GOP Congressman: NPR Defunding 'Does Not Actually Save Taxpayer Dollars'

 

Yesterday, the House narrowly voted to defund NPR by prohibiting taxpayer 
dollars from being used by local radio stations to purchase NPR content. Every 
single Democrat voted against the bill, joined by seven Republicans, and one, 
Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI), who voted "present." Amash opposes taxpayer funding 
for NPR, but explained his opposition in a statement to Fox News by noting that 
the bill voted on yesterday would not save a dime of taxpayer money:

The federal government does not subsidize NPR directly. Instead, the government 
funds the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a government entity, which has 
discretion to provide funding to whichever private radio producers it chooses. 
H R 1076 does not actually save taxpayer dollars; it merely blocks CPB from 
exercising its discretion to send funding to NPR. The funds CPB does not send 
to NPR under the bill are returned to CPB to be spent subsidizing other private 
radio producers. I offered an amendment in the Rules Committee to require that 
any funds not sent to NPR be redirected to pay down the deficit, but the 
amendment was ruled out of order. Therefore, public broadcasting will not see 
any reduction in federal funding even if this bill becomes law.

Republicans have claimed stripping taxpayer dollars from NPR is about the need 
to cut spending and rein in the deficit. "[W]e are all about looking for ways 
to cut right now and save," House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) said after 
the vote yesterday. "[W]e’ve got to listen to the executives at N.P.R. that say 
they don't need taxpayer funding." But as Amash and many Democrats have 
correctly pointed out, the bill doesn't actually save taxpayer money — it 
merely moves around money already allocated to the Corporation for Public 
Broadcasting, away from NPR and to other public broadcasting operations. Amash 
also wrote that the bill is "arguably unconstitutional and definitely violates 
the Rule of Law," because "it likely is a bill of attainder."





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to