From: Marcy Winograd

LA Fights to End Corporate Personhood

By LA Progressive

  <http://readersupportednews.org/images/stories/alphabet/rsn-T.jpg> he Los 
Angeles City Council will vote on a resolution, which calls on Congress to 
amend the Constitution to clearly establish that only living persons - not 
corporations - are endowed with constitutional rights, and that money is not 
the same as free speech in the electoral process. If the resolution is passed, 
Los Angeles will be the first major city in the U.S. to call for an end to all 
Corporate Constitutional rights. The vote will be held at 10 AM on Tuesday, 
December 6, 2011 at Los Angeles City Hall 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, 
CA 90012-3224. Citizens are urged to attend the meeting and to contact their 
City Council Member in support of this initiative. A full draft of the 
resolution  <http://movetoamendla.org/> is available on the website.

Our goal is to have a unanimous vote by the City Council," said Mary Beth 
Fielder, Co-Chair of Move To Amend LA, the grassroots organization spearheading 
this effort. "We are experiencing overwhelming support for what may be a 
historic turning point in restoring a voice to the voters and setting an 
example for the rest of the country."

Move to Amend L.A.'s effort is endorsed by a growing list of organizations 
including Common Cause, Occupy LA, Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, 
Physicians for Social Responsibility, Environmental Caucus of the CA Democratic 
Party, Occupy Venice, Southern California Americans for Democratic Action, 
MoveOn LA, Progressive Democrats of the Santa Monica Mountains, Multiple 
Neighborhood Councils, Democracy for America, Women's International League for 
Peace and Freedom, Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, Good Jobs LA, AFSCME 
36, LA Green Machine, LA Progressive, and the California Clean Money Campaign.

* * *

 From: Jimmy Walter [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 6:18 AM

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/12/us-highhandedness/


US highhandedness

15 hrs ago 
NATO’s brutal and unprovoked attack on Pakistani posts at Mohmand on 26 Nov 
killed and injured many soldiers and has put the whole nation into grief, shock 
and of course anger. The statement of Gen Dempsey that “the attack wasn’t 
deliberate and what in the world would we gain by attacking a Pakistani border 
post” can’t be used as defence for the cold-blooded murder. A mistake is for a 
minute and not for hours.

Two hours continuous bombing and killing the soldiers, despite clear knowledge 
of the posts and hearing Pakistani voices on the wireless, are proof that the 
Americans are lying. What did Raymond Davis gain by killing two Pakistanis; 
what did the Americans gain by killing thousands of innocent people in Iraq and 
Afghanistan and through drone attacks in Pakistan? It is time they answered 
“what we would’ve gained?” It seems that world has been hijacked by the 
Americans due to its status as the sole superpower and military might.

The other so called superpowers, except China perhaps, also dovetail their 
agendas with the US’ due to economic, social, religious and some other reasons. 
Now, the big question is, how long the rule of “might is right” will prevail.

Destroying Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya (and now they are hovering over Iran) are 
but a few examples of American high-handedness. The American leaders have 
always told lies to their nation and the world for their misadventures. Bush 
and Collin Powell destroyed Iraq on the pretext of Weapons of Mass Destruction; 
Afghanistan has become the country of widows, orphans, and graveyards and they 
have given a free hand to Israel to invade and destroy any Muslim country, 
besides continuous genocide of Palestinians and Kashmiris.

Now, they are killing their own allies, who have suffered the most in the war, 
who have sheltered more than 6 million Afghan refugees, and who have been 
plunging deep into poverty due to hefty economic losses. The world needs to 
take note of American aggression and exert whatever influence they have to ask 
it to desist.

SHAHID ZAHUR

Rawalpindi


http://rt.com/news/nato-attack-pakistan-us-305/



Pakistan to ‘completely review’ ties with US


Published: 27 November, 2011, 14:19 

Pakistani soldiers carry the coffins of theircomrades who were killed in a 
Saturday strike.Peshawar, November 27, 2011. (AFP Photo / A.Majeed) 

Pakistani soldiers carry the coffins of their comrades who were killed in a 
Saturday strike. Peshawar, November 27, 2011. (AFP Photo / A. Majeed)

TAGS: Conflict <http://rt.com/tags/conflict/> , Military 
<http://rt.com/tags/military/> , NATO <http://rt.com/tags/nato/> , Asia 
<http://rt.com/tags/asia/> , USA <http://rt.com/tags/usa/>  

Pakistan says it is reviewing its relations with the US and NATO and has taken 
“urgent action” after a NATO attack on Friday killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. A 
key Afghan border has been sealed and the US ordered to quit an air-base in the 
country.

­NATO helicopters allegedly fired on a checkpoint in northwest Pakistan’s 
Mohmand tribal area near the Afghan border.

The decision to review relations was taken at an urgent meeting of Pakistan’s 
government defense committee with the participation of Prime Minister Yousuf 
Raza Gilani and top military and government leaders. 

In a statement, officials said “the government will revisit and undertake a 
complete review of all programs, activities and co-operative arrangements with 
US/NATO/ISAF, including diplomatic, political, military and intelligence.”

Islamabad condemned what it called an “unprovoked attack” by NATO helicopters. 
The statement called for “strong and urgent action against those responsible 
for this aggression.”

Pakistan’s foreign minister, Hina Rabbani Khar, has told US Secretary of State 
Hillary Clinton that the incident has negated progress in improving the 
tattered alliance between the US and her country. AP quoted Khar as saying the 
attack was unacceptable and showed complete disregard for human life. She added 
that it had provoked rage among Pakistan’s citizens. 

For her part, Clinton expressed sympathy over the incident and promised the US 
would work together with Pakistan as NATO conducts an investigation into the 
incident. NATO has not officially claimed any responsibility so far.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has expressed his condolences, 
calling what happened on the border a tragic accident, Interfax reports. He 
said he had written to the Pakistani prime minister saying the deaths of 
Pakistan’s soldiers are as tragic and unacceptable as losses among the Afghan 
or international coalition.


Pakistan has cut a key NATO supply route to Afghanistan in the wake of the 
strike. Islamabad has also demanded that the US Air Force abandon Shamsi 
military airbase in Belujistan within 15 days in an official memorandum of the 
defense committee headed by Pakistan’s prime minister. 

Pakistani truck drivers carrying supplies to NATO troops in Afghanistan say 
they are now worried about militant attacks following the border closure. 
Nearly 300 trucks were stranded at the country’s two Afghan border crossings on 
Sunday after Islamabad decided to block the coalition’s supplies. Drivers say 
they hardly slept all night, fearing possible attacks. Suspected militants 
destroyed about 150 trucks a year ago after Pakistan closed the Torkham 
crossing for about 10 days following a similar incident.

The 24 soldiers killed in the assault were buried on Sunday, with a prayer 
ceremony for the deceased at the headquarters of the regional command in 
Peshawar being televised. The coffins were draped in green and white Pakistani 
flags. Two officers were reported to be among the dead.

About 500 members of Jamaat-e-Islami – Pakistan’s most influential religious 
party – staged a protest, yelling “Down with America” and “Jihad is the only 
answer to America”, Reuters reports. The rally took place in the Mohmand tribal 
area where the attack occurred. 


“They attacked our post and killed soldiers while they were asleep without any 
reason,” a senior Pakistani officer told Reuters.

Around 40 troops were stationed at the outposts at the time of the attack, 
military sources said. 


http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011



Pakistan buries troops as rage  
<http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C11%5C28%5Cstory_28-11-2011_pg1_1>
 spreads
* Thousands of enraged Pakistanis take to streets across country, burning an 
effigy of Obama and setting fire to US, NATO flags 

* Kayani attends troops’ funeral prayer in Peshawar

PESHAWAR: Pakistan on Sunday buried 24 troops killed in a NATO cross-border air 
attack that has pushed a crisis in relations between the United States...  
<http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011%5C11%5C28%5Cstory_28-11-2011_pg1_1>
 Full Story           


http://www.sananews.net/english/2011/11/pak-terms-83-percent-people-killed-during-drone-attacks-in-past-seven-years-%E2%80%98innocent%E2%80%99/


Pak terms 83 percent people killed during drone attacks in past seven years 
‘innocent’

South Asian News Agency (SANA) ⋅ November 25, 2011 

ISLAMABAD, (SANA): Pakistan has termed the 83 percent people killed in US drone 
attacks in tribal areas of the country during the past seven years as 
“innocent”.

On the other hand the Pakistan army has started adopting public and 
parliamentary opinion regarding the drone attacks.

According to a private TV channel it is revealed from the intelligence sources 
that most of the drone attacks are happened during the era of present 
government which are over 200; meanwhile the US has carried out 285 drone 
attacks in Pakistan so far from 2004 to till date.

During the current year 72 drone strikes has been carried out and from 2004, 
nearly 2780 people has been killed; meanwhile the intelligence institutions in 
their latest research report said that only 17 percent terrorists belonging to 
al-Qaeda and Taliban has been killed during these attacks.

Most of people killed in the drone attacks are innocent and include women, 
children and aged people and during the current year 46 drone attacks were 
carried out in North Waziristan Agency, 22 in South Waziristan Agency and two 
attacks were carried out in FATA and other areas of KPK.

On the other hand the military leadership would adopt policy which has been 
devised in the parliamentary resolutions in the light of the all parties 
conference recommendations; meanwhile the it has also been decided to take up 
the issue in United Nations and in this regard the data is being collected and 
the issue would be raised in front of UN Human Rights Council. 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to