Did You Like George W. Bush’s Foreign Policy?

Apr 26, 2012 

Mitt Romney’s Misguided, Mistaken, and Misbegotten Foreign Policy
Today, Vice President Biden gave a speech at New York University laying out a 
broad attack on Mitt Romney — a candidate whose only foreign policy experience 
comes from shipping jobs overseas — and his approach to foreign policy. Biden 
said that Romney was relying on the American people developing a ”collective 
amnesia” about the policies of the past — namely those of the Bush 
administration and the Cold War– that Romney is advocating a return to. 
Romney’s desire for amnesia is probably particularly true when it comes to a 
disastrous press call that his campaign held today in order to attempt to 
attack the president on foreign policy.

Here’s the rundown.

Back to the Cold War

In his speech today, the vice president called Romney “one of a small group of 
Cold War holdovers” — a reference to Romney’s recent and much-maligned 
statement that Russia remains “without question our number one geopolitical 
foe.” This misguided and mistaken view of foreign policy was much in evidence 
on today’s Romney press call.

One Romney adviser, former Navy Secretary John Lehman, brought up the threat 
posed by the Soviet Union, which ceased to exist in 1991:

We are seeing the Soviets pushing into the Arctic with no response from us. In 
fact the only response from us is to announce the early retirement of the last 
remaining ice breaker.

Another Romney adviser, former Ambassador Pierre Prosper, launched a multiply 
false attack on the president involving Czechoslovakia, a country which ceased 
to exist in 1992:

The United States abandoned its missile defense sites in Poland and 
Czechoslovakia, yet Russia does nothing but obstruct us, or efforts in Iran and 
Syria.

Mitt Romney himself recently made a reference to the “Soviets” when trying to 
attack the president for reaching a far-reaching arms reduction treaty that 
helped pave the way for greater Russian cooperation on Iran, among other things.

Back to Bush

Many of Romney’s top foreign policy advisers are the same Bush administration 
hands and neoconservatives that helped push us into the Iraq War. Leading the 
attack on Romney’s behalf today was Dan Senor, best known for his role as 
senior adviser to and spokesman for Paul Bremer, the U.S. viceroy that headed 
the Coalition Provisional Authority, which is widely blamed for botching the 
early days of the occupation.

In October of 2003, Senor infamously declared that “the good news is that the 
overwhelming majority of Iraqi people have embraced the liberation and are 
grateful for all we are doing to reconstruct their country.” He also boasted 
that Iraq “was a model for the region” of a nation at peace with its citizens 
and claimed that “ninety-five percent of the country is at peace and returning 
to normal daily life.”

Steve Benen from MSNBC makes the key point:

When Team Romney needs a credible GOP voice to attack the Obama 
administration’s foreign policy and advise the inexperienced former governor on 
international affairs, it turns to this guy.

Remember, the Republican National Committee believes the party’s agenda in 2013 
will simply be a warmed over version of Bush’s policies. Romney surrounding 
himself with officials from the Bush/Cheney administration helps drive the 
point home.

As ThinkProgress Security’s Eli Clifton wrote today, the vice president also 
laid into Romney for his “loose talk” about war with Iran:

Biden’s harshest reprimand of Romney was saved for the former Massachusetts 
governor’s critique of President Obama’s Iran policy. Romney has swung between 
essentially endorsing the Obama administration’s policy of diplomacy plus 
pressure — via sanctions — to calling for outright military action against 
Iran. Biden said:

Here’s what he says. He says we need “crippling sanctions,” apparently unaware 
that through President Obama’s leadership we produced just that, crippling 
sanctions. He emphasizes the need for “a credible military option” and “a 
regular presence of aircraft carrier groups” in the region, apparently ignorant 
of the fact that’s exactly what our policy is and what we’re doing.

Biden singled out Romney’s criticisms of the White House’s Iran-policy as 
“counterproductive” and promoting “loose talk of war” that could ultimately 
hurt the international sanctions regime engineered by the administration:

I think it’s fair to say the only step we could take that we aren’t already 
taking is to launch a war against Iran. If that’s what governor Romney means by 
a “very different policy” then he should tell the American people. He should 
say so. Otherwise the governor’s tough talk about military action is just that, 
talk. And I would add, counterproductive talk. Folks, loose talk about a war 
has incredible negative consequences in our efforts to end Iran’s nuclear 
quest. And let me tell you why, because it unsettles world oil markets. It 
drives up oil prices. When oil prices go up, Iran’s coffers fill up, 
undermining the effect of the sanctions that are already in place. This type of 
Romney Talk is just not smart.

Mitt Romney also shares something else with George W. Bush — a lackadaisical 
attitude about capturing or killing Osama bin Laden. In March 2002, just months 
after the 9/11 attacks, Bush said, “I truly am not that concerned about him. I 
am deeply concerned about Iraq.” “I really just don’t spend that much time on 
him, to be honest with you,” Bush added. In 2007, Romney said that catching bin 
Laden would be “insignificant” and it’s “not worth moving heaven and earth.”

No wonder that Romney surrogate and vice-presidential contender Marco Rubio 
neglected to mention either al-Qaeda or Iraq during his “major address” on 
foreign policy yesterday.

IN TWO SENTENCES: As Vice President Biden said today, “Osama bin Laden is dead 
and General Motors is alive. If Governor Romney had been president, could he 
have used the same slogan in reverse?”





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to