http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/how_the_99_won_in_the_fight_for_worker_r ights_20111126/ Chalk One Up for the 99%
By <http://www.tomdispatch.com/authors/andykroll> Andy Kroll Truthdig: November 26, 2011 This article was originally published by <http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175470/tomgram%3A_andy_kroll%2C_occupy_wall _street%27s_political_victory_in_ohio/#more> TomDispatch. No headlines announced it. No TV pundits called it. But on the evening of November 8th, Occupy Wall Street, the populist uprising built on economic justice and corruption-free politics that's spread like a lit match hitting a trail of gasoline, notched its first major political victory, and in the unlikeliest of places: Ohio. You might have missed OWS's win amid the recent wave of Occupy crackdowns. Police raided <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YdfsmvvkrW4> Occupy Denver, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rWeGQ1zCdVU> Occupy Salt Lake City, <http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qFFLO2fHCyk> Occupy Oakland, <http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/11/protesters_march_throu gh_downt.html> Occupy Portland, and <http://www.guardiannews.com/world/blog/2011/nov/16/occupy-wall-street-live- protesters-eviction#block-3> Occupy Seattle in a <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/nov/15/occupy-movement-police-cra ckdowns?CMP=twt_fd> five-day span. Hundreds were arrested. And then, in the early morning hours on Tuesday, New York City police descended on Occupy Wall Street itself, <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/11/15/nyregion/20111115_Zuccotti_Go Big.html?ref=nyregion#10> fists flying and <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/11/15/nyregion/20111115_Zuccotti_Go Big.html?ref=nyregion#3> riot shields at the ready, with orders from Mayor Michael Bloomberg to evict the protesters. Later that day, a judge ruled that they couldn't rebuild their young community, dealing a blow to the Occupy protest that inspired them all. Instead of simply condemning the eviction, many pundits and columnists <http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/11/15/368459/getting-kicked-out-of-z uccotti-park-is-probably-good-for-ows/> praised it or highlighted what they considered its bright side. The Washington Post's Ezra Klein <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/did-bloomberg-do-occupy -wall-street-a-favor/2011/08/25/gIQAvQURON_blog.html> wrote that Bloomberg had done Occupy Wall Street a favor. After all, he argued, something dangerous or deadly was bound to happen at OWS sooner or later, especially with winter soon to arrive. Zuccotti Park, Klein added, "was cleared. in a way that will temporarily reinvigorate the protesters and give Occupy Wall Street the best possible chance to become whatever it will become next." The New York Times' Paul Krugman <http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/zuccotti/> wrote that OWS "should be grateful" for Bloomberg's <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/15/michael-bloomberg-statement-zuc cotti-park?intcmp=239> eviction decree: "By acting so badly, Bloomberg has made it easy to see who won't be truthful and can't handle open discourse. He's also saved OWS from what was probably its greatest problem, the prospect that it would just fade away as time went on and the days grew colder." Mentions of the phrase "income inequality" in print publications, web stories, and broadcast transcripts <http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1111/Occupy_Wall_Street_is_winning.h tml> spiked from 91 times a week in early September to nearly 500 in late October, according to the website Politico-an increase of nearly 450%. In the second week of October, according to ThinkProgress, the <http://october2011.org/blogs/kevin-zeese/occupy-movement-has-changed-debate > words most uttered on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News were "jobs" (2,738), "Wall Street" (2,387), and "Occupy" (1,278). (References to "debt" tumbled to 398.) And here's another sign of the way Occupy Wall Street has forced what it considers the most pressing economic issues for the country into the spotlight: conservatives have lately gone on the defensive by attacking the very existence of income inequality, even if to <http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/aeis_myth_of_equality.php> little effect. As AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/richard-trumka/ohio-labor-law_b_1096986.html> put it, "Give credit to the Occupy Wall Street movement (and historic inequality) for redefining the political narrative." Wall Street in Ohio The way Occupy Wall Street, with next to no direct access to the mainstream media, commandeered the national political narrative represents something of a stunning triumph. It also laid the Read between the lines and what Klein, Krugman, and others are really saying is: you had your occupation; now, get real. Start organizing, meaningfully connect your many Occupy protests, build a real movement. As these columnists see it, that movement-whether you call it <http://www.salon.com/2011/10/31/occupy_usa_100_arrests_nationwide/> OccupyUSA, <http://wearethe99percent.tumblr.com/> We Are the 99%, or the <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/13/opinion/sunday/the-new-progressive-moveme nt.html?_r=1> New Progressive Movement-should now turn its attention to policy changes like a millionaire's tax, a financial transaction fee, or a constitutional amendment to nullify the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision that loosed a torrent of cash into American elections. It should think about supporting political candidates. It should start making a nuts-and-bolts difference in American politics. But such assessments miss an important truth: Occupy Wall Street has already won its first victory its own way-in Ohio, when voters repealed <http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2011/03/whats_really_in_senate_5_cl ear.html> Republican governor John Kasich's law to slash bargaining rights for 350,000 public workers and gut what remained of organized labor's political power. Commandeering the Conversation Don't believe me? Then think back to this spring and summer, when Occupy Wall Street was just a glimmer in the imagination of <http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-international-or igins> a few activists, artists, and students. In Washington, the conversation, such as it was, concerned debt, deficit, and austerity. The discussion wasn't about whether to slash spending, only about how much and how soon. The Washington Post's Greg Sargent called it the <http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/here-it-is-scientific-pr oof-of-the-beltway-deficit-feedback-loop/2011/03/03/AFTo4s5G_blog.html> "Beltway Deficit Feedback Loop"-and boy was he right. A National Journal <http://www.nationaljournal.com/economy/in-media-coverage-deficit-eclipses-u nemployment-20110516> analysis in May found that the number of news articles in major newspapers mentioning "deficit" was climbing, while mentions of "unemployment" had plummeted. In the last week of July, the liberal blog ThinkProgress <http://october2011.org/blogs/kevin-zeese/occupy-movement-has-changed-debate > tallied 7,583 mentions of the word "debt" on MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News alone. "Unemployment"? A measly 427. This all-deficit, all-the-time debate shaped the <http://articles.cnn.com/2011-08-02/politics/debt.talks_1_debt-ceiling-credi t-rating-spending-cuts?_s=PM:POLITICS> final debt-ceiling deal, in which House Speaker John Boehner and his <http://majorityleader.gov/newsroom/2011/01/leader-cantor-defines-cut-and-gr ow-congress-previews-state-of-the-union-on-meet-the-press.html> "cut-and-grow"-loving GOP allies got just about everything they wanted. So lopsided was the debate in Washington that President Obama himself hailed the deal's <http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/08/united-states-of-austerity> bone-deep cuts to health research, public education, environmental protection, childcare, and infrastructure. These cuts, the president <http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/07/31/president-obama-speaks-support-bi partisan-deal-reduce-deficit-and-raise-debt-limit> explained, would bring the country to "the lowest level of annual domestic spending since Dwight Eisenhower was president." After studying the deal, Ethan Pollock of the Economic Policy Institute <http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/08/united-states-of-austerity> told me, "There's no way to square this plan with the president's 'Winning the Future' agenda. That agenda ends." Yet Obama said this as if it were a good thing. Six weeks after Obama's speech, protesters heard <http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/occupywallstreet.html> the call of <http://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/occupywallstreet> Adbusters, the Canadian anti-capitalist magazine, and <http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-international-or igins?page=1> followed the lead of a small crew of activists, writers, and students to "occupy Wall Street." A few hundred of them set up camp in Zuccotti Park, a small patch of concrete next door to Ground Zero. No one knew how long the occupation would last, or what its impact would be. What a game-changing few months it's been. Occupy Wall Street <http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/oct/17/occupy-protests-world-l ist-map> has inspired 750 events around the world, and hundreds of (semi-)permanent encampments around the United States. In so doing, the protests have wrestled the national discussion on the economy away from austerity and toward gaping income inequality ( <http://www.flickr.com/photos/kapkap/6189131120/sizes/m/in/photostream/> the 99% versus 1% theme), outsized executive compensation, and the plain buying and selling of American politicians by lobbyists and campaign donors. For more, go to the URL: <http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/how_the_99_won_in_the_fight_for_worker _rights_20111126/> http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/how_the_99_won_in_the_fight_for_worker_ rights_20111126/ Andy Kroll is a <http://motherjones.com/authors/andy-kroll> reporter in the Washington bureau of Mother Jones magazine and an <http://www.tomdispatch.com/authors/andykroll> associate editor at TomDispatch. He has appeared on MSNBC, Al-Jazeera English, Democracy Now!, and Current TV's "Countdown" with Keith Olbermann. His email is akroll(at)motherjones.com. To catch Timothy MacBain's latest Tomcast audio interview in which Kroll discusses Occupy Wall Street's unlikely first political victory, click <http://tomdispatch.blogspot.com/2011/11/political-victory-for-ows.html> here, or download it to your iPod <http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/tomcast-from-tomdispatch-com/id357095817 > here. * * * Dear Friends, Neighbors, and Relatives: This Wednesday, November 30th, I am hosting a fundraiser for Torie Osborn candidate for State Assembly district 50 which includes Hollywood, West Hollywood and areas west to Santa Monica and Malibu. This is an open seat with a strong Democratic base so the primary election decides the winner. I am supporting Torie because she is the kind of leader that will make a difference for Hollywood - and all of Los Angeles. Torie is endorsed by Eric Garcetti, Tom LaBonge and Mayor Villaraigosa and me, all of whom know she is the kind of leader that will make a positive difference for Hollywood. Please make a generous donation to her campaign and please COME to Torie's Autumn Reception in Hollywood this Wednesday. November 30, Music Box Theater from 6:30 to 8:30 PM. Love to all, Jackie and Sharon (please see flyer below) The maximum contribution is $3,900 Donations can be made on line at https://secure.actblue.com/page/autumnreception invite_30.jpg No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2101/4645 - Release Date: 11/28/11 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
