "South Africa's apartheid army forced white lesbian and gay soldiers to 
undergo 'sex-change' operations in the 1970's and the 1980's, and submitted 
many to chemical castration, electric shock, and other unethical medical 
experiments. Although the exact number is not known, former apartheid army 
surgeons estimate that as many as 900 forced 'sexual reassignment' 
operations may have been performed between 1971 and 1989 at military 
hospitals, as part of a top-secret program to root out homosexuality from 
the service. "

Gay rights came to form part of a human-rights backlash against rightwing 
policies in South Africa, Spain and Argentina, then. Although it does not 
yet extend to full marriage rights, a residue of reaction against central 
European fascism informs the general European commitment to 
non-discrimination against gays.

Second, gay rights are prominent in countries, as with Scandinavia, where 
there is a greater degree of gender equality and where women serve in large 
numbers in the legislatures. One suspects that just as anti-Apartheid 
activists saw an affinity between oppressed black Africans and 
discriminated-against gays, so Scandinavian feminists found a commonality 
with gays in confronting hetero male supremacism.

But third, and inescapably, religious fanaticism obviously plays a 
significant role in denying rights to gays. There is a direct relationship 
between rightwing Catholicism, rightwing evangelicalism, rightwing Hinduism, 
and rightwing Islam on the one hand, and discrimination against gays on the 
other.

Hindu India has been among the worst democratic countries for gay rights in 
modern history, and only in 2009 finally made it legal even to be gay 
(though it is still illegal to have a gay relationship!). Greece has a 
little-noted almost theocratic relationship at times with the Eastern 
Orthodox Church. Sri Lanka, obsessed by Theravada Buddhism, is like an 
island prison for gays, at least as far as the law goes. Despite widespread 
experimentation with gay sex in the Muslim world, which has an old history 
(half of the love poems in the Diwan of classic Abbasid poet Abu Nuwas are 
about young men), the public policies toward gays, shaped in part by the 
influence of the Muslim clergy, are among the worst in the world. And it is 
where the Church is strongest in the Catholic world that gays are treated 
worst.

Regional policy can also differ from national policy where one region of a 
country is more religious than another. And here we come to the United 
States. White, rightwing evangelicals have been among the most vocal 
opponents of gay rights in the United States (along with rightwing 
Catholics, African-American Protestants, and Mormons). Once the religious 
Right became politically active from the 1970s forward, and especially with 
the swing of white southern and western evangelicals to the Republican Party 
as a result of the Nixon Strategy in the aftermath of the enfranchisement of 
African-Americans, the Republican Party became a bastion of anti-gay 
policies and legislation, despite the significant gay constituency inside 
the party in the Northeast and the Bay Area of California.

Only six Republicans voted 'yes' in the procedural vote that allowed the 
DADT repeal to go forward in the Senate.

The Republican Party in the US is a coalition of groups, and ironically 
includes some relatively liberal factions (the Log Cabin Republicans, e.g., 
who sued over DADT). But religious ultra-conservatives are a key demographic 
for the party, and probably are growing in importance within it, according 
to Gallup. The ultra-conservatives are disproportionately white and 
committed Protestants (likely mostly evangelicals).

The mainstream Republican Party's view on many social issues thus resembles 
that of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party and the Muslim 
Brotherhood and related parties in the Muslim world far more than it does 
the 'conservative' parties of Scandinavia and continental Europe. Religion 
is a big part of the reason, but likely the other two factors play a role. 
Frankly, many American whites still have a hierarchical view of race and 
sexual identity in America, and many have relatively authoritarian views of 
governance-favoring the National Security State over individual rights, e.g.

As in Europe, where some far-right parties such as that of LePen in France 
that used to bait gays have recently posed as their defenders from Muslim 
immigrants, we can expect the American Right to play the same game. A plea 
here to progressive gays not to fall for it, and to American Muslims to 
stand for tolerance for other discriminated-against groups.

***

----- Original Message ----- 
From: roger smith 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 9:07 AM
Subject: Fw: In Honor of Jean-Michel Basquiat - Wednesday, Dec. 22 at Bootleg




 In Honor of Jean-Michel Basquiat - Wednesday, Dec. 22 at Bootleg








ROGER GUENVEUR SMITH returns to BOOTLEG THEATER 

with an intimate solo performance on what would have been the artist's 50th 
birthday.

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 22nd at 8pm




Admission is Free


In the Bootleg Speakeasy. 


Bootleg Theater - 2220 Beverly Blvd., LA 90057

213-389-3856 www.bootlegtheater.org

Photo by ALISA ADONA



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to