Iran has been isolated by the Arab spring
May 18, 2011
 by Admin

Nerves are fraying in Tehran as initial glee over *Arab
spring*<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/arab-and-middle-east-protests>
upheavals
turns to alarm. Iran welcomed the fall of its old enemy, Egypt’s Hosni
Mubarak. But the uprising now threatening its key Arab ally, the Syrian
regime of *Bashar Al-Assad*<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/bashar-al-assad>,
is a different matter altogether. Worse still, the thought that the region’s
revolutionary mood may inspire Iran’s own much-bludgeoned green opposition
to rise again inspires real fear.

Snap judgments in Washington and Jerusalem that Iran would be a main
beneficiary of the collapse of the old Arab order now look wide of the mark.
Infighting within the regime is matched by, and linked to, rising strategic
uncertainty abroad. For these and other reasons, such as the gathering
impact of nuclear-related sanctions, the era of cocky Iranian international
defiance may be drawing to a close.

Amid the Middle East maelstrom, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Supreme
Leader Ali Khamenei – Tehran’s terrible twins – suddenly look off balance,
vulnerable, and at odds.

Khamenei tried initially to hijack the Arab liberation movements in the name
of Iran’s illiberal theocratic brand, shamelessly sidestepping the brutal
suppression of Iran’s own democratic revolt in 2009. “*What I firmly
announce is that a new movement, with the grace of God, has started in the
region*<http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jG67zzodChPrO2HIoaDCTNzHFVIA?docId=CNG.a807bd69f3debaa7a6b4ca2383f9500b.271%3E>,”
he said in his Persian new year message in March. “This widespread awakening
of nations, which is directed towards Islamic goals, will definitely become
victorious.”

Significantly, Khamenei did not mention Syria. But as unrest there and
elsewhere has intensified, and as the essentially secular, wholly temporal,
democratic thrust of that unrest has become undeniable, he and other Iranian
leaders have largely abandoned the attempt to portray it as spreading
Khomeini-ist revolution. Instead they complain about Nato intervention in
Libya and a US-Israeli “plot” to topple Assad.

The stakes are undoubtedly high. Syria’s importance to Shia Iran as a prime
conduit to Hezbollah in Lebanon, as a base for Hamas leaders running Gaza,
as a frontline ally in the confrontation with Israel and the US, and as a
political and commercial pathway into the Arab world is hard to exaggerate.
But Tehran may reluctantly share western analysis that, regardless of
Assad’s fate, the political balance between the minority Alawi Shia regime
in Damascus and the Sunni majority has shifted irreversibly – to Iran’s
distinct disadvantage.

A flurry of recent statements indicated rising Iranian anxiety. Speaking in
Turkey, Ahmadinejad said there was “*no need for foreign
intervention*<http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110510/wl_mideast_afp/syriapoliticsunrestiran_20110510094604>”
in Syria, as if anybody was contemplating it. Foreign ministry spokesman
Ramin Mehmanparast accused western media of exaggerating the violence. And
an official statement urged government and protesters to compromise in the
interests of anti-Zionist solidarity.

“If Assad survives, he will have to establish some distance from Iran to
appease Sunni protesters,” *said American commentator David
Ignatius*<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/2011/03/04/AFXBunDF_blog.html>,
quoting US officials. “If he’s toppled, Syria is likely to be ruled by a
Sunni-dominated regime that will be more hostile to Iran.”

The negative implications for Iran of the Arab revolts do not stop with
Syria. The shotgun wedding between the *rival Palestinian factions Hamas and
Fatah*<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/04/palestinian-rivals-hamas-fatah-deal>,
after years of bitter estrangement, has been widely attributed to the Hamas
leadership’s new sense of insecurity in its habitual Syrian base. But it was
also the product of a new assertiveness by Egypt, whose summary disposal of
the slavishly pro-American Mubarak has begun to restore Cairo’s authority as
the leading Arab power and an honest broker of inter-Arab disputes.

An Egypt less in thrall to Washington, and more prepared to defy Israel (for
example, by permanently opening the Gaza crossings) could in theory benefit
Tehran. But a more democratic and politically stronger, independent Egypt
would also be a formidable rival and check on Tehran’s regional ambitions.
In an interview with the Washington Post, Egypt’s new foreign minister,
Nabil El-Araby, said Cairo had “turned a page with every country in the
world”. But he declined to say whether that really included Iran, too.

The revolts in Bahrain and Yemen, drawing in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf
states, have also brought into the open long-simmering tensions with Iran –
with King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa of Bahrain, for example, directly
accusing Tehran of plotting a coup. The confrontation galvanised the
normally passive Saudis into a rare show of force, in Bahrain, in defence of
their perceived interests. And in Lebanon, too, Iran’s ongoing “flagrant
intervention” was publicly denounced by the outgoing prime minister, Saad
Hariri. He vowed Tehran would not be allowed to use its ally, Hezbollah, to
turn Lebanon into an “Iranian protectorate”.

None of this has gone unnoticed in Washington and Jerusalem, where
policymakers (with the exception of Israeli prime minister Binyamin
Netanyahu) appear more relaxed about the Iranian “threat” than they have for
some time. “The Iranians are in trouble,” *wrote analyst Aluf Benn in
Haaretz*<http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/netanyahu-waited-too-long-to-strike-iran-1.360972>.
“It is best for Israel to remain quiet and not intervene, and to let the
internal processes in Tehran and Damascus do their work.”

The sudden outpouring of repressed hostility unleashed by the Arab spring
has punctured the illusion, cultivated by Iran, of harmonious relations with
the Arab world and has instead highlighted its isolation. More dangerously
for the warring Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, it may act as a catalyst reviving
Iran’s internal opposition as economic problems mount and political
factionalism intensifies ahead of next year’s parliamentary polls. At their
latest demonstration in February, broken up like all the others, Tehran
protesters hit on a slogan the terrible twins might do well to ponder:
“Whether Cairo or Tehran, death to tyrants!”

Source: *
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/17/iran-arab-spring*<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/17/iran-arab-spring>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to