Six Songs for Labor
From: James H. Williams Labor Day 2010 Mayn Rue Platz By Morris Rosenfeld sung by June Tabor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjpEJ-X2WsU <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjpEJ-X2WsU&feature=related> &feature=related Millworker by James Taylor. Sung by Bruce Springsteen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lNNMb_7qcE Solidarity Forever by Ralph Chaplin Sung by UAW members at Ford Auto http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uTarc1si2fQ Part of the Union by the Strawbs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NniiRALdKU8 Labour Day song--the Nightwatchmen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH1UYpq-dRc <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qH1UYpq-dRc&feature=related> &feature=related Step by Step-Jackson Browne http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ay5POkIV7vI * * * http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1249860--walkom-happy-la bour-day-it-s-all-pretty-grim Happy Labour Day. It's all pretty grim Image <http://i.thestar.com/images/df/e5/c3e4e2994efc996734d62bf0140e.jpeg> By Thomas <http://www.thestar.com/columnist/94627--walkom-thomas> Walkom Toronto Star: August 31, 2012 Another grim Labour Day. The unions are under attack. The middle class is under attack. This is no coincidence. Unions are solidly middle-class institutions. True, their rhetoric may be radical. Labour militants still favour rousing songs from the 1930s, such as "Which Side Are You On." But in reality, unions are fundamentally conservative. Most today are not trying to break new ground. Instead, they are attempting to hold on - often desperately - to what they have. Indeed, unions have long been conservative. Nineteenth century unions were a reaction to industrialization, attempting to recreate a world in which skilled craftsmen could control the process of production and hang onto the fruits of their labour. It's no surprise then that unions still attempt to influence what are now commonly referred to as management prerogatives. The Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association, for instance, agreed to Premier Dalton McGuinty's wage freeze only after being granted the right to determine, through seniority, who could be hired as supply teachers. In Europe, 19th century socialism gave unions a new language - one that talked explicitly of the working class and suggested a brave new future. With notable exceptions, such as the avowedly revolutionary Industrial Workers of the World, North American labour tended to avoid talk of explicit class conflict. Even today, the language of a Canadian trade union - Brother This and Sister That - owes more to the fraternal lodge than to Karl Marx. This too should be no surprise. The first North American unions, such as the Knights of Labour, were often modeled on fraternal organizations like the International Order of Odd Fellows and provided similar practical benefits, such as burial insurance. Labour Day itself grew from an attempt by North American unions to distance themselves from their more radical European cousins, who preferred to celebrate May 1, a day dedicated to the revolutionary struggle against capitalism. By contrast, Labour Day has always been presented as far more benign. "Labour Day stands for industrial peace," the American Federation of Labour's Samuel Gompers wrote in 1910. "Our labour movement has no system to crush. It has nothing to overturn." This is not to say that North American labour lacked radicals. The Depression of the 1930s helped Communists and other revolutionaries organize industrial unions. But it's probably worth noting that, thanks to war-related labour shortages, unions made even greater gains in the 1940s. More to the point, depression and war led to the unstated social compact of the Cold War: Government would allow unions to organize; corporate employers would let workers keep more of what they produced; unions would oppose Communism and maintain social peace. The reasons for labour's decline from the 1970s on are well known. Manufacturing has moved to low-wage countries. Non-manufacturing industries are harder to organize. Now, recession has emboldened business to destroy those remaining union jobs that do exist, either directly or through so-called right-to-work laws that make organizing tough. Caterpillar Inc.'s shutdown of a unionized locomotive plant in London is a classic example, Governments haven't yet figured out how to outsource their own employees to China so they are taking on unions by fiat - as Toronto city council did with its garbage workers and McGuinty is doing with teachers. As unions disappear, so do well-paying, secure jobs. When labour is strong, even non-union shops pay well - just to prevent themselves from being organized. When labour is weak, that pressure evaporates. As well-paid jobs disappear so does the middle class. A study released this week by the U.S. National Employment Law Project confirms what many suspected: the American jobs being regained since 2008 pay far less than those which were lost. Sadly, much of the middle-class doesn't recognize the role that unions play in keeping everyone's wages at livable levels. A survey done for Public Response (a spin-off from Ottawa's Rideau Institute) suggests that about 42 per cent of Canadians think unions do little for society at large. Blinkered thinking. We are all paying the price Thomas Walkom's column appears Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday. * * * http://nader.org/2012/08/29/harry-kelber-challenges-the-afl-cio/ Harry Kelber Challenges the AFL-CIO Ralph Nader The Nader Page: August 29, 2012 "Why should I listen to anything Harry Kelber says?" exclaimed a visibly indignant Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO. Maybe because Kelber, 98 years young, has been honestly fighting for labor rights as a worker, union organizer, pamphleteer, author, professor and overall hairshirt of the moribund organized labor movement for 78 years-or 15 years before Trumka, the former coal miner and United Mine Workers' president, was born. Kelber writes and speaks about what is on the minds of millions of union workers and non-union workers. Why aren't organized labor's leaders more aggressive in addressing the plight of American labor by challenging big companies and their political allies? Why didn't the AFL-CIO leadership hold Barack Obama in 2009, 2010, and 2011 to his specific 2008 promises to press Congress for a $9.50 federal minimum wage by 2011 and, when under control of the Democrats, get Congress to pass the "card check" that would give millions of workers a chance to organize in Walmart, McDonalds and other companies that employ low-wage labor and provide few benefits? How can the AFL-CIO's "policy of silence and secrecy. serve the interest of union members?" Kelber criticizes the Federation for its top-down control, its aversion to any democratic process for its elections, and for not taking full advantage of the Wall Street crash, the taxpayer bailouts, and U.S. corporations sending jobs to repressive dictatorships abroad. Kelber wants the AFL-CIO and its member unions to fight against this strip-mining of the American economy and work closely with labor unions from other countries with the same corporate employers. In truth, to outsiders, Trumka's labor federation appears a defeated giant in its great white headquarters on Washington, D.C.'s 16th Street, across from the White House. To be sure, it confronts formidable external trends which include a declining union membership, right wing Governors attacking its pensions, faster automation, corporate globalization, huge corporate slush funds to buy or rent politicians and anti-worker laws such as the notorious union-blocking Taft-Hartley Law of 1947 now in its 65th year of damage. The old saying, however, is that when the going gets tough, the tough get going. That is not happening. Trumka delivers "give 'em hell" speeches against corporate abuses, but gives the cowardly Democratic Party and its elected officials a pass. Consequently the Democrats take campaign money from unions and, led by a President who would not have been elected president without them, take the AFL-CIO support for granted. Recently, Cong. Jesse Jackson, Jr. and other Representatives introduced HR. 5901 (The Catching Up With 1968 Act of 2012) to enact a $10 minimum wage to benefit 30 million workers languishing between the present $7.25 minimum wage and $10. So far the AFL-CIO hasn't put any muscle or part of its multi-million dollar television ad buys behind it. Inside an AFL-CIO's executive council meeting one day, Trumka criticized President Obama and incurred the displeasure of one labor baron who said there should be no criticism even in their private meeting. Trumka objected to that request for self-censorship. Meanwhile, the corporate barons in the nearby U.S. Chamber of Commerce building go after Obama with hammer and tongs, even though the President has gone out of his way to coddle them, to walk over and speak to them last year - something he has not done to his AFL-CIO neighbors. Worse, Obama appointed Jeffrey Immelt, CEO of the net job-exporting, no federal-tax-paying, anti-union, very profitable General Electric, head of the White House's Jobs Council. Mr. Trumka sits with him and never urges the repeal of Taft-Hartley while he listens to the corporatists demand more and more deregulation, tax breaks, subsidies and other forms of corporate welfare. Kelber has pointed out the financial distress enveloping the AFL-CIO itself. So strapped is the AFL-CIO budget that it is selling its affiliates visionary 47 acre labor campus in suburban Maryland where it is reportedly losing about $6 million a year. Why? The Federation is not about to explain its budgetary priorities to its rank and file. There are good people inside the labor headquarters. They are muzzled. Trumka will say he has his hands full with the heads of member unions who, he has implied, are not exactly progressive or aggressive for change. Here he has a point. While Trumka and John Hiatt control the staff, he has to deal with a fractious group of member unions, most of which want to stay beneath the radar and avoid notice. Unless they have nothing to hide, union leaders generally avoid the spotlight. They remember too many prosecutions of their forbears. Don't rock the boat. Even on Labor Day, they do not come forward prominently to dominate the news with major events and announcements. The Labor Day parades are either extinct or a diluted shadow of their earlier years. Yet, this upcoming Labor Day, as I wrote President Obama, there is a great opportunity for collaboration between him, union leaders, workers and social justice organizations to take a stand for the $10 minimum wage that is favored by 70 percent of the people. It would be a leading media event that is the long overdue right thing to do, both morally and economically. Even Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney, until the latter waffled earlier this year, have long favored a minimum wage keeping up with inflation. Isn't it time for 30 million hardpressed American workers to receive what workers got in 1968? Obama has not replied to my suggestion. Nor has the AFL-CIO. Kelber is right. It is time for a new labor federation of, by and for the workers. See Kelber's www.laboreducator.org <http://www.laboreducator.org/> and participate. He vigorously welcomes you and your views. _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5227 - Release Date: 08/27/12 Internal Virus Database is out of date. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
