Roundup: Everything You Need to Know About Chairman Ryan’s Budget

Below is a compilation of the CBPP analyses and blog posts on the budget that 
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan proposed, and the House of 
Representatives passed, in March. At the bottom of the compilation, we also 
list the Center's analysis of the Ryan "Roadmap" budget plan.

Overview/General

Blog post: Greenstein Statement
March 21, 2012 
“The new Ryan budget is a remarkable document — one that, for most of the past 
half-century, would have been outside the bounds of mainstream discussion due 
to its extreme nature. In essence, this budget is Robin Hood in reverse — on 
steroids. It would likely produce the largest redistribution of income from the 
bottom to the top in modern U.S. history and likely increase poverty and 
inequality more than any other budget in recent times (and possibly in the 
nation’s history).”
Full statement: Robert Greenstein, President, on Chairman Ryan's Budget Plan
Blog post: Unbalanced Deficit-Reduction Package Would Slash Funds to States and 
Localities 
August 8, 2012 
As we explain in a new analysis, a deficit-reduction plan that lacks 
significant revenues would almost certainly deeply cut federal funds that 
support states and localities as they educate children, build roads and 
bridges, protect public health, and provide law enforcement.
Analysis: Deficit-Reduction Package That Lacks Significant Revenues Would Shift 
Very Substantial Costs to States and Localities — Ryan Budget Cuts to State and 
Local Services Would Be Far Deeper than Cuts Under Sequestration
Blog post: Low-Income Programs Would Bear the Brunt of Ryan Cuts 
March 23, 2012 
The Ryan budget would get at least 62 percent of its $5.3 trillion in 
nondefense budget cuts over ten years (relative to a continuation of current 
policies) from programs that serve people of limited means.
Analysis: Chairman Ryan Gets 62 Percent of His Huge Budget Cuts from Programs 
for Lower-Income Americans


Blog post: House Budget Committee Votes to Break Budget Deal 
May 8, 2012 
The House Budget Committee approved legislation yesterday that would alter last 
summer’s bipartisan budget deal and enable Congress to set defense funding 
above the agreed-upon cap, while cutting deeply into various non-defense 
programs, particularly those for lower-income families, as we explain in two 
reports.
Analysis: House Budget Bills Would Target Programs for Lower-Income Families 
While Breaking Last Summer's Bipartisan Deal — Package Would Enable Defense 
Funds to Be Set Above Agreed-to Caps, While Non-Defense Discretionary Funds Are 
Cut Nearly As Much As Under Sequestration
Analysis: A Closer Look at Chairman Ryan's "Sequestration" Proposal
Blog post: Ryan Plan Unlikely to Balance the Budget for Decades 
March 28, 2012 
Despite its massive spending cuts, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s 
budget (which the House is considering this week) would still have a deficit of 
$287 billion in fiscal year 2022. And the Congressional Budget Office estimates 
that it wouldn’t produce a surplus until 2040.
Analysis: Chairman Ryan Gets 62 Percent of His Huge Budget Cuts from Programs 
for Lower-Income Americans
Blog post: When Is a Deal Not a Deal? 
March 22, 2012 
With defense funding well above the Budget Control Act’s funding caps in coming 
years, and non-defense discretionary funding very far below those caps, the 
Ryan budget bears little resemblance to the bipartisan agreement reached last 
summer.


Blog post: Who Really Punted on Pell? 
April 27, 2012 
Pell Grants to help students from low-income families pay for college face a 
$58 billion shortfall over the next decade — even though the Congressional 
Budget Office says the program’s costs will remain flat during that period — 
because the way Congress has funded them in recent years has made the costs 
appear artificially low.
Analysis: President's Budget Would Reduce Pell Grant Shortfall; Ryan Budget 
Would Nearly Triple It
Blog post: A First Look at the Ryan Budget: Squeezing Government Over Time 
March 20, 2012 
The Ryan budget specifies a long-term spending path under which, by 2050, most 
of the federal government aside from Social Security, health care, and defense 
would cease to exist.
Analysis: CBO Shows Ryan Budget Would Set Nation on Path to End Most of 
Government Other Than Social Security, Health Care, and Defense By 2050
Video: Robert Greenstein and Paul Ryan discuss taxes and the economy at the 
National Fiscal Summit of the Peter Peterson Foundation.
Taxes

Blog post: Thinking About Tax Policy, Part 4: Ryan Plan a Costly Step in the 
Wrong Direction 
April 13, 2012 
This series has explained why we need to raise more revenue and why it makes 
sense to start at the top of the income scale. The budget from House Budget 
Committee Chairman Paul Ryan goes in exactly the opposite direction — it would 
cut taxes deeply at the top and raise even less revenue than if we continued 
all of President Bush’s tax cuts, leading to bigger deficits and worse income 
inequality.
Analysis: New Tax Cuts in Ryan Budget Would Give Millionaires $265,000 on Top 
of Bush Tax Cuts


Blog post: Ryan Budget Would Raise Some Taxes; Guess Who Gets Hit? 
April 12, 2012 
You’ve undoubtedly heard lots about how House Budget Committee Chairman Paul 
Ryan’s budget plan would give millionaires an average $265,000 apiece in new 
tax cuts, on top of the $129,000 apiece they would get from Ryan’s call to 
extend President Bush’s tax cuts. Have you also heard, however, that he wants 
to raise taxes for some other Americans? Want to guess who would bear the brunt 
of his tax hikes?
Analysis: New Tax Cuts in Ryan Budget Would Give Millionaires $265,000 on Top 
of Bush Tax Cuts
Analysis: Ryan Budget Would Slash SNAP Funding by $134 Billion Over Ten Years — 
Low-Income Households in All States Would Feel Sharp Effects
Blog post: Myths on Spending, Debt, and Taxes Fuel Ryan Vision 
April 5, 2012 
Chad Stone: In my post for US News & World Report, I identify three myths about 
spending, debt, and taxes that conservative politicians use to justify the plan 
of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan -- one that would set the nation 
on a path to end most of government other than Social Security, health care, 
and defense by 2050.
Analysis: Ryan Budget's Claim to Finance Its Tax Cuts for the Wealthy By 
Curbing Their Tax Breaks Does Not Withstand Scrutiny 
March 22, 2012 
Despite warning that the nation faces the “perils of debt,” Chairman Ryan 
introduced a budget on March 20 whose tax proposals would be extremely costly 
and would disproportionately favor the nation’s highest-income households and 
large corporations.
Blog post: Chairman Ryan’s Misleading Chart 
March 27, 2012 
The lead tax chart in Chairman Ryan’s budget...gives the impression that we can 
easily eliminate tax expenditures for the very wealthy and thereby pay for 
lower rates for all taxpayers — including the Ryan plan’s big reduction, to 25 
percent, in the top income tax rate. The chart in question is based on data 
from the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center (TPC). But it does not show what 
Chairman Ryan suggests it does, for two key reasons.
Health Care

Blog post: Lower Drug Costs Don’t Support Ryan Medicare Proposal 
May 15, 2012 
We’ve updated and expanded our 2011 analysis of why the Medicare Part D drug 
benefit, which private insurers deliver, has cost much less than the Medicare 
trustees and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) originally expected.
Analysis: Lower-Than-Expected Medicare Drug Costs Mostly Reflect Lower 
Enrollment and Slowing of Overall Drug Spending, Not Reliance on Private Plans
Blog post: What If Chairman Ryan’s Medicaid Block Grant Were Already in Effect? 
April 23, 2012 
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s proposal to block-grant Medicaid 
would cut federal funding by one-third by 2022 and even more after that, we 
recently explained. To help show how states would likely fare under the 
proposal over time, we compared how much federal funding they would have 
received under the block grant if it had been in effect for fiscal years 
2001-2010 to what they actually received (excluding the temporary funding 
increases that the White House and Congress provided during the last two 
recessions).
Analysis: Ryan Medicaid Block Grant Would Cut Medicaid by One-Third by 2022 and 
More After That
Analysis: What if Chairman Ryan’s Medicaid Block Grant Had Taken Effect in 
2001? Federal Medicaid Funds Would Have Fallen by 35 Percent or More in Most 
States, by Half in Some, by 2010
Blog post: Ryan Budget Would Make Big Changes in Medicare 
March 29, 2012 
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s new budget provides much less 
detail than last year’s about his proposals in Medicare and other areas — too 
little for the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to estimate their impact, as 
Brookings economist William Gale points out. (CBO estimated that Chairman 
Ryan’s Medicare proposals last year would have driven up total health care 
spending and doubled the out-of-pocket costs of a typical 65-year-old.)
Analysis: Medicare in the Ryan Budget
Analysis: Ryan Medicaid Block Grant Would Cut Medicaid by One-Third by 2022 and 
More After That 
March 27, 2012 
The Medicaid block-grant proposal in the Ryan budget that the House of 
Representatives will vote on this week would cut federal Medicaid funding by 34 
percent by 2022 (on top of repealing the health reform law’s Medicaid 
expansion) because the funding would no longer keep pace with health care costs 
or with expected Medicaid enrollment growth as the population ages and 
employer-based health insurance continues to erode.
Blog post: Chairman Ryan and the Medicare Part D Myth 
March 21, 2012 
Chairman Ryan claims that his troubling proposal to convert Medicare into a 
premium support system would control costs and notes that the Medicare Part D 
drug benefit, which private insurers provide, has cost much less than the 
Congressional Budget Office expected. But Part D’s reliance on private plans 
had nothing to do with its lower-than-expected costs.
Analysis: Lower-Than-Expected Medicare Drug Costs Reflect Decline in Overall 
Drug Spending and Lower Enrollment, Not Private Plans — Evidence Shows Reliance 
on Private Insurers Actually Raised Medicare Costs

Blog post: Ryan’s Rx for Medicaid Would Add Millions to the Uninsured and 
Underinsured 
March 20, 2012 
The Ryan budget proposes to radically restructure Medicaid by converting it 
into a block grant and to slash federal funding by about one-fifth over the 
next decade. All told, it would add tens of millions of Americans to the ranks 
of the uninsured and underinsured.
Blog post: The Problems with the Ryan-Wyden Medicare Proposal 
March 19, 2012 
The Ryan-Wyden proposal would shift substantial costs to Medicare 
beneficiaries, likely lead to the gradual demise of traditional Medicare, and 
produce few budgetary savings.
Analysis: What You Need to Know About Premium Support
Analysis: Converting Medicare to Premium Support Would Likely Lead to Two-Tier 
Health Care System
Analysis: Medicare Is Not “Bankrupt” — Health Reform Has Improved Program’s 
Financing
Safety Net

Blog post: The Massive Hidden Safety-Net Cuts in Chairman Ryan’s Budget 
March 21, 2012 
A key misunderstood element of the Ryan budget is its proposed cut in spending 
for non-discretionary programs other than Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, 
and other health programs. There is no way to generate the budget’s required 
savings without extremely severe cuts in these programs, on which the most 
vulnerable Americans depend.
Blog post: Ryan Budget Takes Big Bite out of Food Stamps w/state data 
March 22, 2012 
Millions of people would lose part or all of their SNAP (food stamp) benefits 
under the Ryan budget.
Analysis: Ryan Budget Would Slash SNAP Funding by $134 Billion Over Ten Years — 
Low-Income Households in All States Would Feel Sharp Effects
Blog post: Chairman Ryan’s Call for “Welfare Reform, Round Two” Ignores 
Inconvenient Facts About Round One
March 21, 2012 
Since a safety net is supposed to help people during times of economic need, 
the true measure of success is how it does during the worst of times, not the 
best of times. And, 15 years after Congress enacted welfare reform, we can see 
clearly that it is not the resounding success that Chairman Ryan claims.
Analysis: TANF Weakening as a Safety Net For Poor Families

Analysis of Ryan "Roadmap" Budget Plan of January 2010

The Ryan Budget's Radical Priorities — Provides Largest Tax Cuts in History for 
Wealthy, Raises Middle Class Taxes, Ends Guaranteed Medicare, Privatizes Social 
Security, Erodes Health Care The Roadmap would give the most affluent 
households a new round of very large, costly tax cuts by reducing income tax 
rates on high-income households; eliminating income taxes on capital gains, 
dividends, and interest; and abolishing the corporate income tax, the estate 
tax, and the alternative minimum tax. At the same time, the Ryan plan would 
raise taxes for most middle-income families, privatize a substantial portion of 
Social Security, eliminate the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health 
insurance, end traditional Medicare and most of Medicaid, and terminate the 
Children’s Health Insurance Program. The plan would replace these health 
programs wi th a system of vouchers whose value would erode over time and thus 
would purchase health insurance that would cover fewer health care services as 
the years went by.

Contact

Michelle Bazie
Vice President for Communications
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
820 First Street, NE, Suite 510
Washington, DC 20002
[email protected]


Resources

Support the Center's Work 












Preferences










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to