http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/03/02/the-definition-of-hypocrisy/
The definition of hypocrisy By Jody McIntyre The Independent/UK: 2 March, 2011 Arming both sides of a conflict must be a tactic David Cameron learnt from Gaddafi himself; we have been quite happily selling weapons to the Gaddafi regime until now, but now Cameron wants to "arm Libyan rebels". The issue here is not the morality or legitimacy of the Gaddafi regime; we have seen Libyan people demonstrating in their thousands, and being murdered for doing so, but the issue is the complete and utter hypocrisy of western intervention in the region. From country to country, the pattern is the same; support the dictators, as long as they support our interests, and arm them with any weapons they like, but if the people of that country rise up effectively, deny any contact or prior relationship and condemn the use of those weapons you sold them. David Cameron recently travelled to Egypt to meet with leading members of the Egyptian army, accompanied by BAE Systems, a British arms manufacturer. So the message is clear: "Hello, possible new leaders of Egypt, can we sell you some weapons?" And the pattern continues. In the case of Libya, the drums of war are being beaten at an alarming rate. They were the first state ever to be suspended from the United Nations Human Rights Council, for committing "gross and systematic violations of human rights". Of course, this doesn't mean Libya is the first state to violate human rights, it just means they are a convenient villain at the current moment in time. The UK and US governments ponder over the establishment of a "no-fly zone" across the country, and US navy ships close in on Libyan shores, in case "military intervention" is necessary. Can they not see the posters the demonstrators are hanging from building tops in Benghazi, saying "We do not want foreign intervention"? Or the Libyan air pilots flying to Malta, refusing to attack their own people? If there is one thing the recent uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia have shown, it is that people in the Arab world are capable of dealing with their own affairs. They do not want regime-change "Iraq-style", where it is accompanied by death, destruction and misery, and followed by a fake, US-imposed "democracy". We do not need another war in the Arab world, another extension of neo-colonialism; we need to let the Libyan people determine their own future. When the Venezuelan representative stood up at the UN and suggested that mediation would be a better solution than war, he was later described by the United States representative as "delusional". As usual, the tables of reality are reversed; the voice of reason is portrayed as the crazed lunatic, and the call for war is presented as a move for peace. The Libyan authorities have committed some reprehensible acts, but it is not Gaddafi who dropped atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Gaddafi is responsible for the deaths of thousands of his own people, but the United States are responsible for the deaths of many more in Iraq and Afghanistan. Perhaps they should keep their mouths quiet, instead of making frantic efforts to dip their blood-stained hands into Libyan oil barrels. One thing must be made clear, David Cameron's threats of interference are not being made in the interests of the Libyan people. If we had any interest in the welfare of the Libyan people, we would not have sold Gaddafi weapons, and trained his police force. The Libyan people would never opt for the invasion and occupation of their own country by foreign forces, and the untold misery and suffering that would inevitably result in, so this is purely for the sake of protecting our own interests. The interests of Shell and BP, lying in the black gold beneath Libya's soil. Western governments do not fear a Libya run by Gaddafi, they fear a Libya without him. *** Marty Hittleman is President of the California Federation of Teachers, a unit of the nation-wide American Federation of Teachers. Most of California's Commuinity and State College faculty are in this union. Ed ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 9:25 AM Subject: Re: Political Endorsement for March 8 Election on March 8 Here are my recommendations: These are progressive and union friendly candidates. City of Los Angeles Council District #2 – Paul Krekorian Council District #4 – Tom LaBonge Council District #6 – Tony Cardenas Council District #8 – Forescee Hogan-Rowles Council District #10 – Herb Wesson Council District #12 – Mitch Englander Council District #14 – Jose Huizar Measures – G: Measure G has been agreed to by labor and elected officials. It is a new lower tier for police and firefighters for their pensions. I disagree with reducing pensions and two tier systems of benefits for workers and will be voting NO H: Measure H restricts campaign contributions from city contract bidders. I support this effort and will be voting YES. I: Measure I was put on the ballot by the City Council to create an independent analysis of the Department of Water and Power (DWP) power and water rates. I support this effort and will be voting YES. J: Measure J requires the DWP to submit a preliminary budget by March 31 for the next fiscal year and sets up a procedure to transfer “surplus funds” from DWP to the City’s reserve fund. This is a wise move and I will be voting YES. L: Measure L increases the City’s property tax that go to public libraries to .03% of assessed value. I support libraries and will be voting YES. M: Measure M would impose a %50 tax for every $1,000 of gross receipts at medical marijuana dispensaries. It may actually raise little money since most dispensaries are non-profit and the sale of marijuana is a federal crime. I will vote YES in order to start the ball rolling on taxing the sale of marijuana. N: Measure N revokes the campaign finance regulations in the City Charter that have recently been ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. I will vote YES to bring the City into compliance with the federal ruling. O; Measure O is an oil severance tax. It would raise about $4 million in California. I am voting YES to tax oil as it comes out of the ground. I find it ridiculous that a corporation can own oil that has been produced over millions of years. Not taxing it makes the situation even worse. It belongs to all of us and all of us should benefit. P: Measure P creates a mandatory Emergency Reserve Account that equals at least 2.5% of the general fund receipts predicted for the upcoming fiscal year. It would take a 2/3rd vote of the Council and the mayors agreement or 3/4 of Council to approve using any of the reserve. I find putting aside money that you can’t use by majority vote of the Council and the signature of the Mayor to be a major error. We need services in Los Angeles and should us our resources when we need them. I believe in majority rule and will be voting NO on Measure P. Q: Measure Q would expand civil service exemptions for some management positions and several other technical changes. There are no arguments against this change in the ballot brochure. I will vote YES on Q. Los Angeles Unified School District Board District #1 – Marguerite Lamotte Board District #5 - Bennett Kayser Los Angeles Community College District Trustee Seat #1 – Mona Field Trustee Seat #3 – Steve Veres Trustee Seat #5 – Scott Svonkin Trustee Seat #7 – Miguel Santiago I hope you find this helpful. Marty Hittelman [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
