Mike,

Your after him because Nader's after 'Pro Corporate Candidates' who make 
sure their investments make their constituents/campaign donors rich.

Not because he makes Corporate Campaign contributors or Politicians rich 
at the expense of those who voted for them.

Having stock investments is not pro corporate.

As I pointed out in my last post on this, Nader has been against all of 
the things that Clinton/Gore/Kerry/Obama were for.

redux:
Might as well note, the VA hospitals Gore was going to close, Bush
closed. The Medi Care cuts Gore was proposing, Bush implemented, the
give aways to the Big Pharma that Gore was supporting, Bush did.

Just for a tad of Information in case you might have missed it over the
last 3-4 decades, Nader is against Corporate Control of our Government
and Politicians giving away the Tax payers money to Corporations who are
always begging for more welfare and less taxes, which has to be paid for
by the middle class.

Try this. If your Pro Corporate Political Party, Promote it openly.

Your DLC who approves those who get the Democrat Party approval to run 
as their Representative are openly Pro International Corporate, though 
if you look closely neither them or the Republicans support Independent 
American Businessmen, the leaders of the D/R party voted to give rewards 
and tax breaks to the International sorts that hostilely took over 
American Business that didn't want to sell in the first place to the 
International Consortium of Businesses and Bankers. It was this that 
destroyed the Democrat Control of the House and Senate in the 1980's, 
and is once again doing it.

Doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results is 
insane..... so I'm going to assume it isn't insane waht the D and R 
party leadership does and jsut follow the money...... and OMG, those who 
contribute to their campaigns and support them in non sElection years, 
are thier sources of income.

makes perfect sense why Corporations and International bankers get 
welfare from our Government paid for by by those that pay taxes (not 
their top guys).

Scott

On 6/29/2011 1:53 AM, bigraccoon wrote:
>
> Nader was on CNBC monday, 6/27/11 discussing his stock investments. He 
> sounded very pro-corporate, why would he have hundreds of thousands if 
> not millions of his own money invested in numerous corporations & 
> mutual funds if it were otherwise.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Scott Peden <[email protected] <mailto:scotpeden%40cruzio.com>>
> Date: June 27, 2011 9:30:50 PM PDT
> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:laamn%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [LAAMN] Inside Nader's Stock Portfolio
>
> Mike,
>
> I think your almost 11 years late on sending this one out.
>
> For starters, it was attacking Gore for his Corporate STANCE, and Naders
> investment of his PERSONAL wealth.
>
> Two different things.
>
> Nader has an anti Corporate Control of government stance, which he and
> his supporters were attacking Gores PRO Corporate Stance.
>
> Might as well note, the VA hospitals Gore was going to close, Bush
> closed. The Medi Care cuts Gore was proposing, Bush implemented, the
> give aways to the Big Pharma that Gore was supporting, Bush did.
>
> Just for a tad of Information in case you might have missed it over the
> last 3-4 decades, Nader is against Corporate Control of our Government
> and Politicians giving away the Tax payers money to Corporations who are
> always begging for more welfare and less taxes, which has to be paid for
> by the middle class.
>
> Scott
>
> On 6/27/2011 10:23 AM, bigraccoon wrote:
> >
> >
> > Inside Nader's Stock Portfolio
> >
> > http://www.salon.com/news/politics/feature/2000/10/28/stocks/print.html
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to