http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/03/dispatch_from_el_salvador_obamas_narcos_reagans_commies_and_exporting_violence.html

Dispatch From El Salvador: Obama’s Drug War Feels Eerily Familiar Army and
police guard Albert Camus Middle School in San Salvador. Photo: Rodrigo Sura


by Roberto Lovato <http://colorlines.com/archives/author/roberto-lovato>
ShareThis <javascript:void(0)> |
Print<http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/03/dispatch_from_el_salvador_obamas_narcos_reagans_commies_and_exporting_violence.html#>
 | Comment ( 
2)<http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/03/dispatch_from_el_salvador_obamas_narcos_reagans_commies_and_exporting_violence.html#disqus_thread>

Thursday, March 31 2011, 10:56 AM EST Tags: drug
war<http://colorlines.com/tag/drug%20war>,
el salvador <http://colorlines.com/tag/el%20salvador>, foreign
policy<http://colorlines.com/tag/foreign%20policy>
  
379Share<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcolorlines.com%2Farchives%2F2011%2F03%2Fdispatch_from_el_salvador_obamas_narcos_reagans_commies_and_exporting_violence.html&t=Dispatch%20From%20El%20Salvador%3A%20Obama%E2%80%99s%20Drug%20War%20Feels%20Eerily%20Familiar%20-%20COLORLINES&src=sp>
[image: dispatch_thumbnail.gif] <http://colorlines.com/dispatches>

It all feels intensely familiar, like the days of open conflict between El
Salvador’s people and its government. Angry students marching, covering
their coffee-colored faces with bandanas or masks as they file through the
streets. Giant effigies of U.S. presidents and Uncle Sam next to huge,
colorful banners demanding “*Alto al Militarismo!*” Nervous “security”
demanding to know, “What press do you work for?” before forcing me to pull
out my credentials.

Listening to wiry, tee-shirted student leader “Ana Maria” (a pseudonym) on
the smoke-filled, sun-baked streets of San Salvador, I’m whisked back to
similar scenes in the Cold War years of the 80’s and 90’s. “We’ve had to
organize clandestine meetings because of the intervention of the police on
our campus,” she tells me while glancing occasionally to the left and right
of the long march. “These last days, police intervention on campus has
increased,” she said.

“There’ve been three or four raids on student organizations in the last
week,” added  one of the young leaders who’ve organized in response to the
police’s sudden interest in student political activity. “This is a lot more
than the normal intimidations—searching us, detaining us and other things
that promote paranoia among students. This is the first time the police have
intervened in the university in more than three decades.”

Watching this army of cell phone-wielding protesters through the smoke of
rickety buses, it feels eerily like 1980, the year El Salvador’s civil war
started, after U.S.-trained death squads murdered Monsenor Oscar Arnulfo
Romero—the country’s ultimate symbol of peace, and of the consequences of
militarization. Then, the militarization of society was driven by political
ideologies; today, it is driven by the purported war on drugs. In both
cases, the driving force has been Washington, D.C.’s agenda—and its guns.

Romero’s assassination started El Salvador along the tragic path of war that
was the precursor of and foundation for the current spiral of violence. At
the time, a well-organized popular movement (one of every three Salvadorans
adopted “radicalized” politics during the war, according to the Catholic
University) confronted a long line of violent military dictatorships backed
by several U.S. administrations, Democrat and Republican alike. After the
movement exhausted reform efforts, many saw no choice but to take more
radical measures, including the formation of the five politico-military
Marxist organizations that came together as the Farabundo Marti National
Liberation Front (FMLN). Ana Maria and other Salvadorans’ distrust of the
United States is rooted in the 12 years of civil war that followed. It left
a toll of 75,000 to 80,000 dead, almost 95 percent of whom the United Nation
Truth Commission found were killed by governments backed by successive U.S.
presidents—Carter, Bush and Reagan, who was by far the most aggressive in
his support.

Memories of those clashes with the military now animate the March 14
Revolutionary Student Movement, born just a few weeks ago in response to the
police raids on the National University campus. Prior to two weeks ago,
 police had not set foot on the campus since the war; during the 80’s, the
army was charged with invading, spying on and bombing the campus.
Ironically, the police force that intervened on the campus this month
includes former FMLN combatants, who themselves spent so many years fighting
right-wing militarization of society. Now, they act under the orders of
leftist President Mauricio Funes, who was preparing to host President
Obama<http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/03/obama_in_el_salvador.html>as
students were marching to protest his visit to El Salvador.

[image: lamuerte_obama_033011.jpg]

For Ana Maria and many of her generation of radical Salvadorenas, Obama has
replaced Ronald Reagan as the new face of danger on the tank and
troop-filled streets of San Salvador. The military is the centerpiece of
Obama’s El Salvador agenda. His Central American Citizen’s Security
Partnership offers $200 million in technical assistance and aid to
military-security forces, which he says will “confront the narco-traffickers
and gangs that have caused so much violence.” Students believe the
initiative is once again militarizing daily life, under cover of drug wars.

“The police invaded our organization because they said they were searching
for drugs,” said Ana Maria. “They came in with the excuse that we had heavy
quantities of Diazepam [sleeping medicine] to enter university, to justify
their attempts to create chaos among student groups. *Ridiculo*!”

In tones reminiscent of the feral voices of youth harassed by security
forces in places as distinct as the Banlieues of Clichy-sous-Bois near
Paris, the vecindades of Tepito in Mexico City or the Jordan Downs Housing
projects in Los Angeles, Ana Maria recounted how the “repression” extends
beyond the political realm of the university to the more personal space of
her neighborhood in the very densely populated Salvadoran suburb of
Mejicanos. “You get up, leave your house and there’s an [armed police
officer] outside your building. You go to the bus stop and there’s another
one. My [8-year-old] little sister goes to her school and there’s a soldier
with an M-16 there at 8 a.m. and when she leaves. Wherever you are, they
will ask you ‘Why do you cut your hair this way? Why you wear jeans a
certain way?’ or ‘Do you use drugs?’ “

And with the political astuteness characteristic of a Salvadoran
revolutionary movement and culture that the U.S. State Department has called
one of the “most formidable” in the hemisphere, Ana Maria flips from the
personal back to the geopolitical street. “Obama is visiting El Salvador so
that the U.S. can continue trying  to control the Latin American region,”
she says. “Those bases in Colombia, the reinforcement of the anti-narcotics
division here, are there to put down our social movements. They are all part
of maintaining a military position here—and we will continue to oppose it!”

It’s not just El Salvador. What Ana Maria describes there is part of an
accelerating re-militarization of the Americas under the Obama
administration. There’s Plan Mexico, Plan Colombia and now the Central
American regional plan Obama highlighted during his El Salvador visit. Ana
Maria’s concerns reflect the belief of many that the biggest difference
between the Cold War era and the Obama era is one of targets. Rather than
hunting communist sympathizers and radical nuns, today’s security forces are
obsessed with finding the mostly youthful alleged enemies of the drug
wars—Salvadoran gangs, *narcotraficantes* and, in the words of Secretary of
State Hilary Clinton, “narcoinsurgents.”

[image: elsalvador_antius_033011.jpg]

On the other side of San Salvador, in a heavily air-conditioned meeting hall
of the Central American Parliament, Stanford-educated international
relations expert Hector Perla responds to a recurring question from the
crowd of academics, legislators, journalists and policymakers gathered to
discuss U.S.-Salvadoran relations in the Obama era: “Are you saying that
President Obama is no different from other U.S. Presidents?”

 “What makes Obama different is the Obama doctrine,” says Perla, an
organizer of the conference who is a colleague of mine and an assistant
Professor of Latino and Latin America Studies at the University of
California, Santa Cruz. “The Obama doctrine,” he explains, “uses the *
rhetoric* of respect for human rights, the rhetoric of  peace, poverty
alleviation and social justice on the one hand, while promoting
militarization with the other hand. You can see it clearly in [Obama’s]
visit to the tomb of Monsenor Romero, a man recognized for his calls for
peace. Obama visited the tomb as he was ordering the bombing and killing in
Libya.”

Nowhere are the contours of the Obama doctrine clearer, said Perla, than in
the recent announcement of his $200 million anti-narco-trafficking
initiative for Central America. Obama says it is the foundation for a “new
joint security strategy” set to begin this spring. Perla noted that, in
talking about the program, Obama emphasized its aim to “strengthen courts,
civil society groups and institutions that uphold the rule of law”—but he
left out mention of the funds to train and equip El Salvador’s police and
military forces.

Especially disturbing to Perla, a Salvadoran-American with family on both
sides of the U.S.-Salvadoran divide, is that “nobody is talking about the
failure of those plans (Mexico, Colombia)—how we’ve seen an astronomical
rise in the numbers of killings and human rights abuses in Mexico and
ongoing counterinsurgency and human rights abuses committed under cover of
fighting the drug war in Colombia.”

“In El Salvador, the U.S. is talking about policies of growth and security,
promoting ‘citizen security,’ ” said Perla. “But when you look close, you
see an expansion of many of the same policies of the Bush administration,
only now you will have Plan Centroamerica to connect and integrate Plan
Mexico to the north and Plan Colombia to the south.”

For their part, the Salvadoran government and the FMLN are caught between
the rock of desire to build stronger relations with El Salvador’s most
important source of aid and foreign revenue—namely, Washington, D.C.—and the
hard place of the highly-organized discontent that brought them to power in
the first place. Notably, El Salvador’s government, elected in 2009, has
brought the leftist wave surging through the Americas closest to the U.S.
border. Yet, critics are calling the FMLN’s coziness with Obama and their
zealous pursuit of the U.S.-led drug war misguided and dangerous. And among
the many concerns about that war is it is based on insufficient or shoddy
information.

Consider, for example, the response of Rodrigo Barahona, El Salvador’s
attorney general, when asked how many of the 4,005 homicides committed in
2010 involved the gangs and narcotraffickers seen daily in television
newscasts: “We don’t have a study of that.”

It’s not because he hasn’t tried to conduct such a study. But Barahona’s
efforts to build up information and crime fighting systems are made
extremely difficult by layers of corruption and impunity (“El Salvador has a
culture of disrespect for the law”, he says) left behind by generations of
military dictatorships and right wing governments. So there’s no information
about things like the number of registered versus unregistered guns, for
instance, or the links of extremely rich criminals to poor criminals.
There’s certainly no exploration of poverty’s role in creating violence and
insecurity. The lack of information allows media sensationalism, half truths
and political expediency to become the foundation for policies that can mean
either more life or more death.

[image: el_salvador_policia_033011.jpg]

For his part, Luis Romero of Homies Unidos, which organizes for peace among
and between gangs in El Salvador, notes that the lack of information guiding
the U.S. and Salvadoran governments’ militarized response to gangs mirrors
the U.S.’s own spectacle-driven war on drugs—a war that, he feels, ends up
painting an entire generation of young people and immigrants as criminals.

Romero is a “non-violent gang member” and CNN Hero who started doing
anti-violence work in his homeland after the Salvadoran war ended, when
deportations from the U.S. exported gang culture here and throughout the
Central American basin. He was among the gang members deported from Los
Angeles. In a classic kalo dialect that originated among Chicano prison
gangs, Romero breaks down what he sees as the information gaps that inform
bad policy.

“There are about 26,000 people locked up in the Carcel de Adultos [adult
prison],” he says, adding, “6,000 to 7,000 of those people are
*pandilleros*[gang members]. Who are those other 19,000 people?
They’re probably not the
hard core narcos that the this ‘drug war’ is going to take on.”

Romero and others interviewed point out that El Salvador’s “culture of
violence” also includes many red-blooded, God-loving owners of registered
guns—guns made possible by U.S. gun industry players like AMK Trading, which
one source told me has “a major investment in keeping El Salvador’s gun
control and registration laws very weak.”

Not even the imagery of Salvadoran gangs in U.S. and Salvadoran minds is
grounded in reality. Romero and the Homies have spent time analyzing media
images deployed by politicians and security agencies throughout the region.
Romero’s colleague, Jose Luis Rodriguez pointed out how, for example, images
of tattooed Mara Salvatrucha members are transmitted worldwide as one of the
primary depictions of El Salvador on news reports and in Google searches.
They “are old and they don’t represent the new *pandilleros* who don’t even
sport tattoos, baggy clothes like the OG’s did,” he says. “Real life is
different from television.”

The Homies would prefer that Presidents Funes and Obama invest more in peace
and less on guns in a country in which homicides among a population of 6.5
million will, at current rates, soon catch up to current and rapidly growing
number of homicides in Mexico, which has more than 111 million residents.

Standing beneath a yellow and black poster that resembles an emergency sign
and says “*Cuidado: Machisimo Mata*!” (Careful: Machismo Kills), Roxana
Marroquin’s shy smile and gentle eyes mask the fact that she’s from “the
place that has historically known as the cradle of the human rights
struggle”—my mom’s home state of San Vicente. Like Romero, 35-year-old
Marroquin, a member of the Concertacion Feminista Prudencia Ayala (the
Prudencia Ayala Feminist Consensus) believes that El Salvador will not move
forward against the violence that plagues it until it takes a sincere and
clear look backwards.

“Obama’s visit to the tomb of Monsenor Romero is super complicated because
of what the U.S. has traditionally signified for us: a state that financed
the Salvadoran military to block a revolutionary process,” says Marroquin,
who lost more than a dozen family members, including her father, during the
war.

“The visit to Mosnenor’s tomb is not an act of reparation. It’s an act of
protocol and leaves me even more indignant, especially when he comes here
with more money for guns for the military. How are we to trust that this
anti-narcoticos plan will do anything but increase violence?” she asks.

Marroquin sees a direct line running from the impunity that started the war,
expanded exponentially during the war (only a few of those responsible for
the deaths of the 75,00 to 80,000 deaths have been brought to justice) and
continues unabated after the war. She points, for instance, to the murders
of at least one woman per day, crimes that have given El Salvador one of the
highest rates of femicide in the hemisphere.

“Impunity in this country is rooted and well encrusted in the state,” she
says. “The impunity of the war mixes in with historical fact that women have
not been legal subjects or citizens in this country and we can’t access
justice, which makes it easier to beat or kill us without consequence. You
can hit me, you can ask for forgiveness, but if that forgiveness is not
lived and not felt, is not accompanied by concrete actions to really repair
it, you will hit me again.”

And like the young Ana Maria, Marroquin also believes the solution to the
violence impunity breeds lies in political, even revolutionary action—just
the sort that the growing militarism appears ready to quash. “Citizenship is
constructed daily by our work,” she says. “It is constructed by making our
demands and by the possibility to obligate an institution or an individual
to respect our rights whether that person is a violent husband or the head
of the the military—or the head of a country, like Barack Obama.”

*This report was made possible by support from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis
Reporting<http://pulitzercenter.org/projects/el-salvador-us-latin-america-drugs-femicide>
.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to