http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/11/21/about-pepper-spray/
About Pepper Spray<http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/11/21/about-pepper-spray/> By Deborah Blum <javascript:void(0)> | November 21, 2011 | [image: Comments]18<http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2011/11/21/about-pepper-spray/#respond> [image: Share]Share <javascript:void(0)> [image: Share]Email<javascript:void(0)> ------------------------------ <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/files/2011/11/chilitemp-213x300.jpg>One hundred years ago, an American pharmacist named Wilbur Scoville developed a scale <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoville_scale> to measure the intensity of a peppers burn. The scale as you can see on the widely used chart to the left puts sweet bell peppers at the zero mark and the blistering habanero at up to 350,000 Scoville Units. I checked the Scoville Scale for something else yesterday. I was looking for a way to measure the intensity of pepper spray, the kind that police have been using on Occupy protestors including this weeks shocking incident <http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/pepper-spray-brutality-at-uc-davis/248764/>involving peacefully protesting students at the University of California-Davis. As the chart makes clear, commercial grade pepper spray leaves even the most painful of natural peppers (the Himalayan ghost pepper)<http://www.thehottestpepper.com/ghost-chili-pepper-fun-facts.html>far behind. Its listed at between 2 million and 5.3 million Scoville units. The lower number refers to the kind of pepper spray that you and I might be able to purchase for self-protective uses. And the higher number? Its the kind of spray that police use, the super-high dose given in the orange-colored spray used at UC-Davis. The reason pepper-spray ends up on the Scoville chart is that you probably guessed this - its literally derived from pepper chemistry, the compounds that make habaneros so much more formidable than the comparatively wimpy bells. Those compounds are called capsaicins and in fact pepper spray is more formally called Oleoresin Capsicum or OC Spray<http://www.chemistrydaily.com/chemistry/OC_spray> . <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/files/2011/11/article-2063706-0EDE282A00000578-562_634x4121-300x194.jpg> Photo courtesy: California Aggie But weve taken to calling it pepper spray, I think, because that makes it sound so much more benign than it really is, like something just a grade or so above what we might mix up in a home kitchen. The description hints maybe at that eye-stinging effect that the cook occasionally experiences when making something like a jalapeno-based salsa, a little burn, nothing too serious. Until you look it up on the Scoville scale and remember, as toxicologists love to point out, that the dose makes the poison. That were not talking about cookery but a potent blast of chemistry. So that if OC spray is the U.S. police response of choice and certainly, its been used with dismaying enthusiasm during the Occupy protests nationwide, as documented in this excellent Atlantic roundup <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/too-much-violence-and-pepper-spray-at-the-ows-protests/248761/>- it may be time to demand a more serious look at the risks involved. My own purpose here is to focus on the dangers of a high level of capsaicin exposure. But as pointed out in the 2004 paper, Health Hazards of Pepper Spray<http://web.archive.org/web/20000817004624/http:/www.ncmedicaljournal.com/Smith-OK.htm>, written by health researchers at the University of North Carolina and Duke University, the sprays contain other risky materials: *Depending on brand, an OC spray may contain water, alcohols, or organic solvents as liquid carriers; and nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or halogenated hydrocarbons (such as Freon, tetrachloroethylene, and methylene chloride) as propellants to discharge the canister contents.(3) Inhalation of high doses of some of these chemicals can produce adverse cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic effects, including arrhythmias and sudden death.* Their paper focuses mostly, though, on the dangerous associated with pepper-based compounds. In 1997, for instance, researchers at the University of California-San Francisco discovered <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07493.x/abstract;jsessionid=F90921C99C157E866F49755142E03B40.d03t01>that the hot sensation of habaneros and their ilk was caused by capsaicin binding directly to proteins in the membranes of pain and heat sensing neurons. Capsaicins can activate these neurons at below body temperature, leading to a startling sensation of heat. Repeated exposure can wear the system down, depleting neurotransmitters, reducing the sensation of the pain. This knowledg <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capsaicin>e has led to a number of medical treatments using capsaicins to manage pain. Its very mechanism, though, should remind us to be wary. As the North Carolina researchers point out, any compound that can influence nerve function is, by definition, risky. Research tells us that pepper spray acts as a potent inflammatory agent. It amplifies allergic sensitivities, it irritates and damages eyes, membranes, bronchial airways, the stomach lining basically what it touches. It works by causing pain and, as we know, pain is the body warning us of an injury. In general, these are short term effects. Pepper spray, for instance, induces a burning sensation in the eyes in part by damaging cells in the outer layer of the cornea. Usually, the body repairs this kind of injury fairly neatly. But with repeated exposures, studies find, there can be permanent damage to the cornea <http://www.iovs.org/content/41/8/2138.full>. The more worrisome effects have to do with inhalation<http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/188069.pdfwww.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/188069.pdf> and by some reports, California university police officers deliberately<http://www.americablog.com/2011/11/us-torture-policy-comes-homeuc-davis.html>put OC spray down protestors throats. Capsaicins inflame the airways, causing swelling and restriction. And this means that pepper sprays pose a genuine risk to people with asthma and other respiratory conditions. And by genuine risk, I mean a known risk, a no-surprise any police department should know this risk, easy enough to find in the scientific literature. To cite just three examples here: 1) Pepper Spray Induced Respiratory Failure<http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/98/5/961.short>Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation 2) Assessing the incapacitative effects <http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=872268&show=abstract>of pepper spray during resistive encounters with the police. 3) The Human Health Effects <http://jcx.sagepub.com/content/4/1/73.short>of Pepper Spray. That second paper is from a law enforcement journal. And the summary for that last paper notes*: Studies of the effects of capsaicin on human physiology, anecdotal experience with field use of pepper spray, and controlled exposure of correctional officers in training have shown adverse effects on the lungs, larynx, middle airway, protective reflexes, and skin. Behavioral and mental health effects also may occur if pepper spray is used abusively.* Pepper spray use has been suspected of contributing to a number of deaths that occurred in police custody. In mid-1990s, the U.S. Department of Justice cited nearly 70 fatalities linked to pepper-spray use, following on a 1995 report compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union of California. The ACLU report cited 26 suspicious deaths; its important to note that most involved pre-existing conditions such as asthma. But its also important to note a troubling pattern. In fact, in 1999, the ACLU asked the California appeals court to declare the use of pepper spray to be dangerous and cruel. That request <http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/aclu-urges-ca-appeals-court-declar>followed an action by northern California police officers against environmental protestors the police were accused of dipping Q-tips into OC spray and applying them directly to the eyes of men and women engaged in an anti-logging protest. The ACLU believes that the use of pepper spray as a kind of chemical cattle prod on nonviolent demonstrators resisting arrest constitutes excessive force and violates the Constitution, wrote association attorneys some 13 years ago. Yesterday, the University of California-Davis announced that it was suspending <http://www.davisenterprise.com/local-news/crime-fire-courts/protests-again-gathering-steam-on-campus/>two of the police officers who pepper-sprayed protesting students. Eleven of those students were treated by paramedics on scene and two were sent to a hospital in Sacramento for more intensive treatment. Undoubtedly, these injuries will factor into another scientific study of pepper spray, another acknowledgement that top of the Scoville scale is dangerous territory. But my own preference is that we start learning from these mistakes without waiting another 13 years or more, without engaging in yet another cycle of abuse and injury. Now would be good. *Cross-posted from Speakeasy Science<http://blogs.plos.org/speakeasyscience/2011/11/20/about-pepper-spray/> .*** [image: Deborah Blum]*About the Author:* Deborah Blum is a Pulitzer-Prize winning science writer and the best-selling author of The Poisoners Handbook: Murder and the Birth of Forensic Medicine in Jazz Age New York. A professor of science journalism at the University of Wisconsin, she blogs about chemistry culture at Speakeasy Science<http://blogs.plos.org/speakeasyscience>. Follow on Twitter @deborahblum <http://twitter.com/deborahblum>. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
