JAI:  Selections.  Entire article (with thecomments belwo is posted) at 

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/marx-to-market-09142011.html ).



[Marxism] Bloomberg: Marx is Right
johnaimani johnaimani at earthlink.net 
Tue Oct 18 12:18:27 MDT 2011 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

September 14, 2011, 11:07 PM EDT

 

 

"Marx to Market" (selected quotes from the article)

 

Instability

"One of Marx's most important contentions was that capitalism was 

inherently unstable. One only has to look at the headlines out of 

Europe---which is haunted by the specter of a possible Greek default, a 

banking disaster, and the collapse of the single-currency euro zone---to 

see that he was right. Marx diagnosed capitalism's instability at a time 

when his contemporaries and predecessors, such as Adam Smith and John 

Stuart Mill, were mostly enthralled by its ability to serve human wants."

 

Reserve Army of Labor

"Marx predicted that companies would need fewer workers as they improved 

productivity, creating an "industrial reserve army" of the unemployed 

whose existence would keep downward pressure on wages for the employed. 

It's hard to argue with that these days, given that the U.S. 

unemployment rate is still more than 9 percent. On Sept. 13 the U.S. 

Census Bureau released data showing that median income fell from 1973 

through 2010 for full-time, year-round male workers aged 15 and up, 

adjusted for inflation. The condition of blue-collar workers in the U.S. 

is still a far cry from the subsistence wage and "accumulation of 

misery" that Marx conjured. But it's not morning in America, either."

 

JB Say's 'Law'

"Marx loved to bash French economist Jean-Baptiste Say, who argued that 

general gluts cannot exist because the market will always match supply 

and demand. Marx argued that overproduction was in fact endemic to 

capitalism because the proletariat isn't paid enough to buy the stuff 

that the capitalists produce. Again, that theory has lately been hard to 

dispute. The only way blue-collar Americans managed to maintain 

consumption in the last decade was by overborrowing. When the housing 

market collapsed, many were left with crippling debt."

 

Bourgeois kow-tows

"Marx has gotten an attentive reading recently from the likes of New 

York University economist Nouriel Roubini and George Magnus, the 

London-based senior economic adviser to UBS Investment Bank. Magnus's 

employer, Switzerland-based UBS, is a pillar of the financial 

establishment, with offices in more than 50 countries and over 

$2 trillion in assets. Yet in an Aug. 28 essay for Bloomberg View, 

Magnus wrote that "today's global economy bears some uncanny 

resemblances" to what Marx foresaw."

 

(JAI:  Where the article is incorrect is in its proposition that:)



"What Marx and his acolytes underappreciated was capitalism's power to heal 
itself. It may have been his fatal intellectual mistake."



(JAI: Many times Marx remarked (esp Vol 3m Chap XV, Sec 3 "Excess Capital, 
Excess Population) upon the benefits of crisis to capitalism (and more so to 
the larger capitals) of the destruction of--in the main--lesser capitals by 
enabling these survivors to pick at the bones (read: stripping assets, gaining 
market share, etc) of fallen competitors.  E.g.:

 

"...the fall in prices and the competitive struggle would have driven every 
capitalist to lower the individual value of his total product below its general 
value by means of new machines, new and improved working methods, new 
combinations, i.e., to increase the productivity of a given quantity of labour, 
to lower the proportion of variable to constant capital, and thereby to release 
some labourers; in short, to create an artificial over-population. Ultimately, 
the depreciation of the elements of constant capital would itself tend to raise 
the rate of profit. The mass of employed constant capital would have increased 
in relation to variable, but its value could have fallen. The ensuing 
stagnation of production would have prepared - within capitalistic limits - a 
subsequent expansion of production.

http://marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1894-c3/ch15.htm

    

(JAI:  And Henryk Grossmann to no end pointed to the same things more than once 
in his "Law of the Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System".  E.g.)



"We know that in Marx's conception crises are simply a healing process of the 
system, a form in which equilibrium is again re-established, even if forcibly 
and with huge losses. From the standpoint of capital every crisis is a 'crisis 
of purification'. Soon the accumulation process picks up again, on an expanded 
basis, and within certain limits.it can proceed without any disruption of 
equilibrium. But 'beyond certain limits', from point r2on, the accumulated 
capital again grows too large. The mass of surplus value starts to decline, 
valorisation begins to slacken until finally.it evaporates completely in the 
way described earlier. The breakdown sets in again and is followed by 
devaluation of capital.and so on."



(JAI: No.  Marx (and Grossmann) knew as we Marxists know that capitalism is at 
once as much a self-stinging scorpion as it is a blood-sucking vampier bat.  
Self-inflicted stings yield a carcass that from the rot of its own stinking 
flesh (crises) rises again and again a funky Sisypheian Phoenix (pun intended 
as regards Arpaioville) of an economy that takes wing (expansion) only to 
flounder, crash and burn (higher level of crises) taking down with it not only 
its own weaker members but the mass of completely totally innocent working 
class.



But isn't it now seeing its last resurrection?)

 

JAI

RAC-LA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to