http://www.marxist.com/egypt-the-masses-rise-against-the-army-generals.htm

 Egypt – masses rise against the army
generals<http://www.marxist.com/egypt-the-masses-rise-against-the-army-generals.htm>

Written by Brian Adams Wednesday, 23 November 2011 11:28

<http://www.marxist.com/egypt-the-masses-rise-against-the-army-generals/print.htm><http://www.marxist.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXJ4aXN0LmNvbS9lZ3lwdC10aGUtbWFzc2VzLXJpc2UtYWdhaW5zdC10aGUtYXJteS1nZW5lcmFscy5odG0%3D/tmpl,component/>

[image: Tahrir square during the "Million man march"]*Events in Egypt are
developing at lightning speed. Similarly to the last days of Mubarak in
February this year, we see daily battles on the streets of Cairo and
elsewhere. The Egyptian masses are determined to see the revolution carried
through to the end. The clash between revolution and counter-revolution is
provoking a crisis inside all political forces, as the rank and file
instinctively move towards revolution and the leaderships vacillate and try
to hold the masses back.*

[image: Tahrir square during the "Million man march"]The latest protests,
which are now entering their fifth day, are the largest and longest since
the beginning of the revolution and the fall of Mubarak. According to Ahram
online, the “million-man march” on Tuesday 22nd November succeeded in
mobilising a million people in Tahrir Square, and 100,000 in Alexandria. In
addition, there were protests of many thousands in Suez, Port Said,
Gharbiya, Fayoum, Damietta, and Minya. Such numbers are all the more
impressive given the brutality that protestors are facing from the state.
The streets around Tahrir Square have become open battlegrounds, with
police firing round upon round of tear gas and rubber-coated metal bullets
at the crowds and protestors defending themselves with stones and Molotov
cocktails.

The violence and brutality on display by the state forces – the armed
bodies of men – cannot be overstated. Dozens have been killed and thousands
injured. Reports (
http://english.ahram.org.eg/~/NewsContent/1/64/27284/Egypt/Politics-/Fighting-intensifies-around-Tahrir-Square-as-thous.aspx)
indicate that the Central Security Forces are using a new potent type of
tear gas that causes extreme suffocation and epileptic shocks. In Qena, the
firing of tear gas into apartment blocks has left a nine-month old baby
girl dead. Elsewhere, tear gas has been fired into hospitals and even
mosques.

This brutality, instead of scaring protestors away and diminishing the
crowds, has simply served to enrage the masses even further, leading to a
swelling of the numbers on the streets. The revolutionary masses –
primarily lead by the youth, who have been the most determined fighters
since the beginning of the 25th January movement – have lost all fear. As
is so often the case, the whip of counter-revolution has merely propelled
the revolution further forwards.
“Leave, leave”

As we reported previously (
http://www.marxist.com/egypt-revolution-moving-into-a-new-phase.htm), these
latest protests are directed against the military regime – the Supreme
Council of Armed Forces (SCAF) – which filled the power vacuum left after
the departure of Hosni Mubarak on 11th February, and which has refused to
leave ever since, despite repeated calls and protestors on behalf of the
masses.

The current protest, which began with a demonstration in Tahrir Square last
Friday, was organised by an array of the different political groupings that
put down their banners in order to unite against the electoral and
constitutional process that the SCAF have put in place. The parliamentary
elections scheduled for the 28th November are rightly considered to be a
sham, with the SCAF suggesting that it remain as a super-constitutional
body after the elections, and with presidential elections not scheduled
(originally) until late 2012 or early 2013.

In response to the protests, Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, head of
the SCAF, gave a public statement in which he announced the resignation of
the Cabinet and the moving forward of presidential elections to June 2012
(at the latest). Such concessions, however, like the meagre reforms offered
by Ben-Ali, Mubarak, and Gaddafi in their final days, are too little, too
late for the revolutionary masses in Tahrir Square, who were quick to
reject Tantawi’s offers. The crowds responded to the Field Marshal’s calls
for protestors to disperse with defiant chants of “leave, leave; Tantawi
must leave”.

Events are moving forward quickly; the confidence of the masses is growing
and consciousness is rising; the SCAF is unable to keep up with the
situation. The similarity to events in February earlier this year is clear,
with the ruling elite, detached from the real situation and mood on the
streets, trying to maintain power at all costs. Like the dying days of
Hosni Mubarak, we see appeals from the SCAF for calm and order accompanied
simultaneously by the deployment of state violence. Indeed, within two
hours of Tantawi’s speech, security forces had already returned and the
street battles had recommenced.

The Egyptian news website Al Masry Al Youm comments (
http://www.almasryalyoum.com/en/node/517625) on the similarity between the
February days and the current situation:

“Shortly after he finished his speech, thousands of protesters in Tahrir
chanted slogans reminiscent of those used during the protests that brought
down President Hosni Mubarak.

‘Leave, leave,’ they told Tantawi.

The growing similarities between these protests and unrest early this year
are not limited to slogans. Political activist and analyst Samer Soliman
compared Tantawi’s speech to the ones Mubarak made early in the revolution,
saying it came too late and offered solutions that were no longer
acceptable after the recent escalation.

‘It’s obvious that time has passed him by, and he doesn’t realize what’s
happening around him, just like Mubarak’ Soliman said.

Islam Lotfy, member of the 25 January Revolution Youth Coalition and
co-founder of the Egyptian Current party said protesters in the square
immediately rejected Tantawi’s ‘disappointing’ speech.

Activist Ahmed Maher, coordinator of 6 April Youth Movement, agreed with
Zahran, saying, ‘the speech doesn’t respond to the demands raised by
protesters in Tahrir and other governorates. The speech is the same as the
speeches of Mubarak in his final days.’”

Both the tone and the content of Tantawi’s speech was similar to those of
Mubarak’s, with conciliatory appeals to the crowds for order and calm.
Tantawi’s speech suggested that he may have been living on another planet
for the past ten months, with proclamations that the SCAF represented the
will of the Egyptian people and was protecting the “national interest”, has
never shot bullets at any Egyptian citizen, and has been patient with
“attempts to smear the reputation” of the SCAF. It beggars belief to think
that anyone is expected to buy such hypocritical nonsense that is spouted
forth simultaneously alongside brutal state repression on the streets.

But neither violence nor concessions, similarly to the last days of
Mubarak, will be enough to keep the SCAF in power. The military regime’s
days are numbered, and it is increasingly looking like a case of not
*if*the SCAF will
*choose* to leave, but *when* it will be *forced* to leave.
Defections and divisions

There are further similarities between the beginning of the revolution and
current events, with the defection of certain high-ranking state officials
to the side of the protestors. Ahmed Shoman, a popular army captain who was
amongst the first of the army officials to defect to the revolution in
January, has once again joined the masses in Tahrir Square, condemning the
SCAF for attempting to stay in power and telling reporters that the army
“should never be above the people”. Shoman is seen to represent the more
revolutionary elements within the army, and such a defection indicates the
potential for greater splits in the state apparatus.

Alongside defections in the military, there are also divisions forming in
the Muslim Brotherhood. Since the beginning of the revolution, the Muslim
Brotherhood has kept at arms’ length from the revolutionary movement,
refusing to attend a number of protests and tail-ending the movement when
it has been involved. Instead, the Brotherhood has concentrated on gaining
electoral success in the upcoming parliamentary elections, which it is
widely expected to dominate due to its large national organisational
network, which, unlike other political groups, pre-dates the revolution.

Now divisions are beginning to occur within the Muslim Brotherhood between
the old, elitist, opportunist leadership and the younger members, who, like
the rest of the Egyptian youth, are the most revolutionary layer of the
movement. The Brotherhood leadership, which is more concerned with its own
interests than that of the revolution, and which is scared of the size of
the latest protests, has advised its members to avoid the demonstrations.
This has led to the resignation of many younger members from the
Brotherhood.

What this highlights is that the old (and new) political divisions in Egypt
are breaking down and polarising into two camps: revolutionaries and
counter-revolutionaries. What is also clear is the complete absence of any
mass organisation that is able to represent the desires and needs of these
revolutionary youth. It is this lack of leadership – the missing subjective
factor – that is one of the most striking features of the Egyptian
revolution and that is, in the final analysis, the main barrier standing
between the Egyptian masses and the potential of taking power.

In the February days, it was the impact of the workers on the revolution,
through a wave of mass strikes, that ultimately led to the toppling of
Mubarak. Indeed, this September was characterised by a further wave of
strikes throughout the country (
http://www.marxist.com/egyptian-working-class-organising-and-on-the-move.htm).
The latest protests have seen the youth at the forefront, as was the case
in the first wave of revolution. This will inevitably be followed by
movements of the working class. Already workers from Suez and other parts
of the country have called for an indefinite general strike, but because of
the lack of organisation on a national scale, this is yet to materialise.

What is needed now is for the Federation of Independent Trade Unions, which
has been newly formed since February, to mobilise all its forces, not
simply by joining in the protests in Tahrir Square, but by calling for a
general strike. Such a move would hold a fire to the backsides of the SCAF
and ensure a speedy departure of the military regime.
Nature abhors a vacuum

*The important question regarding the possible fall of the SCAF is: who
would fill the void? As is often said, nature abhors a vacuum, and this is
even more the case in politics. Regarding the most commonly cited
possibilities, the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood have consistently
revealed themselves to be against the revolution, and it is clear that a
liberal bourgeois government, perhaps with a presidential figure such as
Mohamed El Baradei, would be able to solve none of the social and economic
issues that have been posed by workers and youth throughout the revolution.
One must not forget that the demand for “social justice” has been
consistently made since the beginning of the movement; despite some
suggestions, the Egyptian revolution is clearly about more than just
establishing a democratic civilian government.*

Any new government will, in the end, be faced with the task of solving the
problems facing the Egyptian people; the task of providing jobs, increasing
wages, and improving public services. But none of these issues can be
solved on a capitalist basis. Despite consistent economic growth in Egypt,
inequality has grown; youth unemployment, like the rest of the Arab world,
is extremely high, with official estimates (which are very likely to be
underestimates) of around 25%; inflation is biting into already pitiful
wages.

The tasks facing Egyptian workers and youth, therefore, is to take power
into their own hands – both politically and economically – and not to place
their trust in any of the fair weather friends of the revolution. Once
again, this raising the question of the need for the independent trade
unions and the labour movement as a whole to assert itself, and for the
need to build a revolutionary organisation in Egypt that can unite the
various struggles and lead the movement forward – forward to socialism.
Home <http://www.marxist.com/> » Africa <http://www.marxist.com/africa/> »
Egypt <http://www.marxist.com/egypt/>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to