Boy they'll avoid this with the same fever they went after our Social
Security, as 911 profited, still profits the MIC/Police
State/International Bankers like nothing else ever could, to find that
it was a false flag event would endanger everything they've worked for
over the last 50 years.
I can guarantee you that their first line of defense against the truth,
the Main Stream Media, will avoid this like the plague, or at the very
least issue personal attacks on those they use to use as their shining
examples of a Corporate Government state well run.
Scott
9-11 resolution is the way to save we just may be able to save our
country in a democratic way without shedding blood all over the world.
Please read the links that pertain to Ellsberg and Gravell...
Pentagon Papers Whistleblowers, Congressman Who Saved Headwaters
Forest, and 9/11 Commissioners Themselves Call for a New 9/11
Investigation
<http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/03/pentagon-papers-whistleblowers.html>
The two main players in releasing the Pentagon Papers were Daniel
Ellsberg and United States Senator Mike Gravel.
Senator Gravel is the person who read the Pentagon Papers into the
Congressional Record. This act made the papers public record, so that
they could not be censored by the government. He was the only member of
Congress courageous enough to do so.
Both Ellsberg and Gravel - like many other high-level former officials
<http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/09/anniversary-of-911.html> in the
government and intelligence services (including many well-known
whistleblowers <http://www.nswbc.org/membership_list.htm>) - support a
new 9/11 investigation. Ellsberg says <http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5260>
that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive
than the Pentagon Papers". (Here's some
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/7/31/760117/-Bombshell:-Bin-Laden-worked-for-US-till-9-11>
of what that whistleblower says.) He also said that the government is
ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11.
And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in
9/11 are credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about
what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much
involvement there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be
humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of those in office, and that
there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation
into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see this
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJhWhItqYCc> and this
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VirlkZq1pLY>).
Gravel is now backing a California ballot initiative for a new 9/11
investigation. The text of the initiative is below.
The initiative would actually help support the 9/11 Commission and
fulfill the desire of the 9/11 Commissioners. Specifically, the
Commission was severely underfunded:
* The government spent $175 million
<http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/15/nation/na-probe15>investigating
the //
<http://articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/15/nation/na-probe15>Challenger space
shuttle disaster.
* It spent $152 million
<http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-106137814.html> on the Columbia
disaster investigation.
* It spent $30 million
<http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/04/01/starr.costs/>
investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
* But the government only authorized $15 million
<http://www.9-11commission.gov/about/faq.htm> for the 9/11 Commission.
Moreover, many 9/11 Commissioners said they never completed the
investigation:
* 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton himself says "I don't believe
for a minute we got everything right", that the Commission was set
up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and
that the 9/11 debate should continue
<http://web.archive.org/web/20070108233707/http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.html>.
* Similarly, 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said "There are ample
reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we
outlined in our version . . . We didn't have access . . . ."
<http://salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/27/911_conspiracies/index4.html>
. He also says that he had long feared that the investigation
depended too heavily on the accounts of Al Qaeda detainees who were
physically coerced into talking, and that it might take "a permanent
9/11 commission" to end the remaining mysteries of September 11
<http://georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2009/03/911-commissioner-bob-kerrey-it-might.html>.
* And 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission,
stating: "One of these days we will have to get the full story
because the 9-11 issue is so important to America."
<http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/23/1546256>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
