Saturday, March 26, 2011
 Protesting the Empire as Obama
visits<http://luterano.blogspot.com/2011/03/protesting-empire-as-obama-visits.html>

My post <http://luterano.blogspot.com/2011/03/obama-visits-el-salvador.html>on
US president Obama's visit to El Salvador on Tuesday pretty much
reflected the coverage in Salvadoran and US mass media: Smiling
schoolchildren waving US and Salvadoran flags. Two presidents elected on
platforms of hope and change giving a press conference. A somber Obama
visiting the tomb of Oscar Romero. A state dinner (where the pupusa was
featured<http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/World/Story/STIStory_648658.html>).
This portrayal of the visit earned me a complimentary email from a contact
at the US Embassy.

But not everyone was happy to see Barack Obama on Salvadoran soil.
Protesters in the streets of San Salvador and in cyberspace raised their
voices against a variety of aspects of US policy impacting this tiny country
in Central America.

The video below <http://www.youtube.com/embed/8YerqBqbFhE> from the SHARE
Foundation shows some of the protests which were centered around the Plaza
Salvador del Mundo. As the statue of the Divine Savior of the World looked
on, a potpourri of civil society groups marched, demonstrated, and voiced
their anger:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8YerqBqbFhE



A regular theme seen and heard from the demonstrators was the
characterization of the US as the "empire," imposing its imperial will
throughout Latin America and the rest of the world on behalf of
multi-national corporations.  ContraPunto described the demands of
protesters<http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/cat-sociedadcivil/la-sociedad-civil-se-hace-oir-por-obama>who
gathered at the Plaza Salvador del Mundo.  The Voices
from El Salvador blog also provided
photos<http://voiceselsalvador.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/obama-in-el-salvador/>
from
the protests.  There was an alphabet soup of civil society organizations,
and their messages included demands that Obama leave the country, that CAFTA
be repealed, for closure of the US-sponsored International Law Enforcement
Academy, for immigration reform, for freedom for the Cuban
Five<http://www.freethefive.org/>,
and in opposition to gold mining. ContraPunto also noted that:

Undoubtedly one thing most repudiated by protesters was the visit the crypt
of Monsignor Romero [by Obama]. The Ecumenical Coordination of the Church
and the Poor in El Salvador (CEIP) said it was an insult to the memory of
Romero because he sought to build peace and the United States does not.

As Obama visited the Metropolitan Cathedral and Romero's tomb, the security
presence was tight.   A police source told
ContraPunto<http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/politica-nacionales/sin-mayor-algarabia-visita-de-obama-a-tumba-de-romero>that
there were sharpshooters on top of the National Palace and the
National
Theater.   How could you not be reminded of the sharpshooters from the
US-backed government who fired on the thousands of mourners at Romero's
funeral from those same perches?

Father Roy Bourgeois, founder of SOA Watch, told
NCRonline<http://ncronline.org/news/obama-romeros-grave-missed-opportunity>
that
Obama's visit to Romero's tomb fell short:

Obama’s visit "could have been a historic moment," Bourgeois said, one
similar to former President Clinton’s rare apology for the US role in the
training and arming of Guatemalan security forces that slaughtered more than
200,000 civilians.

"Obama didn’t even acknowledge, let alone apologize for, the U.S. role in El
Salvador," Bourgeois said.

Before arriving in El Salvador, Obama visited Chile where he declined a
request to apologize for the US-backed coup that brought Augusto Pinochet to
power. A U.S. Senate committee long ago confirmed that the CIA had
orchestrated the coup, and SOA records show that hundreds of Chilean
officers went through the school in the 24 months prior to the 1973 coup.
Obama refused to offer an apology despite the fact that he told Chileans
that a necessary ingredient to create a democracy is "accountability for
past wrongs."


<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XHJ0wvWP3A8/TYwE4qVebfI/AAAAAAAAAik/75QRdXr9aMU/s1600/ObamaEmpire.jpg>Prominently
on sale in San Salvador was Fidel Castro's book, Obama and the Empire.
Diario CoLatino published an interview with the Cuban
Ambassador<http://www.diariocolatino.com/es/20110324/nacionales/90791/Para-Cuba-Obama-no-es-m%C3%A1s-que--%C2%ABuna-pieza-m%C3%A1s-del-Imperio%C2%BB.htm?tpl=69>
about
the book.

Greg Grandin, author of Empire's Workshop: Latin America, the United States,
and the Rise of the New
Imperialism<http://www.amazon.com/Empires-Workshop-America-United-Imperialism/dp/0805077383>,
wrote about Obama's visit in an article titled Barack Obama, Oscar Romero
and Structural 
Sin<http://www.thenation.com/blog/159405/barack-obama-oscar-romero-and-structural-sin>
in
the Nation. He concludes:

We can only hope that Obama finds inspiration in Oscar Romero’s life:
Romero, after all, started his public career as a cautious moderate who
believed he could quietly work with El Salvador’s ruling class to coax
needed reform. The reality of Salvadoran society forced his conversion into
an outspoken, confrontational leader who directly attacked those who
perpetuated what he called “structural sin:” “When the church hears the cry
of the oppressed,” Romero wrote before his murder, “it cannot but denounce
the social structures that give rise to and perpetuate the misery from which
the cry arises.” If Romero was alive today, he would recognize CAFTA’s
Chapter 10, along with the broader, disastrous policies Washington is
pursuing in the Mexico-Central America-Colombia security corridor, as prime
examples of “structural sin.”

But at El Faro <http://www.elfaro.net/es/201103/noticias/3786/>, they noted
that even the hard-line leaders of the FMLN, who have often used the
anti-empire theme in their rhetoric in the past, had toned it down:

The speeches against America or against certain policies of that country
were not even remotely heard during the recent commemoration of their March
election victory of two years ago. FMLN leader Salvador Sanchez Ceren, who
in late 2009 said they had to fight "against the empire" in reference to the
United States, said Saturday before hundreds of supporters that Obama's
visit is "good news."

The Salvadoran vice president also chose to remember the U.S. accompaniment
of  El Salvador to reach the 1992 peace agreements but avoided mentioning
[the US] military and logistical support which had supported some of the
past dictatorships in El Salvador and more than once have been part of FMLN
speeches.

Much of the reaction to Obama's visit by Salvadoran bloggers seemed to be
negative.  Omar Nieto described the discourse in the blogosphere in a post
for Global 
Voices<http://globalvoicesonline.org/2011/03/25/el-salvador-citizen-reactions-to-obamas-visit/>.
 As an example, he cites a post by Carlos
Molina<http://www.contrapunto.com.sv/columnistas/nos-visita-obama-senor-de-la-guerra-global>
:

Why can’t we say anything to the genocidal power that comes to our house? We
are afraid, it’s clear. Our fear is the same as that of someone who's had a
family member kidnapped, the [fear] of blackmail that inhabits our
nightmares: “You let me put a few [military] bases and I do not deport your
father, your sister, your cousin …” (translation by Global Voices))

Bloggers like Victor in Alta Hora de la
Noche<http://altahoradelanoche.blogspot.com/>,
also reflected on the stop at Romero's tomb:

Monsignor Romero is not honored with the visit of the man alleged to be “the
world's most powerful man”. He is honored by a memorial mass, or when an
elderly couple from the very poor county of Morazán tell me with a smile
that despite their physical aches due to the long journey, it was worth it.
At last they have come to the Bishop’s grave, their Bishop.

Members of the anti-mining movement also used Obama's visit as a reason to
raise their policy concerns. They focused attention on the impact of the
DR-CAFTA trade agreement of which the US and El Salvador are parties. In
particular, they pointed to DR-CAFTA's investor protection provisions which
have allowed North American gold mining companies to bring arbitration
claims against the government of El Salvador when the companies are denied
the opportunity to mine for gold out of concern for the environment.

Members of the National Roundtable against Mining held a press
conference<http://esnomineria.blogspot.com/2011/03/conferencia-de-prensa-21-de-marzo.html>to
voice their concerns about the lawsuits authorized under DR-CAFTA .
Originally, the $77 million lawsuit of Pacific Rim against El Salvador under
DR-CAFTA was scheduled to have hearings in Washington, D.C. which would have
overlapped Obama's visit. For reasons which were not immediately known,
those hearings were rescheduled until
May<http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=OpenPage&PageType=AnnouncementsFrame&FromPage=Announcements&pageName=Announcement85>.
 The confluence of Obama's visit and the prospective start to the hearings
gave a push to the mining activists work.

Activists in the US in solidarity with the Salvadoran anti-mining movement
worked to get concerned members of Congress involved.  19 members of the US
Congress signed a letter to President
Obama<http://cispes.org/documents/ElSalvadorLetter3.18.11.pdf>which
was released in connection with the visit to El Salvador.   The letter
called on Obama to act to eliminate investor protection provisions in trade
agreements like CAFTA which allow multi-national corporations to bring
arbitration suits for millions of dollars in damages against countries
challenging enforcement of environmental regulations.

The impact of the US and its policies in El Salvador is undeniably enormous.
 That power has been, and will likely continue to be, exercised both for
good and for evil.   The demonstrations in El Salvador this week show that
civil society groups intend to hold the governments in both countries
accountable.

http://luterano.blogspot.com/2011/03/protesting-empire-as-obama-visits.html


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to