Pointless Provocations
The Next War on Washington’s Agenda
by PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Only the blind do not see that the US government is preparing to 
attack Iran. Washington has deployed missiles directed at Iran in its 
oil emirate puppet states, Oman and the UAE, and little doubt in the 
other US puppet states in the Middle East. Washington has beefed up 
Saudi Arabia’s jet fighter force. Most recently, Washington has deployed 9,000 
US troops to Israel to participate in “war games” designed to 
test the US/Israeli air defense system. As Iran represents no threat 
unless attacked, Washington’s war preparations signal Washington’s 
intention to attack Iran.
Another signal that Washington has a new war on its agenda is the 
raised level of Washington’s rhetoric and demonization of Iran. Judging 
by polls Washington’s propaganda that Iran is threatening the US by 
developing a nuclear weapon has met with success. Half of the American 
public support a military attack on Iran in order to
prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear capability. Those of us who are 
trying to awaken our fellow citizens start from a deficit that the minds of 
half of the US population are under Big Brother’s control.
As the International Atomic Energy Agency’s reports from its 
inspectors on the ground in Iran have made clear for years, there is no 
evidence that Iran has diverted any enriched uranium from its nuclear 
energy program.  The shrill hype coming from Washington and from the 
neoconservative media is groundless. it is the same level of lie as 
Washington’s claim that Saddam Hussein in Iraq had weapons of mass 
destruction. Every US soldier who died in that war died in behalf of a 
lie.
It could not be more obvious that Washington’s war preparations 
against Iran have nothing to do with deterring Iran from a nuclear 
weapon.  So, what are the war preparations about?
In my judgment, the US government’s war preparations are driven by three 
factors.
One is the neoconservative ideology, adopted by the US government, 
that calls for the US to use its superior military and economic position to 
achieve world hegemony. This goal appeals to American hubris and to 
the power and profit that it serves.
A second factor is Israel’s desire to eliminate all support for the 
Palestinians and for Hezbollah in southern Lebanon. Israel’s goal is to 
seize all of Palestine and the water resources of southern Lebanon. 
Eliminating Iran removes all obstacles to Israel’s expansion.
A third factor is to deter or slow China’s rise as a military and 
economic power by controlling China’s access to energy. It was China’s 
oil investments in eastern Libya that led to the sudden move against 
Libya by the US and its NATO puppets, and it is China’s oil investments 
elsewhere in Africa that resulted in the Bush regime’s creation of the 
United States Africa Command, designed to counter China’s economic 
influence with US military influence.  China has significant energy 
investments in Iran, and a substantial percentage of China’s oil imports are 
from Iran.  Depriving China of independent access to oil is 
Washington’s way of restraining and boxing in China.
What we are witnessing is a replay of Washington’s policy toward 
Japan in the 1930s that provoked the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. 
Japan’s bank balances in the West were seized, and Japan’s access to oil and 
raw materials was restricted. The purpose was to prevent or to slow Japan’s 
rise.  The result was war.
Despite the hubris in which it wallows, Washington understands the 
vulnerability of its Fifth Fleet in the Persian Gulf and would not risk 
losing a fleet and 20,000 US naval personnel unless it was to gain an 
excuse for a nuclear attack on Iran. A nuclear attack on Iran would 
alert both China and Russia that they could suffer the same fate. The 
consequence would be that the world would face a higher risk of nuclear 
armageddon than existed in the mutually assured destruction of the 
US-Soviet standoff.
Washington is getting all of us in over our heads. Washington has 
declared the “Asia-Pacific” and the South China Sea to be areas of 
“America’s national interest.”  What sense does this make?  It makes the same 
sense as if China declared the Gulf of Mexico and the 
Mediterranean Sea to be areas of China’s national interest.
Washington has deployed 2,500 Marines, promising more to come, to 
Australia in order to do what?  Protect Australia from China or occupy 
Australia?  Encircle China with 2,500 Marines?  It would  not mean 
anything to China if Washington deployed 25,000 Marines in Australia.
When you get right down to it, Washington’s tough talk is nothing but a silly 
pointless  provocation of Washington’s largest creditor. What 
if Washington’s idiocy causes China to worry that Washington and its UK 
and European puppets will seize its bank balances and refuse to honor 
China’s holdings of $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds? Will China pull 
its balances from the weak US, UK, and European banks?  Will China 
decide to strike first, not with nuclear weapons, but by selling its $1 
trillion in Treasury bonds all at once?
It would be cheaper than war.
The Federal Reserve would have to quickly print another $1 trillion 
dollars with which to buy the bonds, or US interest rates would shoot 
up.  What would China do with the $1 trillion in newly printed paper?  
In my opinion, China would dump it all at once in the currency market, 
because the Federal Reserve cannot print euros, UK pounds, Japanese yen, Swiss 
francs, Russian rubles, and Chinese yuan with which to buy up its newly printed 
currency.
The US dollar would take a beating. US import prices–which now 
include, thanks to offshoring, almost everything Americans consume–would rise. 
The hard-pressed 90% would take a further beating, endearing 
their Washington oppressors to them to an even greater extent.  The rest of the 
world, anticipating nuclear war, would flee the dollar, as 
Washington would be a primary attack target.
If the missiles aren’t launched, Americans would wake up the next day a 
bankrupt third world country. If the missiles were launched, few 
Americans would wake up.
We, as Americans, need to ask ourselves what all this is about?  Why 
is our government so provocative toward Islam, Russia, China, Iran?  
What purpose, whose purpose is being served?  Certainly not ours.
Who benefits from our bankrupt government starting yet more wars, 
picking this time not on defenseless countries like Iraq and Libya, but 
on China and Russia?  Do the idiots in Washington think the Russian 
government does not know why Russia is being surrounded with missile 
bases and radar systems?  Do they really believe that the Russian 
government will fall for its lie that the missiles are directed against 
Iran?  Only American idiots who sit in front of Fox “news” could 
possible believe that the real issue is an Iranian nuclear weapon.
How much longer will the Russian government permit the US National 
Endowment for Democracy, a CIA front, to interfere in its elections by 
financing  opposition parties led by the likes of Vladimir Kara-Murza, 
Boris Nemtsov, and Alexei Navalny, who organize protests of every 
election that Putin’s party wins, alleging without any evidence 
whatsoever, but providing propaganda for Washington, who no doubt pays 
well, that the election will be and was stolen?
In the US, such activists would be declared to be “domestic 
extremists” and be subjected to rough treatment. In America even 
anti-war activists are subjected to home invasions by the FBI and grand 
jury investigations.
What this means is that “the criminal state of Russia” is a more 
tolerant democracy than the US, or for that matter, America’s puppet 
states in Europe and the UK.
Where do we go from here?  If not to nuclear destruction, Americans 
must wake up.  Football games, porn, and shopping malls are one thing.  
Survival of human life is another.  Washington, that is, “representative 
government,” consists only of a few powerful vested interests. These 
private interests, not the American people, control the US government.
That is why nothing that the US government does  benefits the American people.
The current crop of presidential contenders, except for Ron Paul, 
represent the controlling interests. War and financial fraud are the 
only remaining American Values.
Will Americans again give the sheen of “democracy” to rule by a few by 
participating in the coming rigged elections?
If you have to vote, vote for Ron Paul or for a more extreme third 
party candidate. Show that you do not support the lie that is the 
system.
Stop watching television. Stop reading newspapers. Stop spending 
money. When you do any of these things, you are supporting evil.
PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS was an editor of the Wall Street Journal and an Assistant 
Secretary of the U.S. Treasury.  His latest book, HOW THE ECONOMY WAS LOST, has 
just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached through his 
website 
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/12/the-next-war-on-washington%E2%80%99s-agenda/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to