http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/hope_burning_20120531/

Hope Burning

 
<http://www.truthdig.com/images/eartothegrounduploads/AP070923054111-320.jpg
>       
AP/Rafiq Maqbool        

An aerial view of Kabul, Afghanistan is seen through the window of a
Soviet-era helicopter. Much more sophisticated weapons are at the
president's disposal when he orders an assassination. 

By  <http://www.truthdig.com/robert_scheer/> Robert Scheer

Truthdig: May 31, 2012

So now we have Rambo Obama, a steely warrior who, according to a lengthy
leaked insider account in The New York Times, hurls death-dealing drones at
anyone who threatens the good old USA. Including children. Those children
are presumed guilty by virtue of proximity, and the Times plays along, not
even modifying a targeted terrorist with the word "alleged," as once had
been the paper's convention: "When a rare opportunity for a drone strike at
a top terrorist arises-but his family is with him-it is the president who
has reserved to himself the final moral calculation."

Obama as the cool triggerman is an image useful to White House operatives as
they buff the president's persona for the coming election. But what it
reveals is the mindset of a political cynic whose seductive words cloak the
moral indifference of a methodical executioner. Forget Harry Truman, who
obliterated the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or Lyndon
Johnson, who carpet-bombed millions in Vietnam. The Democrats have got
themselves another killer, one whose techniques are as devastatingly
effective, but brilliantly refined.

The story obviously was planted in The New York Times to benefit the Obama
political campaign. Otherwise, why would the president's former chief of
staff, William Daley, and three dozen current and past intelligence insiders
provide the newspaper with the most sensitive details of national security
decision-making? 

Pfc. Bradley Manning was held for many months in solitary confinement for
allegedly disclosing information of far lower security classification. The
difference is that the top secrets in the news article are ones the
president wants leaked in the expectation they will burnish his "tough on
terrorism" credentials. This is clearly not the Obama whom many voted for in
the hope that he would stick by his word, including the pledge he made on
his second day in office to ban brutal interrogation and close the prison at
Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. "What the new president did not say was that the
orders contained a few subtle loopholes," the Times now reports concerning
the early promises by Obama. "They reflected a still unfamiliar Barack
Obama, a realist who, unlike some of his fervent supporters, was never
carried away by his own rhetoric."

Parse that sentence carefully to learn much of what is morally decrepit in
our journalism as well as politics. The word "realist" is now identical to
"hypocrite," and the condemnation of immoral behavior addresses nothing more
than "rhetoric" that only the "fervent" would take seriously. The Times
writers all but thrill to the lying, as in recounting the new president's
response to advisers who warned him against sticking to his campaign
promises on Guantanamo prisoners: "The deft insertion of some wiggle words
in the president's order showed that the advice was followed."

How telling that reporters who might as well be PR flacks are so admiring of
the power of "wiggle words" to free a politician from accountability to the
voters who put him in office: "A few sharp-eyed observers inside and outside
the government understood what the public did not. Without showing his hand,
Mr. Obama had preserved three major policies-rendition, military commissions
and indefinite detention-that have been targets of human rights groups since
the 2001 terrorist attacks." 

The Obama answer to those human rights groups is the same as that offered by
George W. Bush: Get the Justice Department to say that anything goes. When
Obama wanted to kill "an American citizen, in a country with which the
United States was not at war, in secret and without the benefit of a trial,"
the Times tells us, "[t]he Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel
prepared a lengthy memo justifying that extraordinary step, asserting that
while the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of due process applied, it could be
satisfied by internal deliberations in the executive branch." Obama
approved, and two American citizens were assassinated, including Samir Khan,
who was not on any official list of targeted terrorists. "This is an easy
one," Obama told his chief of staff.

What makes such decisions particularly easy is that Obama does not have to
release any details of drone attacks or the legal rulings of the Office of
Legal Counsel (OLC) that justify the assassinations-exactly the practice
that Bush followed in regard to the OLC briefs that he cited for the
legality of his torture policy. Michael Hayden, a director of the CIA under
Bush and now an adviser to presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney, accurately
described the danger that this poses to a democratic society: "This program
rests on the personal legitimacy of the president, and that's not
sustainable. I have lived the life of someone taking action on the basis of
secret O.L.C. memos, and it ain't a good life. Democracies do not make war
on the basis of legal memos locked in a [Department of Justice] safe."

But imperial plutocracies do. 

 <http://www.truthdig.com/greatamerican>        

Click  <http://www.truthdig.com/greatamerican> here to check out Robert
Scheer's new book,
"The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats
Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street." 

Keep up with Robert Scheer's latest columns, interviews, tour dates and more
at www.truthdig.com/robert_scheer.

 
 
 From: michael seeley [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 5:03 PM


Hi Ed -- hope u can forward this, at least to Valley folks and other
prospective donors.
thanks John Seeley, 310-435-7696 



        
Dear Friend 


We want to you to know that a peace candidate, history professor Michael
Powelson, is running for Congress here in the Valley's 30th District.

Dr. Powelson's campaign is centered on issues that are important to you both
as an educator and a citizen.

The mayhem inflicted on our educational system (and so many other social
services) has its deeper origins in Washington, where Congress has too long
been subservient to the powers of high finance (which set off this
recession) and the military-industrial complex (whose consumption of
trillions cripples a workable response to the economic crisis). 


Rather than going to needed social services, the majority of our tax dollars
are being used for insane military adventures. 


Both Democrats in the race, Berman and Sherman, have backed bank bailouts
and have been faithful and ardent supporters of all war spending -- breaking
ranks with most California Democrats in Congress, not to mention their
constituents . 

This needs to be stopped. The survival of our essential educational and
social institutions is under mortal threat.

For this reason we support Dr. Michael Powelson in his bid to provide an
alternative to the 2 incumbent war-enablers in the Valley Congressional
district.

In his speeches and grass roots networking, Powelson's underfunded campaign
has found a receptive audience. His message --when it gets heard --
resonates with public misgivings. 


There's still time to get the word out and build a substantial peace and
social justice vote that will register with legislators and push them in our
direction.
With Election Day around the corner Mike needs funds for a final mailer  --
it's in the  attachment if you'd like to look -- to reach younger voters and
disaffected Democrats who share our views and values. 

We hope you will join us in contributing whatever you can, either by check
to Powelson for Congress, 5852 Woodman Av., Van Nuys 91401, or (faster &
more effectively) by credit card/PayPal on the Web at
<http://michaelpowelsonforcongress.org/> michaelpowelsonforcongress.org 

Thanking you for being part of the real "hope and change." 


Sincerely, 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2171 / Virus Database: 2425/5037 - Release Date: 05/31/12



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to