From: Portside Moderator [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 9:25 PM

 

[moderator: Manning Marable died Friday April 1, 2011 just days before his
new book "Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention" was due to be released.  This
2005 interview offers a tantalizing preview of the book to come.

 

Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention

Release date: April 4, 2011

Hardcover, 608 pages

Viking Adult

ISBN-10: 0670022209

ISBN-13: 978-0670022205]

 

http://www.democracynow.org/2005/2/21/the_undiscovered_malcolm_x_stunning_ne
w

 

The Undiscovered Malcolm X: Stunning

New Info on the Assassination, His Plans to Unite the Civil Rights and Black
Nationalist Movements & the 3 'Missing' Chapters from His Autobiography Amy
Goodman interviews Manning Marable Democracy Now February 21, 2005 

 

On this the 40th anniversary of the assassination of Malcolm X, we spend the
hour with historian Manning Marable who has spent a decade working on a new
biography of Malcolm X. He is one of the few historians to see the three
missing chapters from "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" that he says paint a
very different picture than the book with Alex Haley and Spike Lee's film.
Marable has also had unprecedented access to Malcolm's family and documents
that shed new light on the involvement of the New York Police, the FBI and
possibly the CIA in Malcolm X's assassination. Manning today called on the
federal government to release all remaining classified documents on Malcolm
X.

40 years ago today on February 21, 1965 Malcolm X was shot dead as he spoke
at the Audubon Ballroom in Harlem. He had just taken the stage when shots
rang out riddling his body with bullets. Malcolm X was 39 years old.

At his funeral, the actor and civil rights activist Ossie Davis hailed
Malcolm as "our Black shining prince."

Today commemorations are scheduled across the country.

In New York, the Center for Contemporary Black History and the Institute for
Research in African-American Studies at Columbia University are sponsoring
"Malcolm X: Life After Death-the Legacy Endures" an educational forum and
radio broadcast. The program will be chaired by historian Manning Marable,
founding director of the Institute for Research in African-American Studies.

The historic Abyssinian Baptist Church is also hosting a national
commemoration of Malcolm X with Percy Sutton, Sonia Sanchez, Haki Madhubuti,
Dr. James Turner, Gil Noble, Rev. Herbert Daughtry and M-1 of Dead Prez.

Later this year, the Audubon Ballroom is scheduled to reopen as the Malcolm
X and Dr. Betty Shabazz Memorial and Education Center on May 19 on what
would have been Malcolm's 80th birthday.

Meanwhile Columbia University professor Manning Marable is working on a
major new biography on Malcolm X. Marable has already spent 10 years
researching the book which is tentatively titled "Malcolm X: A Life of
Reinvention."

Today Professor Marable joins us in our Firehouse Studios to discuss the
legacy of Malcolm X as well as some of his new findings.

Marable has said "Malcolm X was potentially a new type of world leader,
personally drawn up from the 'wretched of the earth into a political
stratosphere of international power. And telling that remarkable, true story
is the purpose of my biography."

Marable's research has raised new questions about The Autobiography of
Malcolm X which was written with Alex Haley. Marable has also examined
un-redacted FBI files which provides new insight into the role of FBI and
the New York Police Department in the assassination of Malcolm X

We will be joined by Professor Marable in a moment, but first we begin with
the words of Malcolm X recorded a month before he was killed. In January
1965 he gave a speech entitled "Prospects for Freedom."

*       Malcolm X, speaking in January 1965 giving a speech entitled
"Prospects for Freedom." Courtesy of the Pacifica Radio Archives
<http://www.pacificaradioarchives.org/> .
*       Manning Marable, one of America's most influential and widely read
scholars. He is Professor of History and African-American Studies at
Columbia University, and founding Director of the Institute for Research in
African-American Studies. He has been working on a new biography of Malcolm
X for more then ten years. It will be published by Viking in 2008.

AMY GOODMAN: We will be joined by Professor Marable in just a moment, but
first we begin with Malcolm X himself in words recorded just a months before
he was assassinated. It was January 1965, he gave this speech entitled
"Prospects for Freedom."

MALCOLM X: When this country here was first being founded, there were 13
colonies. The whites were colonized. They were fed up with this taxation
without representation. So some of them stood up and said, liberty or death.
I went to a white school over here in Mason, Michigan. The white man made
the mistake of letting me read his history books. He made the mistake of
teaching me that Patrick Henry was a patriot and George Washington-wasn't
nothing non-violent about old Pat or George Washington. Liberty or death was
what brought about the freedom of whites in this country from the English.
They didn't care about the odds. Why, they faced the wrath of the entire
British Empire. And in those days, they used to say that the British Empire
was so vast and so powerful, the sun would never set on it. This is how big
it was, yet these 13 little scrawny states, tired of taxation without
representation, tired of being exploited and oppressed and degraded, told
that big British Empire, liberty or death. And here you have 22 million
Afro-Americans, black people today, catching more hell than Patrick Henry
ever saw. And I'm here to tell you, in case you don't know it, that you got
a new-you got a new generation of black people in this country, who don't
care anything whatsoever about odds. They don't want to hear you old Uncle
Tom handkerchief heads talking about the odds. No. This is a new generation.
If they're going to draft these young black men and send them over to Korea
or South Vietnam, to face 800 million Chinese. If you are not afraid of
those odds, you shouldn't be afraid of these odds.

AMY GOODMAN: Malcolm X, a month before he was assassinated. It was January
1965 at a speech he gave in New York, sponsored by the Militant Labor Forum.
This is Democracy Now! We're joined by Professor Manning Marable, one of
America's most influential and widely read scholars, professor of history
and African American Studies at Columbia University, founding director of
the Institute for Research in African American studies, again working on a
new biography of Malcolm X. Welcome to Democracy Now!

MANNING MARABLE: Thank you. It's always great to be here.

AMY GOODMAN: It is great to be with you. Why don't you summarize for us-I
mean, you have been studying Malcolm X for more than a decade now-what you
think are the most explosive findings and then throughout the hour, we will
tease them out and talk about them.

MANNING MARABLE: I think that Malcolm X was the most remarkable historical
figure produced by Black America in the 20th century. That's a heavy
statement, but I think that in his 39 short years of life, Malcolm came to
symbolize Black urban America, its culture, its politics, its militancy, its
outrage against structural racism and at the end of his life, a broad
internationalist vision of emancipatory power far better than any other
single individual that he shared with DuBois and Paul Robeson, a
pan-Africanist internationalist perspective. He shared with Marcus Garvey a
commitment to building strong black institutions. He shared with Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr., a commitment to peace and the freedom of racialized
minorities. He was the first prominent American to attack and to criticize
the U.S. role in Southeast Asia, and he came out four-square against the
Vietnam War in 1964, long before the vast majority of Americans did. So that
Malcolm X represents the cutting edge of a kind of critique of globalization
in the 21st century. In fact, Malcolm, if anything, was far ahead of the
curve in so many ways.

AMY GOODMAN: We're going to break and then when we come back, we are a going
to talk about The Autobiography of Malcolm X, the missing chapters, and
where they are, which you have got a chance to see excerpts of.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right.

AMY GOODMAN: We're going to talk about how the autobiography was written,
and the F.B.I., their relationship with Alex Haley. We will talk about these
things and more in just a minute.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: We spend the hour today on Malcolm X, today the 40th
anniversary of his assassination. Our guest is Columbia University Professor
Manning Marable, writing a biography of Malcolm X, and also the editor of
the magazine Souls: A Critical Journal of Black Politics, Culture and
Society. The winter 2005 issue, photograph of Malcolm X on the cover, and
that's what the whole issue is devoted to, with a major article by Professor
Marable. Let's talk about The Autobiography of Malcolm X.

MANNING MARABLE: Okay. The-most people who read the autobiography perceive
the narrative as a story that now millions of people know, and it was-it's a
story of human transformation, the powerful epiphany, Malcolm's journey to
Mecca, his renunciation of the Nation of Islam's racial separatism, his
embrace of universal humanity, of humanism that was articulated through
Sunni Islam. Well, that's the story everybody knows. But there's a hidden
history. You see, Malcolm and Haley collaborated to produce a magnificent
narrative about the life of Malcolm X, but the two men had very different
motives in coming together. Malcolm did-what Malcolm did not know is that
back in 1962, a collaborator of Alex Haley, fellow named-a journalist named
Alfred Balk had approached the F.B.I. regarding an article that he and Haley
were writing together for The Saturday Evening Post, and the F.B.I. had an
interest in castigating the Nation of Islam, and isolating it from the
mainstream of Negro civil rights activity. So consequently, a deal was
struck between Balk, Haley and the F.B.I. that the F.B.I. provided
information to Balk and Haley in the construction of their article, and Balk
was-Balk was really the interlocutor between the F.B.I. and the two writers
in putting a spin on the article. The F.B.I. was very happy with the article
they produced, which was entitled, "The Black Merchants of Hate," that came
out in early 1963. What's significant about that piece is that that became
the template for what evolved into the basic narrative structure of The
Autobiography of Malcolm X.

AMY GOODMAN: Did Alex Haley know about this relationship?

MANNING MARABLE: There is no direct evidence that Haley sat down with the
F.B.I. Nevertheless, since Balk was the co-author of the piece and it was
Balk who talked directly with the F.B.I.-

AMY GOODMAN: Did Haley know-

MANNING MARABLE: One can assume that Haley was involved in it.

AMY GOODMAN: Did Haley at least talk to Balk about-did he know about Balk's
relationship with the F.B.I.?

MANNING MARABLE: One can assume that Haley did because Haley and Balk
co-authored the piece, traveled throughout the United States together and
collected material together to form an article that they co-authored. It
would be highly unlikely that Haley did not know.

AMY GOODMAN: Then the writing of the autobiography, Alex Haley and Malcolm
X's relationship. How did they do it?

MANNING MARABLE: Over a period of-

AMY GOODMAN: And why did Malcolm X choose him?

MANNING MARABLE: Over a period of about year-and-a-half, Malcolm and Haley
agreed to work with each other. They met usually after a long business day
that Malcolm put in very tired. He would get there at about-either at
Haley's apartment or they would meet at then Idyllwild Airport at a hotel,
and Malcolm would be debriefed by Haley. He would talk, Haley would take
notes. Malcolm had a habit of scribbling notes in small pieces of paper that
Haley would surreptitiously pick up at the end of their discussions.
Malcolm's objective was actually to reingratiate himself within the Nation
of Islam, that because he had emerged by the early 1960s as a very prominent
figure outside of the N.O.I., there were critics within the organization
that were saying to the patriarch of the N.O.I., the Honorable Elijah
Mohammad, that Malcolm planned to take over the organization, which was not
true. But nevertheless, Malcolm felt that if he could make a public-a
prominent public statement to show his fidelity to the Honorable Elijah
Mohammad that that might win him back in the good graces of the
organization. But there were internal critics, sharp critics, who were very
opposed to him, and who were very-some of them were members of Elijah
Mohammad's family, such as Herbert Mohammad, Raymond Shareef, who was the
head of the Fruit of Islam, the brother-in-law of-the son-in-law of Elijah
Mohammad. They isolated Malcolm X and kept him out of the newspaper of the
organization Mohammad Speaks for over a year, which is kind of curious. He
was the national spokesperson of the N.O.I., and he wasn't represented in
their own newspaper for over a year. Haley's objective was quite different.
Haley was a republican. He was an integrationist. He was very opposed to
black nationalism. His objective was to illustrate that the racial
separatism of the N.O.I. was a kind of pathological or a kind of-it was the
logical culmination of separatism and racial isolationism and exclusion. He
wanted to show the negative aspects of the N.O.I.'s ideology, Yacub's
history, and all of the ramifications of racial separatism that he felt were
negative, and that Malcolm, being as charismatic as he was, a very
attractive figure, nevertheless, he embodied these kind of negative traits.
Haley felt he could make a solid case in favor of racial integration by
showing what was-to white America-what was the consequence of their support
for racial separatism that would end up producing a kind of hate, the hate
that hate produced, to use the phrase that Mike Wallace used in his 1959
documentary on the Nation of Islam. So, the two men for very different
reasons came together. What is striking is that from almost from the very
beginning of certainly by September and October of 1963, as the book was
being constructed, that Haley was vetting-asking questions to the publisher
and to the publisher's attorney regarding many of the things that Malcolm
was saying. He was worried that he would not have a book that would have the
kind of sting that he wanted. He was also concerned, to use Haley's phrase,
about the purported anti-Semitism of Malcolm X, and so he began to rewrite
words or passages in the book without Malcolm's knowledge. And Haley, in his
own-this is prior to emails-Haley had a tendency to write even more
frequently and voluminously to his agents and his editors than he did
putting pen to paper in his own books. So that one finds in Haley's
archives, or the archives of Anne Romaine, who was going to be his
biographer until her tragic death in 1995, one finds a copious series of
notes from Haley to his editors and attorneys regarding the construction of
the autobiography itself. He wanted to steer the book to accomplish his
political goals, as well as Malcolm's goals.

AMY GOODMAN: Now, Professor Marable, you went to the Haley collection.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right.

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about that experience and how difficult it is,
really, to get original information about Malcolm X, and the Haley example
is just one.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. One of the striking things about doing
research on Malcolm X, and I believe that most Malcolm X researchers could
tell you their own stories, is that there's this paradox of the absence of
critical information. Malcolm X is a person who has inspired-he has been the
muse of several generations of black cultural workers, artists, poets,
playwrights. There are literally a thousand works with the title Malcolm X
in them. There are over 350 films and over 320 web-based educational
resources with the title Malcolm X, yet the vast majority of them are based
on secondary literatures, that is, not on primary source material. In the
case of Alex Haley, Haley's material is located at the University of
Tennessee at Knoxville, primarily. But there are a whole series of elaborate
steps that one has to-has to encounter in order to even begin to do
research. There's an attorney. If you want to photocopy material from that
archive, you have to get permission from the attorney beforehand. You have
to name the exact pages you want to photocopy before you can photocopy them.
So that there are a whole series of steps. You can only use a pencil rather
than a pen to copy down material, etc. It's a laborious process, and it
takes a long time just to do a small amount of research. Fortunately, Anne
Romaine, who was appointed by Haley just before his death to be his own
biographer-

AMY GOODMAN: She was a folk singer?

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. A folk singer and a skillful historian, even
though she was not formally trained in the field. She collected her own
parallel archive to Haley, and without Anne Romaine's archive, which is also
at the University of Tennessee-well, I should-let me put it in a positive
light, with that archive, we have gained extensive knowledge about how Haley
and Malcolm actually worked and how the book, the autobiography, was
constructed. The raw material for chapter 16, a lot of that material, is
actually in Romaine's archives, not in Haley's, which is interesting.

AMY GOODMAN: Hmm.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. But what is most interesting about the book
is that as I have read it over the years, something-something was odd to me.
It's like-you know, Malcolm broke with the N.O.I. in March 1964, and in that
last 11 chaotic months, he spent most of the time outside of the United
States. Nevertheless, he built two organizations in the spring of 1964.
First, Muslim Mosque Incorporated, which was a religious organization that
was largely based on members of the N.O.I. who left with him. It was
spearheaded by James 67X or James Shabazz, who was his chief of staff. Then
secondly was the Organization of Afro-American Unity. This was an
organization that was a secular group. It largely consisted of people that
we would later call several years later Black Powerites, Black nationalists,
progressives coming out of the Black freedom struggle, the northern
students' movement, people-students, young people, professionals, workers,
who were dedicated to Black activism and militancy, but outside of the
context of Islam. There were tensions between these two organizations, and
Malcolm had to negotiate between them and since he was out of the country a
great deal of the time, it was rather difficult for him to do so. It seemed
rather odd that there's only a fleeting reference to the OAAU inside of the
book that's supposed to be his political testament. I wondered about this.
It seemed like something was missing. Well, as a matter of fact, there is.
Three chapters. Those three chapters really represent a kind of political
testament that are outlined by Malcolm X, and to make a long story short,
they're in a safe of a Detroit attorney by the name of Greg Reed. He
purchased these chapters in a sale of the Haley Estate in late 1992 for the
sum of $100,000. Since that time, no historian, or at least I suppose I'm
the exception, very few people have actually had a chance to see the raw
material that was going to comprise these three chapters. The missing
political testament that should have been in the autobiography, but isn't.

AMY GOODMAN: And what is he doing with them?

MANNING MARABLE: Well, they're sitting in his safe. And, I guess the
conundrum-I'm not an attorney or a person who does intellectual property-but
my understanding of the situation is that he owns the property, but he
doesn't own-he owns the physical texts of these chapters, but Mr. Reed does
not own the intellectual property, the content of these chapters, so he
cannot publish them.

AMY GOODMAN: Is this the same attorney Reed who is involved with, perhaps, a
lawsuit to do with Rosa Parks?

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. It's the same one, with the trial with the
hip-hop group that's based in Atlanta, and Gregory Reed-.

AMY GOODMAN: This is Outkast?

MANNING MARABLE: That's right, with Outkast. In fact, I was even-I think
even Reed sent something to me asking me to be a-to give testimony in this
trial, which I promptly said, thanks, but no thanks.

AMY GOODMAN: It's because Outkast used in their music, they use Rosa Parks's
words, her own voice?

MANNING MARABLE: That's right.

AMY GOODMAN: How does the family of Rosa Parks feel about this?

MANNING MARABLE: I cannot really say. I just know what I have seep on the
media. I know that they weren't very happy about this.

AMY GOODMAN: Happy about-

MANNING MARABLE: About Greg Reed's representation, but-

AMY GOODMAN: So, he's not representing them.

MANNING MARABLE: Well, again, I cannot really characterize what is going on
with that lawsuit, because I'm not really a party to it.

AMY GOODMAN: Now, you are the only historian who has seen excerpts of the
attorney Reed, the three chapters that he has in his safe?

MANNING MARABLE: I cannot say that for certain.

AMY GOODMAN: One of the few.

MANNING MARABLE: One of-I could say that very few people have seen it. Reed,
after a series of conversations-Reed said he would allow me to see this.
This was about two years ago. I flew out to Detroit. I asked when could I
come over to the office, and he said, no, let's meet at a restaurant, which
struck me as rather odd. We met at a restaurant. He came with a briefcase,
and he opened the briefcase and he showed me the manuscripts. He said, I'll
let you take a look at this for about 15 minutes. Well, that wasn't very
much time. I was deeply disappointed, nevertheless, in that 15 minute time,
looking at the content, because I'm so familiar with what Malcolm wrote at
certain stages of his own life and development, it became very clear that
there's a high probability he wrote this material sometime between August or
September 1963 to about January 1964. Now, this is a critical moment in his
development. In November 1963, he gives his famous message to the grassroots
address in Detroit, which really kind of marks off the real turning point in
his own development. But I would argue that equally important is a brilliant
address he gives in Harlem in mid-August of 1963, which actually is one of
my favorite addresses by Malcolm, which actually is superior in my judgment
to the message to the grassroots address, where he lays into a critique of
what then is being mobilized, the march on Washington, D.C., the pinnacle of
the civil rights movement. Malcolm envisions a broad-based pluralistic
united front, which is spearheaded by the Nation of Islam, but mobilizing
integrationist organizations, non-political organizations, civic groups, all
under the banner of building black empowerment, human dignity, economic
development, political mobilization. He's already envisioning the N.O.I.
playing a role cooperatively with integrationist organizations. I believe
that if we could see the chapters that are missing from the book, we would
gain an understanding as to why perhaps-perhaps-the F.B.I., the C.I.A., the
New York Police Department and others in law enforcement greatly feared what
Malcolm X was about, because he was trying to build a broad-an unprecedented
black coalition across the lines of black nationalism and integration. And
in way, it presages 30 years ahead of time, the Million Man March.

AMY GOODMAN: Professor Marable, we have to break. When we come back, I want
to ask more about the chapters and also about the assassination of Malcolm
X, 40 years ago today.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: Our guest is Professor Manning Marable of Columbia University,
and long time now writing the biography of Malcolm X, which I see has just
been bought by a publisher, and is going to be coming out in few years.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right, with Viking Penguin. That's right.

AMY GOODMAN: More on these three chapters, what you saw in the restaurant,
and then let's talk about the assassination of Malcolm X.

MANNING MARABLE: Alright. I think that Malcolm was envisioning, even while
he was in the Nation of Islam, a black nationalist progressive strategy
toward uniting black people across ideological, class lines, denominational
religious lines, Christians, as well as Muslims, to build a strong movement
for justice and for empowerment. And I think that that is what frightened
the FBI, and that is what frightened the CIA. That is what they had to stop,
and if one thinks about it, those listeners and our viewers who know the
history of COINTELPRO, the counter intelligence program of the FBI that
occurred in the 1960s and 70s, that in 1965 or 6, that J. Edgar Hoover wrote
an infamous memo called the Black Messiah Memo. He said, "We must stop the
rise of a black messiah." That was the concern that the FBI had more than
anything else. Either Malcolm or Martin could have played the role of a
unifier, but it was-Malcolm as long as he remained within the Nation of
Islam, talking to the converted, he did not represent a fundamental threat
to the American government. But when he began to talk about uniting the very
fractious civil rights movement, when he talked-when he began to negotiate
with people like A. Philip Randolph and Bayard Rustin and Martin and others,
keep in mind that several weeks before Malcolm's assassination, he went to
Selma, Alabama. Dr. King was imprisoned during the mobilization. He went to
Mrs. King, and he told Coretta that, you know, that even though we're very
different people, that we're really about the business of the same struggle.
We just use different tactics. And I want you to understand, and I want you
to convey to your husband that I deeply respect what he is doing. So,
Malcolm had a clear vision and an understanding that we were-that he was a
part of a broad freedom struggle. As his vision became more internationalist
and pan-African, as he began, especially in 1964, after seeing the example
of anti-colonial revolutions abroad and began to articulate and incorporate
a socialist analysis economically into his program, he clearly became a
threat to the US state.

AMY GOODMAN: And explain how events led to this day, 40 years ago, the
assassination of Malcolm X.

MANNING MARABLE: I believe that the evidence will show that there was not so
much a conspiracy, but a convergence of interests with three different
groups that had an interest in eliminating his voice and his vision. The
first group, obviously, is the NYPD, the New York Police Department. They
had their own red squad, which was called BOSS, the Bureau of Special
Services. They had managed to infiltrate Malcolm's organization and the
nation of Islam. And, of course, the FBI. There were over 40,000 pages of
FBI documents of which only about half are currently available to scholars
and researchers. I think that this 40th anniversary of the assassination is
a good opportunity for us to say that now is the time to declassify all FBI
material on Malcolm X. There really is a need for us to challenge the US
government for its refusal to open up its own archives 40 years after the
death of Malcolm. All of that material should be made available to all
researchers and all scholars and to the family of Malcolm X. So that-I
believe that the FBI clearly was concerned, wanted to monitor and disrupt
Malcolm wherever possible. Gene Roberts, one of Malcolm's chiefs of
security, was an NYPD undercover cop. He later went on to bigger things by
being a disruptive force inside of the Black Panther Party. So, that's one
element. A second element was the Nation of Islam. Lynwood X, who was one of
the leaders of the New Jersey mosques of the Nation of Islam, was at the
Audubon Ballroom sitting on the first row. He came in early to observe the
events on the 21st of February. He was taken aside by Benjamin 2X, close
associate of Malcolm and also Reuben X, Reuben X Francis, who was the chief
of security. Lynwood said he just wanted to check out what Malcolm had to
say. But my sense is that perhaps his role was more complicated than simply
that of a bystander. We know from Talmadge Hayer, one of the men who carried
out the assassination, who was shot by Reuben X as he tried to flee the
Audubon after shooting Malcolm X, we know that Hayer confessed years later
to his Imam in prison that there had been a walk-through a week prior to
February 21st at the Audubon Ballroom. So, there was deep knowledge on the
part of members of the Nation of Islam regarding the planning, in sight of
the OAAU and the Muslim Mosque Incorporated regarding the events at the
Audubon. They knew when they were going to be there, they knew what the
schedules were. How did they know this? Well, in part because they had
informants inside of the organization, and in part because, obviously, they
had information that hardly anybody else had. They also knew something else
clearly, that on the day of the assassination, and here we get to the third
group-I think the third group are elements within Malcolm's own entourage.
Elements within Malcolm's own entourage, some of them were very angry with
some of the changes that had occurred with Malcolm. One source of anger,
curiously enough, was that-was the tension between MMI and OAAU, that the
MMI, the Muslim Mosque Incorporated, these were women and men who had left
the Nation of Islam out of loyalty to Malcolm, but then Malcolm continued to
evolve rapidly. He never renounced and never stepped away from a strong
commitment to black nationalism and black self-determination. That's
absolutely clear if you do any analysis of his speeches. But what is clear
is that he incorporated within the framework of black nationalism a
pan-Africanist and internationalist perspective. In doing so, he began to
reassess radically earlier positions sexism and patriarchy. He began to
break with notions of sexism that he had long held as a member of the Nation
of Islam, and began to advance and push forward women leadership in the
OAAU. MMI brothers were very resistant to women such as Lynn Shiflet and
others who emerged as leaders within the OAAU, so one of the tensions that
occurred was around gender equality and gender leadership inside of
Malcolm's entourage.

AMY GOODMAN: Then, that day, there was the presence, or lack of presence, of
the NYPD.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. The NYPD was ubiquitous. They were always
around Malcolm. Whenever Malcolm spoke, there would be one or two dozen cops
all over the place. On this day, the cops were nowhere to be seen. The cops
later explained that they had been pulled off the Audubon in order to go
across the street. Normally, they were in a command center on the second
floor adjacent to the large ballroom in the building. On this day, there
were only two cops at moment of the shooting inside of the building, but
they were as far away as possible from the site of the ballroom. The man who
actually apprehended Talmadge Hayer, the only shooter who was shot at the
site, Thomas Hoy, was actually driving by by accident. So, clearly, they had
been pulled off the case.

AMY GOODMAN: He was an off duty cop.

MANNING MARABLE: That's right. Why did the cops disappear quite literally?
Then there were other kind of curious things. There was a complete failure
of protection of the principal. The MMI brothers, who provided security for
Malcolm had been trained by Malcolm himself that inside of the Nation of
Islam, whenever there is a diversion, you protect the principal. The
principal, in this case Malcolm, clearly was not protected on February 21st.
First off, nobody was checked for weapons as they came in. Now, of course,
people know that over the last several months prior to February 21st, 1965,
the OAAU and MMI tried to get away from the old practices of checking people
at the door for weapons. They wanted people to feel more comfortable. But
the guards themselves did not carry weapons. Now, Malcolm's home had just
been firebombed a week before. The guards didn't carry weapons. Malcolm had
insisted that the guards not carry firearms that day. I have asked James
Shabazz, I've asked other people who are members of the OAAU, Herman
Ferguson and others, what led to that disastrous decision? James Shabazz
said to me with a shrug, you just didn't know Malcolm. Malcolm was adamant,
and that whatever Malcolm wanted, that's what we just did. But I said, this
is highly irresponsible considering that there were death threats that were
constant, that there was FBI surveillance and disruption, and that none of
you carried weapons? Well, that's not quite true, because we later learned
from unredacted FBI files, that we have discovered and that we have archived
in the municipal archives here in the city of New York, that there were at
least, according to the district attorney, at least three undercover cops
who were at the ballroom that day. We know one of their names. We know that-

AMY GOODMAN: What's his name?

MANNING MARABLE: Well, we know that Gene Roberts, who was depicted giving
mouth to mouth resuscitation to Malcolm-

AMY GOODMAN: We only have a minute.

MANNING MARABLE: Was an undercover cop, but who were the others? Two of the
three men, who were imprisoned, Norman Butler and Robert 15x Johnson,
convicted and given life sentences, I'm absolutely convinced were innocent.
The real murderers of Malcolm X have not been caught or punished. I think
that now is the moment for us to rededicate ourselves to learning the truth
about what happened on February 21st. The place to begin is to make all
evidence public, and we have to begin with the federal government, and the
FBI.

AMY GOODMAN: Dr. Manning Marable, I want to thank you very much for being
with us.

MANNING MARABLE: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: Professor Marable is writing a biography of Malcolm X that will
come out in a few years, has a major piece in his magazine, Souls, a
critical journal of black politics, culture and society. Tonight, we'll be
at Columbia University talking more about his investigation. Thank you very
much.

MANNING MARABLE: Thank you, Amy.

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to