Now we hear of allegations of also prostitution in El Salvador, lots of
very poor women out their...

 Following the outcry over Secret Service agents using prostitutes in
Colombia before the Summit of the Americas, a Brazilian sex worker is
planning to sue the US embassy over injuries she received last year in a
dispute with an embassy staffer and three marines, reports the
AP<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/panetta-says-4-marines-were-demoted-punished-for-attack-on-brazil-prostitute-last-year/2012/04/24/gIQAxgNFfT_story.html>.
US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who is in Brazil as part of his tour of
South America, told press that the group had pushed the woman from a car
during a dispute over payment. Sources told the AP that the sex worker
broke her collarbone in the fall, and that the embassy had contacted her
and paid her medical bills. Now, emboldened by the response to the
Cartagena scandal, the woman has hired a lawyer.

-----------------------


  *You are here:* Perspective <http://colombiareports.com/opinion.html> From
The Editor <http://colombiareports.com/opinion/from-the-editor.html> So why
did Secret Service agents sleep with prostitutes?
     So why did Secret Service agents sleep with prostitutes?
<http://colombiareports.com/opinion/from-the-editor/23627-enough-excuses-for-secret-service-agents.html>
Monday, 23 April 2012 14:13 Miriam Wells
  
<http://digg.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcolombiareports.com%2Fopinion%2Ffrom-the-editor%2F23627-enough-excuses-for-secret-service-agents.html&title=So%20why%20did%20Secret%20Service%20agents%20sleep%20with%20prostitutes?>

[image: Colombia Reports - prostitutes]

The U.S. Secret Service agents had sex with prostitutes in
Cartagena<http://colombiareports.com/travel-in-colombia/cartagena.html>because
they wanted to have sex with prostitutes. Can we stop beating
around the bush, blaming the predatory and oh so irresistibly beautiful
women, the sun, the sand, the cocktails, everything but the agents
themselves, and get one thing straight? Those men wanted to buy sex, so
they did.

The Washington Post stepped into the ring
Monday<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/cartagenas-night-life-spelled-trouble-for-secret-service/2012/04/22/gIQAUMWpaT_story.html>to
consider just how these poor unsuspecting agents might have ended up
getting into a spot of bother in the days preceding President Obama's
arrival in Colombia <http://colombiareports.com/>.

"Cartagena is swimming in prostitutes," says their Mexico/Central America
bureau chief William Booth. In the colonial city's streets, "streetwalkers
were swarming around male tourists, hissing "Hola papi!" and begging to
join them for a drink." One thing is apparent, says Booth: "The agents were
in the right place to get into trouble."

The piece follows a widely-distributed AP
article<http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/carnal-cartagena-nonplussed-sex-scandal-16159177>discussing
the "uncontrolled sexuality" of "carnal Cartagena." The ubiquity
of sex-for-sale was also highlighted. "At almost all hours, prostitutes are
available nearby," pointed out the writer. "Five propositioned a foreigner
two blocks from the hotel <http://www.hotelsincolombia.eu/> [Caribe, where
the U.S. delegation was staying], several beckoning from across the avenue."

Now don't get me wrong. I am certainly not going to deny that prostitutes
are available in abundance in Cartagena. And shockingly, they tout for
business! They try to get men to buy their product!

I just firmly object to the implied conclusion that this somehow turns the
men into unsuspecting targets who are helpless to do anything but buy this
sex which is being shoved so blatantly in their face.

I would go so far as to call the Post's tone -- describing a world where
streetwalkers "swarm" and "hiss," wearing "tight black dresses and high
heels and ready to "party"" -- offensive.

There are a few key facts which have been all but ignored in the coverage
of the titillating "Secret Service Sex Scandal." Most importantly, the
reasons why Cartagena is such a booming sex tourism destination. It doesn't
happen by accident.

This beautiful colonial city, the "jewel in Colombia's crown," is an
upmarket tourist destination, markedly different from the rest of the
country in its appearance and its prices. But venture off the beaches
and outside the walled city and you'll find a very different place.

Bolivar, the department containing Cartagena, is one of the five poorest in
Colombia. It's estimated that 60% of the city's residents live below the
U.N. poverty level of $2 a day, and most of the rest, if not living in
absolute poverty, are poor.

This combination of a poor population and a constant stream of wealthy
visitors creates the prime conditions for sex tourism. Yes, the lax laws
and wide acceptance of prostitution make the purchase of sex a much more
accessible and simple enterprise in Cartagena than in other places around
the world. But that has very little to do with the reasons why women are
selling their bodies, and the reasons men are buying them.

Contrary to what many would have us believe, the majority of women working
in prostitution around the world are doing it because they are struggling
to survive, often with a history of abuse and drug addiction -- a stark
contrast to the popular media portrayal of a "high-class hooker," happy to
"escort" men to fund a lavish lifestyle.

Cartagena is no exception. There is no shortage of vulnerable, desperate
communities in Colombia, a country which has endured years of armed
conflict and boasts the largest number of internally displaced people in
the world -- 3.67 million, according to the last U.N. estimate.

Of course Cartagena prostitutes are keen to push themselves on potential
customers -- they need money. As for why the men are taking the opportunity
to buy them, that I can't say.

What I can say is that a man that pays for sex in Cartagena is a man that
thinks it's okay to pay for sex, and that a man who thinks it's okay to pay
for sex has certain attitudes towards women that don't just magically
arrive when he steps off the plane into the tropical heat of exotic lands
like Colombia.

It is a common theme to blame outside factors, or often just women
themselves, for the variety of ways in which men abuse women -- rape and
domestic violence being the most obvious examples.

The idea that men just can't resist buying sex when prostitutes flaunt
themselves in tight miniskirts is just one more fallacy on the spectrum
that labels women who dress provocatively more susceptible to rape and
those that constantly nag their husbands more likely to get hit.

Cartagena's night life "spelled trouble" for the Secret Service, according
to the Washington Post, as if any man would be at risk, when confronted
with such tempting female bodies, of being forced to get their wallet out
to buy them.

"Oops! Here I am penetrating you!" cries our victim, as he gets his money's
worth in a hotel bed, outsmarted by his smug female predator.

Right. So on the one hand, these Secret Service agents are the best in the
business, among the smartest, toughest security troops in the world, able
to use their razor-sharp wit and cunning to navigate any unforeseen
situation and protect the world's most powerful man. On the other, they're
hapless men unable to control their raging sexual appetites the minute they
wander out of their Cartagena hotel and bump into a woman with a lowcut top.

Let's stop blaming the women and stop blaming Colombia -- the U.S. agents
slept with prositutes because they wanted to sleep with prostitutes. End of
story.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to