<http://www.nytimes.com/> The New York Times

 




  _____  

May 13, 2012


Injustices of Stop and Frisk


The pressure is increasing on the New York City Police Department to reform
its stop-and-frisk program under which New Yorkers, nearly all innocent of
any crime, were stopped by the police close to 700,000 times last year. 

The department said recently that it was instructing precinct commanders to
review the legality of all stop-and-frisk reports, according to a report
<http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2012/may/09/nypd-ordered-review-stop
-and-frisk-activity/>  by WNYC. But such reviews - which should have been
done all along - will be meaningless unless independent investigators
actually interview officers to determine the proportion of stops based on
reasonable suspicion, as required by law, and the percentage based on
improper racial profiling, in which blacks and Hispanics are singled out. 

The statistics are getting worse by the year. Last week, the New York Civil
Liberties Union released a report
<http://www.nyclu.org/files/publications/NYCLU_2011_Stop-and-Frisk_Report.pd
f>  - based on the department's data - showing the number of street stops
had grown to 685,724 in 2011 from about 97,000 in 2002, the year Mayor
Michael Bloomberg took office. On Friday, the Police Department released
data
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/nyregion/new-york-police-data-shows-incre
ase-in-stop-and-frisks.html>  showing that the stops have occurred at an
even higher pace for the first three months of this year. 

The city has repeatedly argued that the program helps to keep guns off the
street. But the N.Y.C.L.U.'s analysis found that the proportion of gun
seizures to stops has fallen sharply - only 780 guns were confiscated last
year, not much more than the 604 guns seized in 2003, when officers made
160,851 stops. Young black and Hispanic men continued to be stopped in
disproportionate numbers. They are only 4.7 percent of the city's
population, yet these males, between the ages of 14 and 24, accounted for
41.6 percent of stops last year. More than half of all stops were conducted
because the individual displayed "furtive movements" - which is so vague as
to be meaningless. 

The data also show that the police are significantly more likely to use
force when they stop blacks and Hispanics than when they stop whites. This
means minority targets are more likely to be slammed against walls or
spread-eagled while officers go through their belongings. Even when victims
are unhurt, they are likely to develop a deep and abiding distrust of law
enforcement. 

For all this, only about 6 percent of stops lead to arrests. But the stops
can also end with officers writing summonses for minor infractions like
disorderly conduct. The police issue more than 500,000 summonses a year,
most not arising from street stops but as part of the "quality of life"
campaign the department embarked on in the 1990s. 

Some infractions can result in fines - some reaching hundreds of dollars -
that can be hard for poor families to pay. Moreover, an unknown number of
people who receive summonses do not show up in court to face judgment or pay
their fines. Failure to appear can then lead to a bench warrant. The next
time the person is stopped on the street, the outstanding warrant can lead
to his being handcuffed and taken to jail. What began as a minor "quality of
life" violation turns into an arrest record. 

Some former police officers, seeing this pattern, are increasingly vocal in
their complaints about commanders forcing officers to make as many stops and
to write as many summonses as possible. Some, like John Eterno, a retired
police captain and chairman of the criminal justice department at Molloy
College on Long Island, have talked openly
<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/08/nyregion/no-room-for-dissent-in-a-police-
department-consumed-by-the-numbers.html>  about a "quota system" for stops,
which department leaders deny. 

Several lawsuits have been filed by legal groups challenging the use of
stop-and-frisk in many settings, including in public housing. The mounting
evidence reveals a pattern of abusive policing that warrants the attention
of the Justice Department, which should be using its broad authority to
investigate these practices. 

 

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/article/upNext/upnext_rest.png


More in Opinion (4 of 17 articles)


 

 


_______________________________________
No infections found in this outgoing message
Scanned by iolo System Shield®
http://www.iolo.com



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to