From: Sid Shniad <[email protected]> Aug 28 06:29PM -0700 * http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/28/rachel-corrie-dismissal-dangerou s-precedent?fb=optOut *
*The Guardian 28 August 2012 * *Rachel Corrie lawsuit result 'dangerous precedent' say human rights groups * *Concern ruling will allow Israel to exploit 'legal black hole' and avoid responsibility for its actions * <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/harrietsherwood> Harriet Sherwood <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/harrietsherwood>, Jerusalem correspondent Human rights organisations have warned of a "dangerous precedent" following an Israeli court's dismissal of a civil lawsuit over the death of US activist Rachel Corrie <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/rachel-corrie>, which stated that Israel <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/israel> could not be held responsible because its army was engaged in a combat operation. Corrie "was accidentally killed in the framework of a 'war-related activity' ... [and] the state bears no responsibility for the damages inflicted on the plaintiffs resulting from a war-related action," said Judge Oded Gershon at Haifa district court. The 23-year-old activist was crushed by a military bulldozer which she believed was intent on demolishing a Palestinian home in Rafah, southern Gaza, in March 2003. Gershon ruled that it was a "regrettable accident" that Corrie had brought upon herself. There had been no fault in the internal Israeli military investigation, which cleared the bulldozer driver of any blame, the court found. "The deceased was in a blind spot - the operator didn't see her," said Gershon. Corrie had "put herself in a dangerous situation" and could have saved herself by moving out of the zone of danger, he said. The area was "the site of daily warfare" and a closed military zone, and the US government had warned its citizens not to go there. Hussein Abu Hussein, the Corrie family's lawyer, said the ruling sent "a very dangerous message and precedent that there are no restrictions on Israeli military behaviour in Gaza and the West Bank". The ruling would "close the doors of justice to civilian victims", including foreigners, and "expand a legal black hole" in which Israel seeks to evade responsibility for its actions. The verdict, he said, was "yet another example of where impunity has prevailed over accountability and fairness. We knew from the beginning that we had an uphill battle to get truthful answers and justice, but we are convinced that this verdict distorts the strong evidence presented in court, and contradicts fundamental principles of international law with regard to protection of human rights defenders. In denying justice in Rachel Corrie's killing, this verdict speaks to the systemic failure to hold the Israeli military accountable for continuing violations of basic human rights." Human Rights Watch said the ruling contravened international law, which is intended to protect non-combatants in war zones, and set "a dangerous precedent". "The idea that there can be no fault for killing civilians in a combat operation flatly contradicts Israel's international legal obligations to spare civilians from harm during armed conflict and to credibly investigate and punish violations by its forces," said Bill van Esveld, a senior Middle East researcher at HRW. Shawan Jabarin, director of the Palestinian human rights organisation, Al Haq, said: "Israel has claimed that it is not responsible for the death of a civilian in armed conflict. However, this flatly ignores international law, which stipulates that Israel is under an obligation to take all measures to ensure that no civilians will be harmed during hostilities, and must at all times distinguish between military targets and civilians. "The presence of a civilian in a combat zone does in any way not affect their right to protection. Instead, their protected status applies regardless of their location in a conflict, and international law clearly states that they must be protected against acts of violence in all circumstances." Corrie's parents, Cindy and Craig, of Olympia, Washington State, sued the state of Israel, accusing it of the unlawful or intentional killing of their daughter or of gross negligence. The family was "deeply saddened and deeply troubled" by the ruling, Cindy Corrie said afterwards. "I believe this was a bad day, not only for our family, but for human rights, humanity, the rule of law and also for the country of Israel." The state, she said, "has worked extremely hard to make sure that the truth about what happened to my daughter is not known and those responsible will not be held accountable". The family will appeal to the supreme court. The Israeli justice ministry described Corrie's death as "a tragic accident". The bulldozer driver and his commander were "exonerated of any blame for negligence", it said in a statement. At the time of Corrie's death, house demolitions were common; part of an increasing cycle of violence from both sides. The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) said the homes it targeted were harbouring militants or weapons or being used to conceal arms-smuggling tunnels under the border. Human rights groups said the demolitions were collective punishment. Between 2000 and 2004, the Israeli military demolished 1,700 homes in Rafah, leaving about 17,000 people homeless, according to the Israeli human rights organisation B'Tselem. Corrie was one of a group of around eight international activists acting as human shields against the demolitions. Fellow activists said she was clearly within the line of sight of the bulldozer driver, who drove straight at her. Israel promised a "thorough, credible and transparent" investigation into her death. Within a month, an IDF internal inquiry had concluded that the driver of the bulldozer had not seen the activist and that no charges would be brought. During the Corries' civil lawsuit, which lasted almost two and a half years, the bulldozer driver testified anonymously from behind a screen for "security reasons". He insisted that the first time he saw the activist was when he "saw people pulling the body out from under the earth". His commanding officer, Colonel Pinhas Zuaretz, told the court that Rafah was a war zone in 2003 and said that "reasonable people would not be there unless they had aims of attacking our forces". Gaza versus the Warsaw Ghetto: Double Standards in Assessing <http://groups.google.com/group/sid-l/t/1d8ddbcc4e2bc2c8> Crimes against Humanity Sid Shniad <[email protected]> Aug 28 10:21AM -0700 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=32455> &aid=32455 Global Research <http://www.globalresearch.ca <http://www.globalresearch.ca/> > August 23, 2012 *Gaza versus the Warsaw Ghetto: Double Standards in Assessing Crimes against Humanity * * * *By Felicity Arbuthnot* "Do not hold the delusion that your advancement is accomplished by crushing others."(Marcus Tullius Cicero,106-43 B.C.) "The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality." (Dante, c1265-1321.) One of the haunting images of Jewish heroism, lauded in history books and Holocaust commemorations, is the courage of those, especially the young, in the Warsaw Ghetto, when in 1940, Jewish Warsaw residents were ordered by the German invaders into a small section of the city. The courage of those who dug tunnels, smuggled goods necessary for survival in, and communications in and out, has rightly become a legendary act of resistance and courage, defiance in the shadow of despotism and repression. The people of Gaza (roughly seventy five percent of whom are under twenty five) have had even the water in their natural springs stolen by a population to whom James Arthur Balfour's sparse words promised: "the establishment of a home in Palestine for the Jewish people ... it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine . " The Jewish families were contained in their enclave by an up to three metre high wall. The people of Gaza, ironically, are largely contained by a wall up to eleven metres high - twice the height of the Berlin Wall. The Palestinians, their lands, homes, even cemeteries, stolen and destroyed, their ancient olive groves - some trees a thousand years old - burned or stolen to grace often illegal settlements, their people spat at, imprisoned, tortured, bombed, walled in, is now also near land-locked by Israel's maritime aggression in Gaza's territorial waters. Even fishing, unfettered access to their bountiful fish stocks are often denied, threatened by gun boats. Gaza, since 2000 especially, has become a sunnier Warsaw Ghetto. Imports are strangulatingly controlled or totally prohibited by Israel, thus lifeline tunnels have also been dug between Gaza and Egypt. In the building of one such desperation-driven structure: "in the cold, often trapped and suffocating under water or collapsing walls of dirt and concrete, eighty two people died", working in shifts, twenty four hours a day, Hyam Noir and Fady Adwan write graphically. Goods brought through the tunnels, as in Nazi occupied Warsaw seventy years earlier, are life's necessities for survival and include medicines, food, clothes, vital spare parts, foreign currency. World governments either collude with this ongoing humanitarian tragedy and legal shame, or simply ignore Gaza's plight. That Balfour stated clearly that the Jewish people were to be guests in Palestine, not jailers and conquerors, has been ignored from literally, day one. For building their subterranean mainstay, the rightful residents of Palestine are called terrorists. Shame on every politician, of any country who colludes with, or ignores this ongoing obscenity. _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5227 - Release Date: 08/27/12 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
