The Fact Checker #1
by Michael Dare
There's an old fashioned thing called a copy editor and fact checker 
that newspapers used to have and I was one of them. The job involves 
splitting yourself in two. As a copy editor, I don't give a damn what 
the writer is saying, I'm just verifying it's in proper English 
- spelling and grammar - that's it. First test of being a good copy 
editor, doing it from the bottom up, paying no attention to content, 
just making sure there isn't a their that should be a they're or dash 
that should be a comma. Then you're done copy editing.
Then you start fact checking, or you can do it the other way around if 
you've got both jobs, but in the old days, it was two different people.
So this putz film critic has declared that /The Godfather/ is the worst 
movie ever made. This, in your opinion, is not a fact, it is an opinion, 
an opinion that will go on forever as a representation of the magazine 
or newspaper paying your salary. Should you call the writer and maybe 
ask him to reconsider the statement, maybe add "one of" or "in my 
opinion," something other than a statement of fact that will making 
everyone at the paper a laughingstock. A statement of fact is a 
dangerous thing in the golden age of litigation, not to mention the 
potential of no more advertising dollars from a distribution company 
that bears a grudge.
As a fact checker, it is your job to question the veracity of absolutely 
everything, you're like a personal Wikipedia where everything has to be 
proven. This was a tough job before Wikipedia.
So as a fact checker, I say the bin Laden assassination story is full of 
holes. Not gaping, just little places where the pieces don't fit. It 
seems to me that if you don't believe in evolution because of a single 
missing link in a vast chain of empirical evidence, you can't believe 
the bin Laden story for the exact same reason. There are missing links.
So the first thing I "fact check" is the traditional Muslim method of 
burial, which mentions in the ground by sunset with the head pointed 
towards Mecca and nothing of having your picture taken then moved to the 
nearest ocean and being dumped off a U.S. destroyer.
As long as there was a way to bury bin Laden in the ground with his head 
towards Mecca, the burial at sea was distinctly NOT according to Muslim 
tradition. The obvious answer, the U.S. didn't want him buried, knowing 
the site would become an an attraction to the enemy, and ignoring the 
obvious, that surveillance of such a site would allow them to keep track 
of the enemy.
All it would have taken was one single country to allow the burial of 
bin Laden and there would have been no need for a burial at sea, 
according to Muslim tradition. You wanna tell me there wasn't single 
lunatic dictator in some backwoods African no-man's-land that wouldn't 
have taken bin Laden's body just for a tourist attraction? Did the U.S. 
actually ask every country if they wanted him? That would have been more 
in line with Muslim tradition than a burial at sea as long as his head 
was pointed towards Mecca.
Yet the media has blindly repeated Obama's line on this, it was 
according to Muslim tradition, when it was no such thing.
There. Now you know why I'm not working as a fact checker at any major 
news organization.
MD



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to