Hi. I regret sending this incredible analysis at the tail end of a fun
holiday, but the US has joined the world and is in its most violent weather
in history. Gigantic fires in our great agricultural heartland, savage
hurricanes and storms alternating with unbearable, record heat throughout
half of the country (see today's NY Times headline story: "Unrelenting Heat
Wave Bakes All in Its Reach." Here, though we've largely escaped this
holocaust, prices for vegetables and fruit are at record heights because of
devastation of Florida et al agriculture, and we await a dearth of grain
from the middle west. In other words, we are, right now in life-threatening,
unpredictable, but rapidly worsening crisis. There is no rational denial;
only a desperate need to address the problem, as David Suzuki so powerfully
does here. -Ed
 
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/6/25/david_suzuki_on_rio_20_green
 
David Suzuki on Rio+20, "Green Economy" & Why Planet's Survival Requires
Undoing Its Economic Model

"Children, to grow up to be fully formed and developed human beings, need
love at very critical times in our development. If you look at children that
grow up under very war-torn conditions, in genocide or terrorism, and seeing
children deprived of love, are fundamentally crippled physically and
psychically. Well that means then that we need to work toward creating
strong families and supportive communities. We need full employment, we need
equity and justice and freedom from war, terror, and genocide. To me, those
are my issues, because if you don't have that kind of society, you cannot
have a sustainable environment. Hunger and poverty are my issues, because a
starving person who finds an edible plant or animal, is not going to say, I
wonder if this is an endangered species? They kill it and eat it. I would.
And you probably you would too." 

"So we've got to deal with these issues and then we say, we're spiritual
beings and as spiritual animals, we need to understand that we're part of
nature. That we emerge from nature and we return to it when we die. That
there are forces out there that we will never understand or control. We need
sacred places. To me, those are what we construct as a foundation of the way
that we live. And then we say, how can we create an economy that will allow
these fundamental needs that we have to be protected? How do we construct a
way of living as a species, protecting these values? But if we don't see
what the primary needs are, then I just think that we're just playing at the
edges and we're not being serious about reaching a truly sustainable
future." 

Guest:

David  <http://www.democracynow.org/appearances/david_suzuki> Suzuki,
Canadian author and environmental activist, perhaps best known as host of
the long-running CBC program, "The Nature of Things," seen in more than 40
countries. In 1990, he co-founded the David Suzuki Foundation which focuses
on sustainable ecology. In 2009, he was awarded the Right Livelihood Award.
His latest book is called, "Everything Under the Sun: Toward a Brighter
Future on a Small Blue Planet."

AMY GOODMAN: The U.N. conference on sustainable on sustainable development
known as the Rio+20 Earth Summit has concluded with few successes to report.
Negotiators unveiled an agreement that sets new development goals and lays
the groundwork for future talks. Many groups working on environmental and
poverty issues have criticized the agreement for being too weak. Greenpeace
called it "An epic failure." Politicians such as Nick Clegg of Britain
called "insipid," and some protesters protested final text by ripping it up
and renaming the summit "Rio minus 20." The gathering came 20 years after
the 1992 U.N. Earth Summit in Rio when leaders pledged to protect the planet
by endorsing treaties on biodiversity and climate change. At that meeting, a
12-year-old Canadian girl named Severn Cullis-Suzuki made a riveting plea to
world leaders.

SEVERN CULLIS-SUZUKI: My dad always says, you are what you do, not what you
say. Well, what you do makes me cry at night. You grown-ups say you love us,
but I challenge you, please, make your actions reflect your words. Thank
you.

AMY GOODMAN: Severn Cullis-Suzuki, then the age of 12, delivering her famous
address at the 1992 first Earth U.N. Earth Summit that took place in Rio.
Two decades later, Severn was back in Rio, this time as a veteran
international environmental campaigner and mother of two. Democracy Now!
spoke to her from Rio on Friday and asked her about what progress had been
made since 1992.

SEVERN CULLIS-SUZUKI: 20 years have passed and everybody wants to know, what
have we done? How have we progressed? Well, last week, scientists released a
report in the academic journal, Nature, that suggested that we are pushing
for a tipping point in the earth's biosphere, that we are attacking our
ecosystems that sustain us and all life on this earth in so many ways and
levels that we are pushing for a state shift like what was seen 12,000 years
ago with the end of the last ice age, but this time it will be human-caused
and it will be order of magnitude faster than the 1000-year transition that
happened last time. I mean, that report released on the eve of this world
summit is clear that we have not achieved the sustainable world we knew we
needed 20 years ago.

AMY GOODMAN: Severn Cullis-Suzuki, now mother of two. She delivered the
famous Rio address in 1992 at the age of 12. Today we bring you our
interview with Severn's father, David Suzuki, one of Canada's leading
environmentalists. We spoke to him just after speaking with Severn. He is
perhaps best known as host of the long-running CBC program, The nature of
things, see in over 40 countries. In 2009 David Suzuki was awarded the Right
Livelihood Award. His latest book is, "Everything Under the Sun: Toward a
Brighter Future on a Small Blue Planet." I began by asking David Suzuki if
anything has changed since his daughter delivered that famous address 20
years ago.

DAVID SUZUKI: Absolutely not. We're going backwards. Certainly from the
standpoint of my country, Canada, said that it was playing a leadership role
at Rio '92. Here there's just been no question, Canada is a laggard. We are
a global outlaw, renegade country. But, overall, the science is in, the
planet is in terrible shape. The difficulty is that meetings like this are
doomed to fail because we see ourselves at the center of everything. And our
political and our economic priorities have to dominate over everything else.
If we do not come to gather and say, look, let's start with the agreement
that we are biological creatures, and if you do not have air for more than
three or four minutes you are dead, if you don't have clean air you are
sick, so surely, air, the atmosphere that provides us with the seasons, the
weather, the climate, that has to be our highest priority before anything
economic or political. That has to be the highest priority. But what you're
getting is a huge gathering, as we saw in Copenhagen two years ago, a huge
gathering of countries trying to negotiate something that does not belong to
anyone to through the lenses of all of the political boundaries and economic
priorities, and we try to shoehorn nature into our agenda. It simply is not
going to work. A meeting like this is doomed to fail because we haven't left
our vested interests outside the door and come together as a single species
and agreed what the fundamental needs are for all of humanity. So we're
going to sacrifice the air, the water, the biodiversity all in the sake of
human political and economic interest. They're doomed to.

AMY GOODMAN: David Suzuki, in 2008, you urged McGill University students to
speak out against politicians who fail to act on climate change and said
"What I would challenge you to do is put a lot of effort into trying to see
whether there is a legal way of throwing our so-called leaders into jail
because what they're doing is a criminal act." Do you still feel the same
way today? What exactly are the crimes being committed?

DAVID SUZUKI: Absolutely. Absolutely. You can charge people who are at a
scene, where someone is being murdered, and if you do not do anything to try
to help that, you can be charged with criminal negligence. If something is
going on that you should know about and you ignore it deliberately, then
that is called willful blindness. That is a legal category for taking people
to court. I think what we have to also find is a mechanism to judge people
and to make them accountable for the implications of what they do or do not
do for future generations. That is, there should be a category of
intergenerational crime. You come here 20 years later, how many of the
political leaders that were here in 1992 are now here again? Very, very few,
if any. So, these guys come, they make a lot of nice words and they say, we
care about this, we're going to do that. Nobody holds them accountable
because they go out of office, they go on to become billionaires or whenever
they do. But who is accountable for the lack of any kind of profound
activity?

AMY GOODMAN: When Democracy Now! was at the U.N. Climate Change conference
in Durban this past December, I spoke with Marc Morano who published Climate
Depot, a climate website run by climate denier group, Committee for
Constructive Tomorrow. I asked him about President Obama's record on climate
change. This is what he said.

MARC MORANO: His nickname is George W. Obama. Obama's negotiator, Todd
Stern, will be here today. They have kept the exact same principles and
negotiating stance as President George Bush did for eight years. Obama has
carried on Bush's legacy. So as skeptics, we tip our hat into President
Obama in helping crush and continue to defeat the United Nations process.
Obama has been a great friend of global warming skeptics at these
conferences. Obama has problems for us because he is going through the EPA
regulatory process, which is a grave threat. But, in terms of this,
President Obama could not have turned out better when it came to his lack of
interest in a congressional climate bill and his lack of interest in the
United Nations Kyoto Protocol. So, a job well done for President Obama.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Marc Morano of the climate denier group Committe for a
Constructive Tomorrow saying President Obama is basically their best ally,
calling him George W. Obama. Do you share that assessment, David Suzuki?

DAVID SUZUKI: You know, Obama signaled sea-change in the American politics
in the United States. Unfortunately, he's held hostage and he made some
fundamental opponents right from the beginning that were fantastic, really
top-notch scientists heading NOAA, heading the Energy Department. This was a
sea-change. You think of a Nobel Prize winner being appointed the. These are
huge changes. The reality though, is he is held hostage by an absolutely
dysfunctional congress. And he is held hostage by the corporate agenda,
which is still a primary obligation that politicians have, even though has
been very successful at getting that grassroots support. The fact is that
corporations hold a huge hammer over the heads of our elected
representatives and they are calling the shots. The economic system is the
driving force that is destroying the planet, but now it is the corporations
that are setting the direction and they're calling the shots. I think that
it is not that Mr. Obama is like George Bush, because he is definitely not,
but he is held hostage by the same system within which Bush operated.

AMY GOODMAN: I want ask about the Canada Keystone XL pipeline. Just two
months after President Obama rejected the project after mass protests where
more than 1200 people were arrested around the White House last summer, he
announced his support for TransCanada to build the southern leg of the
pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas. In his remarks, President Obama said his
administration has authorized enough gas pipelines to encircle the earth.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: There is a bottleneck right here because we cannot get
enough of the oil to our refineries fast enough. If we could, then we would
be able to increase our oil supplies at a time when they are needed as much
as possible. Right now, a company called TransCanada has applied to build a
new pipeline to speed more oil from Cushing to state-of-the-art refineries
down in the Gulf coast. Today, I'm directing my Administration to cut
through the red tape, break through the bureaucratic hurdles, and make this
project a priority to go ahead and get it done.

AMY GOODMAN: TransCanada has reapplied for a permit to build a 1,200 mile
segment from Alberta, Canada to Steel City, Nebraska, just this past Friday,
the U.S. State Department said it would conduct a new environmental impact
statement on the Keystone XL pipeline. Talk about the significance of the
project, the role of activists in stopping it, then President Obama being
slammed afterwards. Republicans in congress said it would pass legislation
in Congress because he, in a very poor economy, was stopping people from
getting jobs to build it. David Suzuki, your answer to jobs versus the
environment.

DAVID SUZUKI: That has always been the dichotomy that's thrown up. But we
have not looked at the real job opportunities that lie from taking a
completely different direction. Obama's statement shows that he is a captive
of the oil industry as are most governments on this planet. He had an
opportunity to really offer Americans the real job creator, which is in
renewable, sustainable energy, greater energy efficiency, getting us off the
oil addiction that we have. It is going to run out. It's going to run out.
We are going to more and more extreme sources of energy. This is the moment
that we should create the opportunity to go down a different path.

I just came back from Japan where they had an absolute disaster that was an
opportunity. They have shut down every single one of the 54 nuclear plants
they have. They have an opportunity to take a totally different path.
Japanese people cut their energy use by 25% immediately after Fukushima.
They showed there was huge opportunity there. Instead, the government simply
wants to get those plants up and running again. The nuclear industry, the
fossil fuel industry have an enormous hammer over our elected
representatives and it really is up to civil society.

I think in the U.S., you're in deep trouble right now because of the huge
support for parties that want to take us back to the past, the Tea Party and
all of that are taking us away from having an opportunity for civil society
to really contribute. I think we are really in a crisis when Sir Martin
Rees, one of the leading scientists in Britain, the Royal Astronomer, was
asked on BBC, what are the chances that human beings will survive to the end
of this century? This is whether we will still be around. His answer was,
50/50. 50/50 that human beings will avoid extinction? I mean, we ought to be
on an absolute crisis mode and getting off all of this rhetoric being
fostered by the fossil fuel industry and nuclear industry and get on to a
truly sustainable path.

AMY GOODMAN: On Wednesday, French President Francois Hollande held a brief
news conference and said he saw in green economy a path to overcome the
economic crisis.

FRANCOIS HOLLANDE: Some people say there's an economic and financial crisis
and therefore the issues related to the environment and sustainable
development may be set aside and may be treated separately, and that there
would not be much pressure. This is not how I reason. I believe that the
lasting development, the environment, which will also call green economy, is
also a means of overcoming the crisis.

AMY GOODMAN: That's the new French president, a Socialist, Francois
Hollande, speaking at Rio+20. David Suzuki, to you feel there is a
counterweight to the corporations and the climate change deniers?

DAVID SUZUKI: The green economy will simply allow the corporations to make a
shift. You can see it in Exxon. Exxon, one of the companies that have spent
tens of millions of dollars denying climate change, denying any
responsibility, taking government subsidies on a massive scale, now their
ads are all about, we want a clean future, we're looking at clean energy and
all that stuff. Sure, the green economy is just about being more efficient,
being less polluting, being less energy intensive, but still it's a system
built on the need to continue to expand and grow. The true economy has got
to come back into balance with the very biosphere that sustains us. I think
a lot of people just see the green economy as a different way of allowing
the corporate agenda to continue to flourish.

We have got to change the economy and we have to do what we did in 1944 when
governments came to Bretton Woods in Maine, and said we have got to develop
an economic system for a post-war world. And they designed, they instituted
GATT, the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade. They invented the World
Bank, the IMF. They tied world currency to the American greenback. But they
left out the environment. It's time for a Bretton Woods II. We have got to
overhaul the economy. You cannot change nature, but you can change our
inventions like corporations and the economy. They have got to change. So,
greening the economy that is itself a totally destructive system because it
is bent on exploiting resources unsustainably and growing forever, that is
got to be overhauled, it doesn't work.

AMY GOODMAN: Leading Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki. We will
continue our interview Canada's environmentalist just after our break. You
can visit www.democracynow.org for in-depth coverage of Rio+20.

AMY GOODMAN: The Rio+20 Earth Summit has concluded. We're returning to our
conversation with Canada's leading environmentalist David Suzuki. I spoke to
him about the largest U.N. conference ever and asked him about his own
family background and how he became the renowned environmentalist he is
today.

DAVID SUZUKI: I was born in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1936. My mother
and father were born in Vancouver in 1909 and 1911. I am what Japanese call
a third generation Canadian. My mother and father had never been out of
Canada. They were citizens all their lives. They could not vote until after
World War II. When World War II happened, although we were full Canadians by
birth, we were regarded as enemy aliens as were Japanese Americans. We were
incarcerated in camps. And then as the war was coming to an end, we were
told that we had two choices, we could sign up and get a one-way ticket to
Japan, which for us was a foreign country, or get out of British Columbia
and go east to the Rockies. Because we only knew Canada, we went east to the
Rockies and I ended up in Ontario.

After the war, my parents said the way out of our poverty was hard work and
education. Fortunately, both of those things were possible for me. And then
at very amazing thing happened. I was offered a scholarship from an American
college that was worth more than my father earned in a year. In 1954,
Amherst College in Massachusetts offered me a scholarship for $1,500 because
Amherst believed that foreign students added to the education of American
students, and they were willing to pay money to have a foreign student come
and be part of that college. For me, Amherst College made me as a scholar
and I'm ever grateful to the United States for that.

In 1957 when I was entering my last year in college at Amherst, on October
4th, the Soviet Union launched Sputnik. We had no idea there was a space
program. In the months that followed, we saw the American rockets takeoff
and explode either on the launching pad or once they got into the air they
exploded. Meanwhile, the Soviets launched the first animal, a dog, Laika,
the first man in space, Yuri Gagarin, the first team of cosmonauts, the
first woman, Valentina Tereshkova. Americans realized, holy cow, the Soviets
are very advanced in science and technology. They did not roll over and say,
my God, they've got to big a lead, we can't afford to do this, it will
destroy the economy. They simply said, we have got to go and beat these
guys. Even though I was a Canadian, living in the states at the time, all
you had to do was say, I love science, and Americans just supported you,
threw you into universities, and I got a graduate education and training
that I could never have gotten in Canada.

Well, what happened, Kennedy declared a race to the moon. Americans are not
only the first and only country to reach the moon, but think of all of the
spinoffs, the unexpected spinoffs that came from that commitment to beat the
Russians. I mean you've got 24-a-day newscasts. Well, maybe that is not such
a great thing. But, you've got GPS, you've got cellphones, all of the things
that came about simply because America said, we've got to make the
commitment and we've got to beat the Russians to the moon. And it doesn't
make sense to me that there is all this sense of, oh my God, we can't get
off fossil fuels, it will destroy the economy. This is not the American way.
The American way is to meet that challenge and realize huge things will
happen once we make the commitment. We can't anticipate. Certainly in solar
panels, certainly in geothermal energy, there are huge opportunities. The
America that I knew and loved would have said, this is a challenge, American
know-how will lead the world and create jobs at the same time. So, I'm
astounded at the position the United States is in today compared to what it
was like when I graduated from Amherst College.

AMY GOODMAN: David Suzuki, I wanted to ask about the mass student protests
that have been taking place in Quebec province. You wrote in a recent piece,
governments all across Canada have no qualms about investing vast amounts of
money to exploit natural resources yet they all but ignored the most
precious - our children. In the U.S., there is very little written about or
very little coverage of these mass student protests that have been taking
place, some of the largest in Canada. Talk about what you see has to happen.

DAVID SUZUKI: Quebec is a very, very different society. I am very proud that
they have remained in Canada. They reflect a great deal of value difference
so that the environment, for example on Environment Day this year, attracted
300,000 people on the streets of Montreal for Earth day. They attracted over
100,000 people objecting to the student tuition increase. Now the English
press in Canada has portrayed this as, these spoiled brats in Quebec, they
don't realize they've got cheapest tuition in all of Canada and they are
objecting to a few hundred dollars tuition raise. No, that is not what it is
about. They're saying they'd like to look to countries like the Scandinavian
countries, even France, where young people are regarded as the most precious
commodity, where they are supported and their universities are free if they
reach a certain level of ability. They're supported through the system, and
that is what the Quebecois are trying to tell us. But no, we portray this as
spoiled kids that don't want to spend any more money. I do not think that is
what it is. But of course Charest, the Premier, who in some areas is quite
progressive in the environment, for example, but Charest has brought in
really very severe draconian legislation to suppress this kind of public
dissent. And now that is what's attracting more kids to the streets to say,
this is not a civil society any longer when you suppress us in that way.
What underlies a student protest is a very profound question about, what are
our values in our society?

AMY GOODMAN: David Suzuki, your long-running show CBC show, called The
Nature of Things, explores environmental diversity of the planet. Can you
talk about some of the experiences and discoveries that have had the most
impact on you? And in these last few minutes, because climate change is so
little addressed while weather is increasingly on every channel and is as
extreme weather, severe weather, the other two words, global warming, rarely
flash, if ever, on the networks. Can you talk about what is at stake for
people to even understand - since in the U.S., it's even a debate given the
amount of money oil companies pour into the global warming denier groups -
it's even a debate whether in fact this really is a concern.

DAVID SUZUKI: It's astonishing to me because I want to remind your viewers
that in 1992, an American president had declared himself - well, in 1988, he
said, if you vote for me, I promise I will be an environmental President.
That was George H.W. Bush. There wasn't a green bone in his body but the
American public had put the environment at the top of its agenda. He had to
say that. Many people say, George Bush came to Rio in 1992 so he should be
recognized for that. George Bush was not going to come to Rio unless they
watered down the climate convention. They were aiming at the original plans,
were for a 20% reduction in greenhouse emissions in 15 years. George Bush
said, I am not going, until he got a much watered-down target of
stabilization of 1990 levels by the year 2000, and he came down and signed
that. But, his actions were predicated on American concern about the
environment. Since then, of course, we have gone into recessions. But, I
think we have not recognized that we've got people like the Koch brothers,
you got these right-wing think tanks, Competitive Enterprises Institute, the
Heartland Institute, the Heritage Institute, that are all now pushing a
radical right-wing agenda funded by fossil fuel industry and rich people to
say, this is not true. Which is undermining scientific credibility.

June 7, this year, Nature is filled with articles from scientists who have
looked at the ecosystems of the planet. We are in deep trouble. We are
facing an absolute crisis now. But countries like Canada and the United
States, which are endowed with huge resources, can float by on the
assumption everything is OK. We don't see the crunch coming as poor
countries like [in] Europe are seeing. They do not have the kind of resource
plenty that we have in North America. And so they are seeing it and leading
the call for change. But, we have the illusion that the economy is the
source of everything that matters and we have got to keep that growing at
all costs. It's at all costs to the future for our children and
grandchildren.

AMY GOODMAN: Speaking of children and grandchildren, in 1992, David Suzuki,
you were in Rio with your daughter Severn Cullis-Suzuki who was then 12, who
gave this remarkable address to the Rio summit, the first Earth Summit.

SEVERN CULLIS-SUZUKI: You don't know how to bring the salmon back up a dead
stream. You don't know how to bring back an animal, now extinct. And you
can't bring back the forest that once grew where there is now a desert. If
you do not know how to fix it, please, stop breaking it.

AMY GOODMAN: That was Severn Suzuki, David, that was your daughter. It is 20
years later and you are now back in Rio with Severn, who is now Severn
Cullis-Suzuki, with your grandchildren her two sons. Can you talk about what
it meant to you, for her to give that address 20 years ago and where you see
we are now?

DAVID SUZUKI: Well, it was a remarkable speech, and at the end of her talk,
she got a standing ovation. She went back to sit with us. Al Gore came up
and said, that's the best speech anyone has given at this conference. The
power of her speech - which, by the way, she and the other kids together
wrote. Her mom and I didn't have any input. She said, dad, I know what I
want to say, I want you to tell me how to say it. But, she wrote that
speech, and a child speaks from the heart. You know that there is no hidden
agenda. They just speak in that child-like way of innocence. That was the
power - her words had power because they came from that kind of innocence.

Now she's back. She's brought her youngest son. The only reason I'm here is
because I said, Sev, I don't believe these conferences achieve anything but
I will go as your baby sitter and I am here as the baby sitter. You just
happened to corral me because I'm here looking after the baby - I've got to
get back and take care of my grandson. But, I can tell you, she feels
unbelievably desperate because she says the problem is that we have got to
break down in-governance. Leaders came in 1992. They were moved by a child's
plea, a child's request to do something for her future, and now those
leaders aren't here and there is no one accountable for the fact they have
failed fundamentally. Now there is a new set of leaders and they're making
the same kind of promises without any understanding of the urgency of the
crisis we face. So she comes to this with a - from a very dark place. By the
disillusionment of her child-like belief that our leaders will truly lead
and care about a future for her children. Now she has got an investment into
the future in that makes her even more desperate about the lack of
governance.

AMY GOODMAN: David, talking about taking care of your grandson. If you were
in charge, if he could have anything accomplished right now, what are the
steps that you feel are most important to take right now?

DAVID SUZUKI: Well, the thing we hear over and over again is that we need a
paradigm shift. It has become a cliche. But, I absolutely believe this is a
critical change, that all of the stuff that goes on will not achieve
anything unless we ultimately see the world in a different way. You see, our
beliefs, our values shape the way we look out at the world and the way we
treat it. If we believe that we were here, placed here by God, that all of
this creation is for us, it's for us to go and occupy, dominate, and
exploit, then we will proceed to do that. That is the paradigm we now exist
within. We're driven then by that sense that it's all there for us. We need
to shift that to a better understanding that we are part of a vast web of
interconnected species, that it is the biosphere, the zone of air, water,
and land, where all life exists. It's a very thin layer around the planet.

Carl Sagan told us that if you shrink the earth to the size of a basketball,
the biosphere, the zone of air, water and land where all life exists, would
be thinner than a layer of Saran Wrap, and that's it. That's our home, but
it's home to ten to thirty millions other species that keep the planet
habitable. And if we don't see the that we are utterly imbedded in the
natural world and dependent on nature, not technology, not economics, not
science - we are dependent on Mother Nature for our very well being and
survival. If we don't see that, then our priorities will continue to be
driven by man-made constructs like national borders, economies,
corporations, markets. Those are all human created things. They shouldn't
dominate the way we live. It should be the biosphere. And the leaders in
that should be the indigenous people who still have that sense, that the
earth is truly are mother, that it gives birth to us. You don't treat your
mother the way we treat the planet or the biosphere today. If we do not make
that fundamental shift, then we will just go on, oh we got to be more
efficient we got to have a green economy, and all that stuff, but we haven't
fundamentally changed in our relationship with the biosphere.

AMY GOODMAN: And if we do treat it in that way, what needs to happen?

DAVID SUZUKI: Well, I think then we have to reassess everything. I believe
we have to start with the fundamental understanding that we are animals.
Believe me, I have said that in many parts of the United States, and people
get mighty pissed off when I tell children, don't forget we're animals. They
say, don't call my daughter an animal, we're human beings. We don't even
want to accept it our biological nature. But, as animals our absolutely
highest need for survival and well being is clean air, clean water, clean
soil that gives us our food, and energy from the sun that plants captured by
photosynthesis. That's what we depend on. So, how could we, claiming to be
intelligent, use air, water, and soil as a garbage can for our waist and the
most toxic chemicals ever known on the planet as if somehow that's not going
to have consequences. The minute you except that we are biological
creatures, then our highest priorities become absolutely clear. That means
stop all release of any kind of human created material into our surroundings
until we learn ways to recycle that in mimic nature in how we create and
then degrade those things. Then we have to say we are social animals; and as
social animals, what is our most fundamental need? To me, this was shocking
when I began to read the scientific literature. The most important thing we
need is love.

Children, to grow up to be fully formed and developed human beings, need
love at very critical times in our development. If you look at children that
grow up under very war torn conditions, in genocide or terrorism, and seeing
children deprived of love, are fundamentally crippled physically and
psychically. Well that means then that we need to work toward creating
strong families and supportive communities. We need full employment, we need
equity and justice and freedom from war, terror, and genocide. To me, those
are my issues, because if you don't have that kind of society, you cannot
have a sustainable environment. Hunger and poverty are my issues, because a
starving person who finds an edible plant or animal, is not going to say, I
wonder if this is an endangered species? They kill it and eat it. I would.
And you probably you would too.

So we've got to deal with these issues and then we say, we're spiritual
beings and as spiritual animals, we need to understand that we're part of
nature. That we emerge from nature and we return to it when we die. That
there are forces out there that we will never understand or control. We need
sacred places. To me, those are what we construct as a foundation of the way
that we live. And then we say, how can we create an economy that will allow
these fundamental needs that we have to be protected? How dow we construct a
way of living as a species, protecting these values? But if we don't see
what the primary needs are, then I just think that we're just playing at the
edges and we're not being serious about reaching a truly sustainable future.

AMY GOODMAN: That was David Suzuki, speaking from the Rio+20 Earth Summit in
Brazil just before it concluded on Friday. More than 120 world leaders
attended. Greenpeace called the summit an epic failure. David Suzuki is a
Canadian author and environmentalist, best known for the long-running CBC
program, The nature of Things and his latest book is, Everything Under the
Sun: Toward a Brighter Future on a Small Blue Planet. Speaking of Canadian
journalists and environmentalist, congratulations to Naomi Klein and Avi
Lewis on the birth of their baby. Welcome to the world, Toma.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/> 
Version: 2012.0.2179 / Virus Database: 2437/5117 - Release Date: 07/07/12

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2179 / Virus Database: 2437/5117 - Release Date: 07/07/12



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to