Give Apple Workers a Voice in their Future!
Posted on March 23, 2012 by 
paulgarver 
A most unusual joint statement by two 
major international labor organizations and 3 NGOs demands that Apple respect 
the rights of Chinese assembly workers to collective bargaining over wages and 
working conditions.  The statement is signed by the International 
Metalworkers’ Federation (IMF), International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), 
GoodElectronics, MakeITFair, Students & Scholars Against Corporate 
Misbehaviour (SACOM), and SumOfUs. pdf 
file here
23 March 2012
 By joining the Fair Labor Association, Apple has embarked on its latest 
program of auditing its suppliers, ostensibly to investigate and remedy the 
appalling abuses in its supply chain that have been well documented and widely 
reported. While Apple claims that it is finally taking the issue seriously, its 
top-down auditing approach can never be a long-term solution to the systematic 
violations of labour rights that are occurring every day in the manufacture of 
electronic products. Indeed, Apple promised in 2006 that auditing would protect 
the rights of workers in its global supply chain, with results that are all too 
apparent.
The FLA will likely publish next week some of the results of its audits at 
Foxconn and the organization will no doubt report that labor rights violations 
are taking place at these factories. Since violations at Foxconn have been well 
documented by independent investigators, and in many cases admitted by Apple 
itself, the FLA could hardly claim that all is well. We also have no doubt that 
the FLA’s report will be coupled with another round of promises from Apple and 
Foxconn that they will finally clean up their act. The question, however, is 
not 
whether there are severe labor rights problems in Apple’s supply chain. This 
has 
been obvious for years. And the question is not whether Apple will promise, 
again, to fix these problems. They surely will. The question is whether 
anything 
will actually change.
Because once the audits are over and FLA has gone home, the workers in the 
factories will again be left to deal, as best they can, with the brutal labour 
conditions that are imposed on them. Any hope that conditions for workers will 
improve rests not on the work of auditors, but on the ability of workers 
themselves to monitor whether their labour rights are being respected and to 
push for remedies when they are not.
If Apple is genuinely concerned about improving the labour rights of workers 
that manufacture its products, it must ensure that they can negotiate with 
their 
employer to bring lasting change to the way that work is performed and 
compensated. For the Foxconn workers this means allowing workers to conduct 
elections to democratically select their own representatives in the workplace 
who can negotiate with management on the pay and conditions of the workforce. 
Such elections must be conducted by the workers without interference from 
management and all managers must be prohibited from taking up union positions. 
In order for the elected worker representatives to be able to meet management 
on 
an equal footing to negotiate on pay and working conditions, they will need 
support in terms of skills and knowledge. Apple must therefore insist that 
union 
representatives be allowed to access training and capacity building that is 
independent of management, so that they have the knowledge and skills necessary 
to advocate on behalf of the workers they represent.
Collective bargaining is the mechanism that will enable workers to negotiate 
with management on appropriate levels of pay and decent working conditions and 
is one of the fundamental labour rights recognized by the ILO. It is especially 
critical to addressing health and safety problems. Apple and Foxconn must 
immediately establish a schedule of negotiations which will lead to a 
collective 
agreement that covers all aspects of work including wages and working hours, 
overtime, health and safety, etc. A collective agreement would help reduce the 
vast disparity between workers’ pay and the massive profits generated by both 
Foxconn and Apple, which has announced that it has $45 billion to spend on 
buying back its own shares rather than on improving pay and conditions for the 
workers that make its products.
There is no question that giving workers a real say in the way that their 
work is organized and remunerated will challenge the repressive management 
practices for which Foxconn is notorious. Foxconn must learn to work together 
with its employees, through their democratically elected representatives, to 
find solutions together that reconcile the demands of production with 
recognition of workers’ rights. This will mean giving access to information on 
wages, working hours, production schedules and financial information that 
enable 
worker representatives to take an equal seat at the table and work with 
management to resolve the issues. It will also mean that Apple must roll up its 
sleeves and get involved directly in the bargaining process, so that its 
demands 
on unit prices and production deadlines do not undermine agreements on pay and 
working conditions.
Bargaining should take place above a floor of decent minimum standards. This 
must include an immediate end to illegal overtime hours, coupled with wage 
increase to ensure that every worker in Apple’s supply chain is paid a genuine 
living wage that covers basic needs for a family for a statutory work week (40 
hours in China). Given Apple’s gargantuan profits and mountainous horde of 
cash, 
there is no financial, practical or moral excuse for any worker making Apple 
products to go another day without being paid a living wage for a normal 
workweek.
Finally, it is clear that organizations like ours will need to continue to 
scrutinize conditions in Apple’s supply chain for the foreseeable future, to 
hold the company accountable and remedy any abuses. For this to be possible, 
Apple must be more forthcoming about the identity of its suppliers, not just 
releasing the company names, but the countries and specific factories in which 
all the components that go into its products are made.
SACOM is a Hong Kong based investigative NGO advocating for rights of 
workers in China.
The International Metalworkers Federation (IMF) is the global union for 
electronics workers.
The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is the global umbrella 
organization for most national trade union confederations.
Good Electronics and MakeITFair are European-based advocacy 
organizations.
SumofUs is a USA-based global advocacy 
organization.
 
 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to