Hi. Please ignore yesterday's warning about a virus. It's a hoax, per several responses - It's longer valid, per others . However , what's below is a genuine, profound danger, like the camel with its nose under the edge of the tent. Stay tuned. Apologies for the virus notice . Ed
MoveOn.org: CENSORED <http://s3.moveon.org/images/mo-logo-censored.png> If you have a website, join the blackout to protest Internet censorship legislation on January 18. Join the Blackout <http://moveon.org/blackout/jointheblackout.html?id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t= 1> Dear MoveOn member, Tomorrow, MoveOn.org will go dark. No news, no information, no resources. Why? Because we're protesting Internet censorship. Websites all over the Internet, including sites like YouTube and even MoveOn.org, could be made unavailable if big entertainment companies, the Chamber of Commerce, and their lobbyists get their way by ramming Internet censorship legislation through the Senate. That's why tomorrow, Wednesday, January 18, we're joining Reddit, Wikipedia, Mozilla, Wordpress, TwitPic, Boing Boing, and thousands of other sites and blacking out MoveOn.org in protest.1 You can participate in the blackout too and show the world tomorrow why you oppose Internet censorship. Do you have a website? <http://moveon.org/blackout/jointheblackout.html?id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t= 2> Yes, I have a website and will participate in the blackout. <http://pol.moveon.org/pac/nointernetcensorship/letter.html?id=34811-7187494 -q0os35x&t=3> No, I don't have a website, but I want to participate. Last summer, these greedy corporations and their lobbyists thought they could wave their wallets and pass whatever bill they wanted that would harm the Internet. But over 230,000 MoveOn members, along with hundreds of thousands of other activists, spoke loudly at the end of 2011, letting Congress know that we would not support Internet censorship. The result of this was a significant weakening of support for the bill in the House.2 They heard us then, and the Senate needs to a strong statement from us now because they're set to vote on this bill on January 24. So we're taking tomorrow to show just what the Internet would look like in an Internet censorship era. If you don't like it, let everyone you're connected to online know tomorrow. Then stay tuned for the next phase of this fight. <http://moveon.org/blackout/jointheblackout.html?id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t= 4> Yes, I have a website and will participate in the blackout. <http://pol.moveon.org/pac/nointernetcensorship/letter.html?id=34811-7187494 -q0os35x&t=5> No, I don't have a website, but I want to participate. Thanks for all you do. -Garlin, Elena, Peter, Mark, and the rest of the team Sources: 1. "Wikipedia Blackout: Websites Wikipedia, Reddit, Others Go Dark Wednesday to Protest SOPA, PIPA," ABC News, January 17, 2012 <http://www.moveon.org/r?r=269602&id=&id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t=6> http://www.moveon.org/r?r=269602&id=&id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t=6 2. "SOPA on hold, PIPA may be weakened as Congress revisits the bills." InfoWorld, January 16, 2012 <http://www.moveon.org/r?r=269603&id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t=7> http://www.moveon.org/r?r=269603&id=34811-7187494-q0os35x&t=7 Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 5 million members-no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. <https://pol.moveon.org/donate/donate.html?cpn_id=44&id=34811-7187494-q0os35 x&t=8> Chip in here. _____ PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. This email was sent to Ed Pearl on January 17, 2012. To change your email address or update your contact info, <http://moveon.org/subscrip/coa.html?id=34811-7187494-q0os35x> click here. To remove yourself from this list, <http://moveon.org/s?i=34811-7187494-q0os35x> click here. <http://open.moveon.org/o.gif?id=34811-7187494-q0os35x> * * * http://www.democracynow.org/2012/1/17/wikipedia_reddit_to_shut_down_sites Democracy Now Interview: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 AMY GOODMAN: If you want to know more about two controversial internet anti-piracy bills moving through Congress, you won't be able to consult Wikipedia on Wednesday. The online encyclopedia and sixth most visited site in the world will join websites like the content aggregator Reddit to "go dark" for 12 to 24 hours in opposition to the Stop Online Piracy, or SOPA, Act and its companion bill, the Protect IP Act. Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales announced the decision to bring down his website last night on Twitter, writing, quote, "Student warning! Do your homework early. Wikipedia protesting bad law on Wednesday!" The White House responded over the weekend to two petitions opposing the bills. The administration's chief technology officials wrote on White House blog <http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/14/obama-administration-responds-we- people-petitions-sopa-and-online-piracy> Saturday, quote, "We will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk, or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet." While the White House did not take a definite position on SOPA and the Protect IP Act, it has called for legislation to combat online piracy that has hurt the legislation's main backers: Hollywood movie studios and music publishers who want to stop the theft of their creative content. Now a vote on SOPA is on hold in the House. The Senate is still scheduled to vote on the piracy issue next Tuesday, a week from today. Well, to talk more about the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA, and the Protect IP Act, we go to San Francisco to talk Corynne McSherry, who is the intellectual property director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. We welcome you to Democracy Now! Please explain both of these bills. It's very tough, I think, for most people to understand the technical aspects of this legislation. CORYNNE McSHERRY: Sure. In a nutshell, what these bills propose are new powers for the government and also for private actors to create, effectively, blacklists of sites that allegedly are engaging in some form of online infringement and then force service providers to block access to those sites. And that's why we call these the censorship bills, because effectively what we would have is a situation where the government and private actors could censor the net. So, U.S. citizens would basically get a different version of the internet, different from what you might get in, say, Italy or even China. AMY GOODMAN: So, explain the difference between SOPA and the Protect IP Act. CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, currently they're quite-they're quite similar. As drafted, SOPA was much broader than the Protect IP Act, and the folks behind the bill realized that maybe it was a little bit too broad, so they tailored it down. So now they're quite similar. One of the differences is that SOPA is, finally, after a great deal of activism, more or less on hold for now. But Senator Reid is saying that he's going to push forward the Protect IP Act, despite all of the opposition. AMY GOODMAN: And explain who is behind these two acts. CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, that's not a great mystery. Both of these acts are clearly being pushed hard by the big media industries, who seem to think that online piracy is why they're having trouble, and actually, who insist that they're having all kinds of trouble and they're failing immediately if something doesn't-if legislation isn't passed immediately, they're going to all go under, which is not true. In fact, the motion picture industry has been posting record profits for five years straight. AMY GOODMAN: In a December hearing of the House Judiciary Committee, Congress Member Jason Chaffetz, a Republican from Utah, talked about the lack of expert consultation in drafting SOPA. REP. JASON CHAFFETZ: I was trying to think of a way to try to describe my concerns with this bill, but basically, we're going to create-we're going to do surgery on the internet, and we haven't had a doctor in the room tell us how we're going to change these organs. We're basically going to reconfigure the internet and how it's going to work, without bringing in the nerds, without bringing in the doctors. And again, I worry that we did not take the time to have a hearing to truly understand what it is we're doing. And to my colleagues, I would say, if you don't know what DNSSEC is, you don't know what you're doing. And so, my concern is that there is a problem, but this is not necessarily the right remedy. AMY GOODMAN: That was Utah Congress Member Chaffetz. Corynne McSherry, your response? CORYNNE McSHERRY: I think he's absolutely right. SOPA, in particular, was negotiated without any consultation with the technology sector. They were specifically excluded. And one of the things I think is really exciting, though, is that-you know, no one asked the internet-well, the internet is speaking now. And so, we're seeing all kinds of opposition all over the web. And there's going to be a day of action tomorrow. People are really rising up and saying, "Don't interfere with basic internet infrastructure. We won't stand for it." AMY GOODMAN: What do you make of President Obama's position on the bill, Corynne? CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, it was heartening to see the White House statement and see the White House sort of stand with the internet and stand with its own commitments against censorship and against online censorship, in particular. Up until recently, we have been very concerned that there seemed to be a contradiction. On the one hand, you had Hillary Clinton criticizing foreign governments for online censorship and for censoring web results and so on. But at the same time, you had these bills rocketing through Congress that would propose very similar things. So, it was good to see the White House stand against that and criticize these bills. On the other hand, I am concerned that the White House seems to think that some kind of legislation needs to be passed this year. And I actually don't think the case has been made for that. AMY GOODMAN: Talk about the whole issue of the protection of artists, for example, the music industry and their concerns. CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, look, there's no question that there's plenty of infringement online. That's been true for a long time now. The question is how you're going to answer it. And the best way to respond-it's very clear at this point. The best way to respond to online infringement is to give people a better alternative. And when that happens, people go to that. So that's the best way to do it. It's not to pretend that the Pirate Bay doesn't exist; it's to give people an alternative to the Pirate Bay. And one of the things that we've seen is that, actually, independent artists are taking advantage of new technologies to reach the-reach new audiences. Music fans have more access to more music than they ever had before, and different kinds of music. And that's what happens when you take advantage of new technologies, as opposed to running away from it. AMY GOODMAN: Let me read you a tweet that Murdoch sent out this weekend: "So Obama has thrown in his lot with Silicon Valley paymasters who threaten all software creators with piracy, plain thievery." CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, you know, I think it's ironic to talk about paymasters, given the amount of money that Hollywood has been spending in Congress to try to ram these bills through. I think it is true that the Obama administration has somewhat stood with Silicon Valley here, but I think Silicon Valley knows how to protect itself against so-called software piracy better than Rupert Murdoch will. AMY GOODMAN: Finally, the votes, where they stand this week? CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, what we're seeing now is Harry Reid, Senator Reid, is insisting that he's going to go forward with a vote next Tuesday on the Protect IP Act. We'll see what happens over the course of the week. Things have changed a lot. And after the day of action tomorrow, a lot of us are hopeful that Senator Reid will think better of trying to push this bill through, given the level of opposition. It's really just a bad idea, particularly when you think about what they're doing here. This is basic internet infrastructure that they're messing with. And I think that Representative Chaffetz had it exactly right. It's foolish to go in and interfere with internet infrastructure when you don't know what you're doing. AMY GOODMAN: And overall, SOPA and PIPA, how they've been separated? CORYNNE McSHERRY: Well, SOPA seems to be on hold for now. If PIPA is rammed through, it may be that in the House of Representatives they will try to revive SOPA and sort of bring the two bills in line. I certainly hope not, because that would be very, very dangerous for human rights, for internet security, and send an extremely negative signal around the world that the United States government does in fact support censorship, as long as you say that you're doing it in the name of intellectual property enforcement. AMY GOODMAN: Corynne McSherry, I want to thank you for being with us, intellectual property director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. When we come back, we'll be joined by author Rebecca MacKinnon. She has just written the book, Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom. This is Democracy Now! Back in a minute. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
